The Disposition of Life Insurance Proceeds in the Absence of a Living Beneficiary: A Comprehensive Legal and Financial Analysis

Introduction

A life insurance policy is a unique financial instrument, fundamentally operating as a contract between the policyholder and an insurer.¹

Its primary purpose is to deliver a specified death benefit to a designated party, thereby providing financial security to loved ones.

A core feature of this contract is its design to operate outside the often lengthy and complex court-supervised estate administration process known as probate.³

This report addresses the critical conflict that arises when the foundational premise of this contract is broken: when the designated beneficiary is deceased or otherwise unable to accept the proceeds.

This single point of failure triggers a cascade of legal and financial consequences that can subvert the policyholder’s original intent.

This analysis provides a definitive roadmap for navigating this cascade, from the intended order of succession to the complex legal entanglements of probate, with the ultimate goal of empowering policyholders to secure their intended legacy and prevent the transformation of a protected financial lifeline into a vulnerable estate asset.

Section 1: The Established Order of Payout Succession

The intended pathway for life insurance proceeds is a non-probate transfer that relies on a clear and valid hierarchy of beneficiaries.

This structure is designed to be swift, private, and efficient, ensuring funds reach their intended recipients without court intervention.

This “waterfall” structure is robust, but its efficacy is entirely dependent on the policyholder’s diligence in naming and maintaining a complete list of beneficiaries.

1.1 The Role of the Primary Beneficiary

The primary beneficiary is the person, persons, or entity designated to be first in line to receive the life insurance death benefit upon the insured’s death.⁵

A policyholder has the flexibility to name more than one primary beneficiary and to assign specific percentages of the death benefit to each individual.⁵

For example, a spouse could be allocated 70 percent of the proceeds, while a sibling receives 30 percent.⁵

Upon the insured’s passing, the claims process is initiated by the beneficiary.

This typically involves submitting a formal claim or “Request for Benefits” to the insurance company, along with a certified copy of the death certificate.¹

This represents the ideal scenario, where the contractual obligation of the insurer is clear and direct.

The process bypasses the court system entirely, and the payout is generally made directly to the named party, fulfilling the policy’s core function of providing timely financial support.

1.2 The Contingent Beneficiary: The First Line of Defense

A contingent beneficiary, also known as a secondary beneficiary, serves as a critical backup.

This individual or entity receives the death benefit only if all primary beneficiaries are deceased, cannot be located, or formally refuse the payout.⁷

While naming a contingent beneficiary is typically not required by insurers, it is a foundational estate planning tool that acts as the first and most effective line of defense against the proceeds defaulting to the insured’s estate.⁷

Similar to primary beneficiaries, a policyholder can name multiple contingent beneficiaries and allocate specific percentages of the payout among them.¹⁰

This designation represents the policyholder’s “Plan B” and is a simple, no-cost method for adding a crucial layer of certainty and protection to the policy’s structure.¹⁵

The ability for a primary beneficiary to refuse or “disclaim” the benefit is a subtle but important feature.

A wealthy beneficiary might disclaim a payout for their own estate tax planning purposes, allowing the funds to pass directly to the contingent beneficiaries (e.g., their children) without being considered a taxable gift from the primary beneficiary.

This highlights how a well-structured policy with contingent beneficiaries serves not only as a backup in case of death but also as a tool for sophisticated, post-mortem financial strategy.

1.3 Multiple Beneficiaries: Handling a Partial Failure

When a policy names multiple primary beneficiaries and one of them predeceases the insured, the situation introduces the first layer of complexity.

In most cases, the deceased beneficiary’s share is automatically divided among the surviving primary beneficiaries.¹

For instance, if three children are named as equal beneficiaries and one passes away, the two surviving children would each receive half of the total death benefit instead of their original one-third share.⁹

This default action is typically based on a per capita (by head) distribution method.

However, this may not align with the policyholder’s wishes, particularly if they intended for the deceased beneficiary’s children (their grandchildren) to inherit that share.

To achieve that outcome, the policyholder must proactively specify a per stirpes (by branch) designation.⁹

The specific terms outlined in the insurance contract will ultimately govern this reallocation, underscoring the importance of understanding these distribution methods, which are detailed further in Section 3.¹³

Section 2: The Critical Default: When Proceeds Are Paid to the Estate

The failure of the beneficiary waterfall—the exhaustion of all named individuals—triggers a profound shift in the legal and financial nature of the death benefit.

The proceeds are diverted into the decedent’s estate, where they are subjected to the court-supervised probate process.

This outcome is typically the result of administrative neglect and has severe, often unforeseen, consequences.

2.1 Conditions Leading to an Estate Payout

Life insurance proceeds are paid to the deceased’s estate under several specific conditions:

• The sole primary beneficiary is deceased, and no contingent beneficiary was named.⁹
• All named primary and contingent beneficiaries have predeceased the insured.¹
• No beneficiary was ever named on the policy.¹
• The beneficiary designation is unclear or invalid. Using generic terms like “my spouse” or “my children” without specific names can lead to legal disputes, especially in cases of divorce, remarriage, or blended families, forcing the insurer to pay the funds to the estate to let the court decide.⁸
• The estate itself was intentionally named as the beneficiary, a strategy that is sometimes used but is often ill-advised due to the consequences that follow.⁸

2.2 An Introduction to the Probate Process

Probate is the formal legal process, supervised by a court, for settling a deceased person’s financial affairs.³

If the decedent left a valid will, the court oversees the executor’s duties to ensure the will’s instructions are followed.

If there is no will (a condition known as dying “intestate”), the court appoints an administrator and directs the distribution of assets according to state intestacy laws, which dictate a rigid hierarchy of next of kin.¹

The process involves several key steps: validating the will, appointing a personal representative (executor or administrator), formally notifying heirs and creditors, inventorying all estate assets, paying all outstanding debts and taxes, and finally, distributing the remaining property to the rightful heirs.¹

When life insurance proceeds enter this system, they are no longer a private contractual payment but a public estate asset under judicial control.

2.3 The Consequences of Probate

The failure of a beneficiary designation does not simply reroute the death benefit; it fundamentally transforms its legal and financial character.

It ceases to be a specialized, protected financial instrument and becomes a general, vulnerable probate asset.

The advantages the policyholder paid for are stripped away, and the family receives a diminished inheritance subject to liabilities the policy was designed to circumvent.

• Loss of Immediacy: Payouts to named beneficiaries are designed to be swift, typically occurring within 30 to 60 days of a claim being filed.¹¹ This provides immediate liquidity for funeral costs, mortgage payments, and living expenses. In stark contrast, the probate process is notoriously slow. A simple, uncontested estate may take several months to resolve, while a typical case can last from nine months to over two years.¹ This delay defeats a primary purpose of life insurance.³
• Exposure to Creditors: Perhaps the most damaging consequence is the loss of creditor protection. Proceeds paid directly to a named beneficiary are generally shielded from the claims of the deceased’s creditors.⁸ However, once those same funds become part of the estate, they are converted into general assets that are legally required to be used to pay all of the decedent’s outstanding obligations. This includes final medical bills, credit card debts, taxes, and funeral costs, all of which must be settled
  before any money is distributed to heirs.¹ This can dramatically reduce or, in cases of significant debt, completely eliminate the funds intended for the family.³ This creates a perverse situation where a policy intended for family support can become a windfall for commercial lenders and other creditors.
• Increased Costs and Diminished Value: The probate process itself is expensive. Costs paid from the estate’s assets include court filing fees, legal fees for the estate’s attorney, and compensation for the executor or administrator.¹⁸ These administrative expenses further diminish the net value of the life insurance payout that heirs eventually receive.⁸
• Loss of Privacy: Probate is a public proceeding. The will, the inventory of assets (which now includes the life insurance policy’s value), the list of debts, and the final distribution plan are all filed with the court and become public records.³ This stands in sharp contrast to the confidential and private transaction between an insurance company and a named beneficiary.

The following table provides a clear comparison of the two potential pathways for a life insurance payout, crystallizing the stakes for the policyholder.

Table 1: Payout Pathway and Consequences

Characteristic	Payout to Named Beneficiary	Payout to Estate
Recipient	The specific individual(s) or entity named in the contract.	Heirs as determined by the will or state intestacy laws, after all other obligations are met.
Speed of Payout	Typically 30-60 days.	9-24 months or longer, subject to court timeline.
Creditor Protection	Generally protected from decedent’s creditors.	Not protected; used to pay all estate debts first.
Privacy	Private transaction.	Public court record.
Associated Costs	None (beyond filing the claim).	Court fees, attorney fees, executor fees.
Governing Document	Life Insurance Contract.	Will (or Intestacy Law) and Probate Court Orders.

Section 3: Directing the Flow: Per Stirpes vs. Per Capita Designations

For policyholders with multiple beneficiaries, particularly across different generations, per stirpes and per capita designations are powerful legal tools.

These terms provide the insurer with pre-programmed instructions on how to distribute a deceased beneficiary’s share, allowing the policyholder to exert control over the inheritance and prevent unintended outcomes.²⁵

The choice between them is not a mere technicality but a reflection of the policyholder’s core values regarding generational wealth transfer.¹³

3.1 Per Stirpes (“By Branch”)

The term per stirpes is Latin for “by branch” or “by roots”.¹³

When this designation is used, if a beneficiary predeceases the insured, their designated share of the proceeds is not reallocated among the other surviving beneficiaries.

Instead, it passes down to that deceased beneficiary’s direct descendants (their children or grandchildren).⁵

This method ensures that each primary branch of the family receives an equal portion of the original inheritance, effectively preventing grandchildren from being disinherited by the untimely death of their parent.²⁷

For example, consider a $900,000 policy naming three children (A, B, and C) as equal primary beneficiaries with a per stirpes designation.

If Child C predeceases the policyholder, leaving two children of their own (C1 and C2), the payout would be as follows: Child A receives $300,000, Child B receives $300,000, and Child C’s original $300,000 share is divided equally between C1 and C2, who each receive $150,000.⁵

3.2 Per Capita (“By Head”)

Per capita is Latin for “by head”.²⁵

In its most common application, this designation directs that if a beneficiary predeceases the insured, their share is divided equally among the

surviving named beneficiaries in that same class.⁹

Under this structure, the descendants of the deceased beneficiary receive nothing from the policy.⁹

This method prioritizes the surviving individuals named by the policyholder, concentrating the benefit among them.

Using the same $900,000 policy scenario, if the designation was per capita and Child C predeceased the policyholder, the entire $900,000 death benefit would be divided equally between the two surviving “heads,” Child A and Child B.

They would each receive $450,000.

Child C’s children, C1 and C2, would receive nothing.⁵

While less common, it is possible to specify a distribution “to my descendants, per capita,” which would divide the proceeds equally among all living descendants, including children and grandchildren, resulting in a different allocation.⁵

The table below offers a direct, numerical comparison to eliminate any ambiguity between these two critical choices.

Table 2: Comparative Analysis of Per Stirpes vs. Per Capita

Attribute	Per Stirpes (“By Branch”)	Per Capita (“By Head”)
Core Principle	Inheritance follows the family branch. A deceased beneficiary’s share flows down to their descendants.	Inheritance is distributed equally among the surviving named individuals in a class.
Scenario	Policy: $900,000. Beneficiaries: Children A, B, C. Child C is deceased, leaving two children (Grandchildren C1, C2).	Policy: $900,000. Beneficiaries: Children A, B, C. Child C is deceased, leaving two children (Grandchildren C1, C2).
Payout Distribution	A gets $300,000. B gets $300,000. C1 gets $150,000. C2 gets $150,000.	A gets $450,000. B gets $450,000. C1 gets $0. C2 gets $0.
Primary Intent	To ensure each line of descent receives an equal share of the estate, protecting grandchildren.	To reward the surviving members of a specific group, concentrating the inheritance among them.

Section 4: Navigating Special Circumstances and Governing Laws

While the beneficiary designations within the insurance contract are paramount, certain legal doctrines and specific situations can override or complicate the standard succession process.

Understanding this legal hierarchy is essential for a complete picture of how proceeds are distributed.

4.1 The Uniform Simultaneous Death Act (USDA)

This statute addresses the tragic and legally ambiguous scenario where the insured and the primary beneficiary die at the same time or in very close succession (typically within 120 hours of one another), making it impossible to determine who died first.³⁰

To prevent the absurdity of having the life insurance proceeds pass to the beneficiary’s estate only to be immediately probated and passed to the beneficiary’s heirs, the USDA creates a legal presumption.

For the purposes of the life insurance policy, the law presumes that the

insured survived the beneficiary.³⁰

As a result, the death benefit is paid out as if the primary beneficiary had already predeceased the insured.

The proceeds flow to the named contingent beneficiary or, if there is none, to the insured’s estate.¹

It is important to note that a life insurance policy can contain its own specific clause regarding simultaneous death that may override the state’s USDA provisions.³¹

4.2 Minors as Beneficiaries

It is a common error to name a minor child directly as a beneficiary.

A minor cannot legally take control of or receive a direct payout of life insurance proceeds.¹²

If a minor is named, the insurance company cannot release the funds.

Instead, a legal proceeding must be initiated for a court to appoint a guardian to manage the money on the child’s behalf until they reach the age of majority in their state.¹⁶

This process involves the probate court, incurring legal fees and delays that the policy was designed to avoid.²³

The proper solution is for the policyholder to either establish a trust for the minor’s benefit and name the trust as the beneficiary, or to name an adult custodian for the minor under the Uniform Transfers to Minors Act (UTMA).¹²

4.3 The Supremacy of the Contract Over the Will

One of the most critical and frequently misunderstood principles of estate planning is the hierarchy between a life insurance policy and a will.

A life insurance policy is a legally binding contract, and the beneficiary designation is its primary directive.⁴

A will is a separate legal document that governs the distribution of probate assets.³³

The beneficiary designation on the life insurance policy

always supersedes any conflicting instructions in a will.²²

A policyholder cannot change their life insurance beneficiary simply by stating a different intention in their will; the change must be made directly with the insurance company according to the procedures outlined in the policy contract.⁴

The will only gains authority over the proceeds if the beneficiary designation has failed and the funds have already defaulted to the estate.¹

4.4 Unclaimed Benefits

In some cases, a death benefit is not paid because the named beneficiaries are unaware that the policy exists, or the insurance company is unable to locate them.³⁴

The funds are not lost forever.

State laws on abandoned property provide a final safety Net. After a statutorily defined period of dormancy (e.g., three years in Texas and Michigan), the insurer must transfer the proceeds to the state’s unclaimed property office.³⁵

Heirs and beneficiaries can then search these state-run databases to find and file a claim for the funds.³⁵

To combat this problem, many states now require insurers to proactively and regularly compare their in-force policy records against government databases like the Social Security Administration’s Death Master File to identify deceased policyholders and initiate the search for beneficiaries.³⁶

Section 5: Proactive Planning: A Policyholder’s Guide to Ensuring Intent

The preceding analysis demonstrates that the intended, seamless transfer of life insurance proceeds can be easily derailed by administrative neglect.

The following proactive measures are essential for any policyholder to ensure their final wishes are honored and their loved ones are protected from unintended legal and financial hardship.

5.1 The Imperative of Regular Policy Review

A life insurance policy should not be a “set it and forget it” document.

Beneficiary designations must be reviewed periodically and, most critically, after any major life event.

These events include marriage, divorce, the birth or adoption of a child, or the death of a previously named beneficiary.³

An outdated beneficiary designation is one of the most common and costly errors in estate planning, often leading to proceeds being paid to an ex-spouse or defaulting to the estate when a new spouse or child was the intended recipient.¹²

A biennial review of all beneficiary designations should be a standard part of personal financial management.

5.2 The Importance of Specificity

Ambiguity is the enemy of an effective beneficiary designation.

Vague, generic terms like “my spouse” or “my children” should be avoided at all costs.⁸

Such language can create confusion and invite legal challenges, particularly in situations involving remarriage or blended families.⁸

The proper method is to use the full legal name of each beneficiary, along with other identifying information such as their date of birth, Social Security number, and current contact information.⁵

This level of detail leaves no room for interpretation and ensures the insurer can quickly and correctly identify the proper recipient.

5.3 Advanced Strategies: The Role of Trusts

For individuals with significant assets or complex family situations, naming a trust as the beneficiary of a life insurance policy offers superior control and protection.³

A trust is a legal entity that can hold and manage assets on behalf of its beneficiaries.

Naming a trust can solve several problems:

• Managing Funds for Minors: A trust can hold and manage the proceeds for minor children, distributing funds for their health, education, and welfare according to the policyholder’s specific instructions, avoiding the need for a court-appointed guardian.¹²
• Protecting Special Needs Beneficiaries: For a beneficiary with a disability who receives government assistance, a direct inheritance could disqualify them from those essential benefits. A properly structured special needs trust can receive the life insurance proceeds and use them to supplement, rather than replace, government aid.¹²
• Controlling Distributions: For beneficiaries who may not be financially responsible, a trust allows the policyholder to control the timing and manner of distributions, providing for installment payments over time rather than a single lump sum.³
• Estate Tax Reduction: For very large estates, an Irrevocable Life Insurance Trust (ILIT) can be created to own the policy. This removes the death benefit from the insured’s taxable estate, potentially saving a significant amount in federal or state estate taxes.¹⁷

5.4 Communicating with Your Heirs

A significant reason that benefits go unclaimed is simply that beneficiaries are unaware a policy exists.³⁶

It is vital for policyholders to communicate with their designated beneficiaries and their chosen executor.

They should be informed that they have been named and be provided with the name of the insurance company, the policy number, and instructions on where the physical or digital policy documents are stored.¹²

Creating a “legacy file” or a letter of instruction that consolidates this information and is kept with other important estate planning documents is a simple but highly effective practice.

Conclusion

The disposition of life insurance proceeds is governed by a clear but unforgiving legal framework.

The life insurance policy operates as a standalone contract, and its beneficiary designations are paramount, overriding even the explicit instructions of a will.

The system is designed to provide a rapid, private, and protected transfer of wealth, but its success hinges entirely on the policyholder’s administrative diligence.

A failure to name a contingent beneficiary or to keep designations current with life’s changes can inadvertently trigger a catastrophic failure of the policy’s primary function.

This failure transforms a protected, immediate financial lifeline into a delayed, diminished, and public probate asset, vulnerable to the claims of creditors and the costs of the court system.

The choice between a per stirpes and per capita distribution further dictates whether an entire branch of a family will inherit or be excluded.

Ultimately, a life insurance policy cannot be viewed as a static asset.

It is a dynamic component of a comprehensive estate plan that requires regular, thoughtful attention to ensure that a policyholder’s final intentions are honored and their legacy is securely passed to the next generation.

Works cited

1. Life Insurance With No Beneficiaries: What to Know – Western …, accessed August 15, 2025, https://www.westernsouthern.com/life-insurance/life-insurance-with-no-beneficiaries
2. Life Insurance and The Statute of Wills: The Wisconsin Statute – Insight @ Dickinson Law, accessed August 15, 2025, https://insight.dickinsonlaw.psu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=2103&context=dlra
3. Does Life Insurance Affect The Probate Process In California? – Klosek Law Offices, accessed August 15, 2025, https://kloseklawoffices.com/does-life-insurance-affect-the-probate-process-in-california/
4. Changing a Life Beneficiary by Will – Scholarship Repository, accessed August 15, 2025, https://scholarship.law.wm.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=3061&context=wmlr
5. What Happens If Your Life Insurance Beneficiary Dies Before You …, accessed August 15, 2025, https://www.bankrate.com/insurance/life-insurance/life-insurance-beneficiary-dies/
6. 13. What is the difference between a primary beneficiary and a contingent beneficiary with regard to death benefits? – Connecticut Office of the State Comptroller, accessed August 15, 2025, https://osc.ct.gov/faqs/what-is-the-difference-between-a-primary-beneficiary-and-a-contingent-beneficiary-with-regard-to-death-benefits/
7. What is a Contingent Beneficiary? – Aflac, accessed August 15, 2025, https://www.aflac.com/resources/life-insurance/what-is-a-contingent-beneficiary.aspx
8. What Happens to Life Insurance with No Beneficiary? – Thrivent Financial, accessed August 15, 2025, https://www.thrivent.com/insights/life-insurance/what-happens-to-life-insurance-with-no-beneficiary
9. What to do when your life insurance beneficiary dies – eFinancial, accessed August 15, 2025, https://www.efinancial.com/resources/life-insurance-beneficiary-dies/
10. What Is a Contingent Beneficiary? – MetLife, accessed August 15, 2025, https://www.metlife.com/stories/benefits/contingent-beneficiary/
11. Life Insurance Death Benefits: What You Need to Know | Guardian, accessed August 15, 2025, https://www.guardianlife.com/life-insurance/death-benefits
12. What happens when your life insurance beneficiary dies before you?, accessed August 15, 2025, https://www.selectquote.com/life-insurance/articles/what-happens-when-beneficiary-dies-before-you
13. What Happens When A Life Insurance Beneficiary … – Lifeinsure.com, accessed August 15, 2025, https://www.lifeinsure.com/when-a-life-insurance-beneficiary-dies/
14. What Is a Contingent Beneficiary? – Progressive, accessed August 15, 2025, https://www.progressive.com/answers/life-insurance-contingent-beneficiary/
15. What is a Contingent Beneficiary – Lemonade Insurance, accessed August 15, 2025, https://www.lemonade.com/life/explained/contingent-beneficiary/
16. Is Life Insurance Claim Subject to Probate and does it go into an Estate?, accessed August 15, 2025, https://www.lifeinsuranceattorney.com/blog/2022/august/is-life-insurance-claim-subject-to-probate-and-d/
17. Are Life Insurance Proceeds Considered Part of an Estate? – Fidelity Life, accessed August 15, 2025, https://fidelitylife.com/life-insurance-basics/final-expense-life-insurance-101/is-life-insurance-part-of-an-estate/
18. Probate Process and Timeline – FindLaw, accessed August 15, 2025, https://www.findlaw.com/estate/probate/probate-process-and-timeline.html
19. What you need to know if you’re a life insurance beneficiary – Legal & General, accessed August 15, 2025, https://www.legalandgeneral.com/insurance/life-insurance/guides/being-a-life-insurance-beneficiary/
20. Understanding the Probate Process: What Happens When Life Insurance Goes to the Estate, accessed August 15, 2025, https://www.provisionlawfirm.com/blog/understanding-the-probate-process-what-happens-when-life-insurance-goes-to-the-estate
21. Life Insurance with No Beneficiary | Aflac, accessed August 15, 2025, https://www.aflac.com/resources/life-insurance/life-insurance-with-no-beneficiary.aspx
22. Is Life Insurance Part of an Estate After Death? – Western & Southern Financial Group, accessed August 15, 2025, https://www.westernsouthern.com/life-insurance/is-life-insurance-part-of-an-estate-after-death
23. The Ultimate Guide to Life Insurance and Probate | Trust & Will, accessed August 15, 2025, https://trustandwill.com/learn/life-insurance-and-probate/
24. Average Probate Process Timeline – Trust & Will, accessed August 15, 2025, https://trustandwill.com/learn/probate-timeline/
25. What Is a Beneficiary? Types & How to Choose – Vanguard, accessed August 15, 2025, https://investor.vanguard.com/investor-resources-education/beneficiaries
26. The Anatomy of Beneficiary Designations | Academy of Model Aeronautics Foundation, accessed August 15, 2025, https://amafoundation.modelaircraft.org/the-anatomy-of-beneficiary-designations
27. Per stirpes vs. per capita in a will: What’s the difference? – FreeWill, accessed August 15, 2025, https://www.freewill.com/learn/per-stirpes-vs-per-capita
28. The Difference Between Per Capita and Per Stirpes Beneficiary Designations | BRMM, accessed August 15, 2025, https://www.brmmlaw.com/blog/2021/may/the-difference-between-per-capita-and-per-stirpe/
29. What is the Difference Between Per Stirpes and Per Capita? – Trust & Will, accessed August 15, 2025, https://trustandwill.com/learn/difference-between-per-stirpes-and-per-capita/
30. Uniform Simultaneous Death Act – Wikipedia, accessed August 15, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Uniform_Simultaneous_Death_Act
31. Uniform Simultaneous Death Act: What it is, How it Works, accessed August 15, 2025, https://www.investopedia.com/terms/u/uniform-simultaneous-death-act.asp
32. 755 ILCS 5/ Probate Act of 1975. – Illinois General Assembly, accessed August 15, 2025, https://www.ilga.gov/legislation/ilcs/ilcs4.asp?DocName=075500050HArt.+III&ActID=2104&ChapterID=60&SeqStart=5000000&SeqEnd=5300000
33. Life Insurance Policy vs. A Will | Progressive, accessed August 15, 2025, https://www.progressive.com/answers/life-insurance-beneficiary-vs-will/
34. What happens to life insurance with no beneficiary? – Progressive, accessed August 15, 2025, https://www.progressive.com/answers/life-insurance-without-beneficiary/
35. Getting Paid – Claiming Unpaid Life Insurance Benefits in Texas, accessed August 15, 2025, https://comptroller.texas.gov/economy/fiscal-notes/archive/2017/june-july/claim.php
36. FAQS ON GROUP LIFE INSURANCE AND TERRORISM COVERAGE, accessed August 15, 2025, https://www.acli.com/-/media/acli/files/unclaimed-life-insurance-benefits-public/042618_unclaimedbenefits_consumerfaqs.pdf
37. MCL – Section 567.228 – Michigan Legislature, accessed August 15, 2025, https://www.legislature.mi.gov/Laws/MCL?objectName=mcl-567-228
38. INSURANCE CODE CHAPTER 1109. UNCLAIMED LIFE INSURANCE AND ANNUITY CONTRACT PROCEEDS – Texas Statutes, accessed August 15, 2025, https://statutes.capitol.texas.gov/GetStatute.aspx?Code=IN&Value=1109
39. How to Find an Unclaimed Life Insurance Policy? – Aflac, accessed August 15, 2025, https://www.aflac.com/resources/life-insurance/unclaimed-life-insurance.aspx
40. Looking in the ‘Lost and Found’ – NAIC, accessed August 15, 2025, https://content.naic.org/article/consumer-insight-looking-lost-and-found
41. Life Insurance and Probate: How Benefits Pass to Your Heirs – Ocampo Wiseman Law, accessed August 15, 2025, https://ocampowisemanlaw.com/post/life-insurance-and-probate-understanding-how-your-policy-passes-to-beneficiaries
42. Life Insurance Beneficiaries | New York City Estate Planning Lawyer – Jules Haas, accessed August 15, 2025, https://www.juleshaasattorney.com/practice-areas/trust-and-estates/beneficiary-clause/life-insurance-beneficiaries/
43. Individual Life Insurance FAQs – Illinois Department of Insurance, accessed August 15, 2025, https://idoi.illinois.gov/consumers/consumerinsurance/lifeannuities/faq-individual-life-insurance.html
44. Is Life Insurance Part of an Estate? – U.S. Bank, accessed August 15, 2025, https://www.usbank.com/wealth-management/financial-perspectives/trust-and-estate-planning/is-life-insurance-part-of-an-estate.html