Table of Contents
Introduction: The Ghost of Wright Field
On October 30, 1935, the future of American air power sat gleaming on the tarmac at Wright Field in Dayton, Ohio.
The Boeing Model 299 was a technological marvel, a four-engine behemoth that flew faster and farther than any bomber of its era.1
Dubbed the “Flying Fortress” by a journalist, it was poised to win a lucrative U.S. Army Air Corps contract, with an order for 65 aircraft all but guaranteed.2
Before a crowd of top-ranking military leaders, the bomber roared down the runway and climbed gracefully into the sky.
Then, at 300 feet, the unthinkable happened.
The plane stalled, tipped into a spin, and crashed in a fiery explosion.1
The accident claimed the lives of two of the nation’s most experienced test pilots, Major Ployer Peter Hill and Boeing’s Leslie Tower.1
The subsequent investigation revealed no mechanical failure.
The cause was a simple, devastating human error.
In the complexity of managing the advanced new aircraft, Major Hill, an expert aviator, had forgotten to release the gust locks—a mechanism that secured the plane’s elevator and rudder controls while parked on the ground.1
The verdict was damning: the Model 299 was “too much airplane for one man to fly”.3
This tragedy, born of human fallibility in the face of overwhelming complexity, stands as a stark ghost of warning, its lessons echoing far beyond the field of aviation.
Now, imagine a crash of a different kind.
Alex, our protagonist, has just experienced a life-altering personal injury.
The immediate aftermath is a whirlwind of pain, medical appointments, and profound disruption.
The legal system, with its arcane rules and intimidating procedures, is a distant abstraction.
Like many who find themselves in such a crisis, Alex assumes there will be “plenty of time” to sort things O.T.8
But in the complex cockpit of the law, an invisible clock has already started ticking, and an unforgiving ghost is watching.
Part I: The Illusion of Infinite Time (The Struggle)
The core challenge for any injured person is piercing the illusion of infinite time.
The statute of limitations is an unforgiving, complex reality that is often misunderstood or ignored by those who need to understand it most, creating a high-stakes struggle against an invisible and relentless clock.
The First Warning Light – Encountering the “Flight Manual”
Weeks, or perhaps months, after the injury, Alex finally sits down with an attorney.
The first critical topic of discussion is not the strength of the case or the potential for compensation, but a deadline: the statute of limitations (SOL).
This is the moment Alex is handed the “flight manual” for the legal journey ahead.
The statute of limitations is a law that establishes a strict time limit for filing a lawsuit after an injury occurs.10
Its purpose is twofold.
First, it provides fairness to defendants by preventing them from living under the indefinite threat of a lawsuit long after an event has passed.
Second, it promotes the timely resolution of disputes, ensuring that cases are litigated while evidence is still available and witnesses’ memories are still reliable.8
The system is not designed to be a trap for the unwary, but rather a fundamental pillar of legal philosophy that balances the rights of the injured with the need for societal and legal finality.
Without such limits, a person or company could be sued for an incident that happened decades prior, when evidence has vanished and key witnesses are gone.
The SOL is a societal trade-off: it may sacrifice some valid but stale claims in order to provide stability and predictability for everyone else.
It is a system-level design choice for legal certainty.
Alex’s initial assumption of a simple, uniform rule is quickly shattered.
The reality is a bewildering patchwork of laws that vary dramatically by jurisdiction.
Some states have filing windows as short as one year, such as Kentucky, Louisiana, and Tennessee.13
Others allow for much longer periods, like the six-year limit in Maine and North Dakota.10
The most common timeframe is two years, a deadline enforced in 26 states, including major jurisdictions like California and Texas.10
Meanwhile, states like New York and Washington allow for three years.8
This complexity is then compounded.
Even within a single state, the deadline can change based on the specific type of injury.
Twenty-two states have enacted separate, and often different, statutes for claims arising from motor vehicle accidents or medical malpractice.10
For instance, Colorado has a three-year SOL for auto accidents but a two-year SOL for most other personal injuries.15
Furthermore, claims against government entities are subject to their own unique and often drastically shorter timelines.
In Washington, a claim against a government body may need to be filed within 60 days.14
In Ontario, Canada, a written notice must be given to a municipality within just 10 days of an incident.16
The legal “cockpit” is filled with far more dials and switches than any layperson could possibly anticipate.
This fragmentation is a direct consequence of American federalism, where each state legislature is empowered to create its own legal framework.10
While this allows laws to be tailored to local needs, it creates what can only be described as a “justice lottery.” The right to sue can depend entirely on the geographic location of an accident.
An individual injured in a car crash on the Texas side of Texarkana is subject to a two-year statute of limitations.12
If the same crash had occurred just a few feet away on the Arkansas side of the border, the victim would have three years to file a claim.15
This accident of geography can be the sole determinant of whether a person has a right to seek justice, highlighting a deep, structural tension in the American legal system.
The Unforgiving Consequence of Failure
The stakes of misunderstanding this complex system could not be higher.
Missing the statute of limitations deadline is not a minor procedural hiccup that can be easily corrected; it is an absolute and final bar to recovery.9
If a claim is filed even one day late, the defendant can move to have it dismissed, and the court is obligated to do so, regardless of the severity of the injury or the strength of the evidence.9
This is the legal equivalent of the B-17’s fatal stall—a threshold is crossed from which there is no pulling up, no recovery.
This unforgiving rule is not just a passive legal doctrine; it can become an active, adversarial weapon.
Insurance companies and their defense teams are acutely aware of these deadlines.
They may intentionally delay or prolong settlement negotiations, making offers that seem to draw out the process, all while the clock is ticking.
Their hope is that the injured party, unaware of the approaching deadline, will let it expire, at which point the insurer’s legal obligation to pay anything at all simply vanishes.18
Table 1: The Labyrinth of Deadlines – A Comparative Overview of Personal Injury Statutes of Limitations
To illustrate the sheer scope of this complexity, the following table provides a snapshot of the general personal injury statutes of limitations across all 50 U.S. states and the province of Ontario, Canada.
| State/Province | General Personal Injury SOL (Years) | Notes / Common Exceptions |
| Alabama | 2 | 15 |
| Alaska | 2 | 15 |
| Arizona | 2 | 15 |
| Arkansas | 3 | 15 |
| California | 2 | Wrongful death: 2 years. Medical malpractice: 1 year from discovery or 3 years from injury.12 |
| Colorado | 2 | Motor vehicle accidents: 3 years.15 |
| Connecticut | 2 | 15 |
| Delaware | 2 | 15 |
| Florida | 2 | Previously 4 years, changed for incidents after 3/24/2023. Medical malpractice: 2 years from discovery.15 |
| Georgia | 2 | 15 |
| Hawaii | 2 | 15 |
| Idaho | 2 | 15 |
| Illinois | 2 | 13 |
| Indiana | 2 | 15 |
| Iowa | 2 | 15 |
| Kansas | 2 | 15 |
| Kentucky | 1 | Motor vehicle accidents: 2 years.13 |
| Louisiana | 1 | 13 |
| Maine | 6 | Medical malpractice: 3 years.10 |
| Maryland | 3 | 15 |
| Massachusetts | 3 | 13 |
| Michigan | 3 | 15 |
| Minnesota | 2 | For intentional torts. Negligence claims can be up to 6 years depending on damages.15 |
| Mississippi | 3 | 15 |
| Missouri | 5 | 10 |
| Montana | 3 | Medical malpractice: 2 years from injury or discovery.15 |
| Nebraska | 4 | 10 |
| Nevada | 2 | 15 |
| New Hampshire | 3 | 15 |
| New Jersey | 2 | 15 |
| New Mexico | 3 | 15 |
| New York | 3 | 8 |
| North Carolina | 3 | 15 |
| North Dakota | 6 | 10 |
| Ohio | 2 | 15 |
| Oklahoma | 2 | 15 |
| Oregon | 2 | 15 |
| Pennsylvania | 2 | 15 |
| Rhode Island | 3 | 13 |
| South Carolina | 3 | 15 |
| South Dakota | 3 | 15 |
| Tennessee | 1 | 13 |
| Texas | 2 | Medical malpractice: 2 years from negligence, with a 10-year statute of repose.12 |
| Utah | 4 | 10 |
| Vermont | 3 | Medical malpractice: 3 years from incident or 2 from discovery.10 |
| Virginia | 2 | 22 |
| Washington | 3 | 14 |
| West Virginia | 2 | 15 |
| Wisconsin | 3 | 15 |
| Wyoming | 4 | 10 |
| Ontario, Canada | 2 | Notice for municipal claims: 10 days. Notice for slip & fall on ice: 60 days.16 |
Note: This table is for informational purposes and is not a substitute for legal advice.
Laws are subject to change and specific circumstances can alter deadlines.
Part II: The Unseen Levers and the Professional Crew (The Epiphany)
For Alex, the initial feeling of being overwhelmed begins to subside, replaced by a dawning understanding.
This is the epiphany: the complex legal machine is not designed solely to be punitive.
It has built-in safety features and is operated by a professional crew trained to navigate its intricacies.
The analogy shifts from the intimidating complexity of the cockpit to understanding what each specific lever and switch is designed to do.
Deciphering the Controls – The Doctrine of Discovery and Tolling
Alex’s epiphany begins as the lawyer explains that the ticking clock is not always as rigid as it first appears.
The legal system has evolved, creating exceptions that function as critical “safety valves” to prevent injustice.
These exceptions are not arbitrary “loopholes” but are the system’s codified memory of past failures.
Each rule—from the discovery rule to tolling provisions—likely arose from a historical case where a rigid application of a deadline would have produced a profoundly unfair result.
The body of SOL exception law can be viewed as an evolving safety manual, constantly updated based on new “crash reports” of injustice.
The most significant of these is the Discovery Rule.
This doctrine holds that the statute of limitations clock does not begin to run on the date of the negligent act itself, but rather on the date the injury was discovered, or reasonably should have been discovered with due diligence.8
This principle is essential in cases involving latent injuries, where the harm is not immediately apparent.
For example, in cases of medical malpractice or exposure to a toxic substance like asbestos, symptoms may not manifest for months or even years.13
The discovery rule acknowledges the fundamental unfairness of barring a claim before the victim could have possibly known it existed.
Other controls act as a “pause” button on the clock, a process known as tolling.
- Minors: In most jurisdictions, if the injured party is a minor (under 18), the statute of limitations is tolled until they reach the age of majority.12 This protects children who lack the legal capacity to file a lawsuit on their own behalf.
- Mental Incapacity: Similarly, if a person is mentally incapacitated at the time of the injury or becomes so as a result of it, the clock may be paused until they regain legal competency.13
- Fraudulent Concealment: The law will not allow a defendant to benefit from their own deception. If a party actively and intentionally hides evidence of their wrongdoing, the statute of limitations can be tolled until the fraud is uncovered.13
To create a final backstop and balance these extensions, many states also have a Statute of Repose.
This is an absolute, final deadline—often 10, 15, or more years after the incident—after which no claim can be brought, regardless of when the injury was discovered.24
This is the system’s ultimate “engine cutoff,” ensuring that liability does not extend into infinity and providing finality for potential defendants.
The Professional “Flight Crew” – The Law Firm’s Human System
Alex’s second epiphany is the realization that a legal case is not flown by a single “pilot.” The attorney may be at the controls, making strategic decisions, but they are supported by an entire professional crew.
The most critical member of this crew is often the personal injury paralegal.
Drawing from the daily routines of these legal professionals, a clear picture emerges of the paralegal as the meticulous “crew chief” who executes the firm’s pre-flight checklist for every case.27
Their day is a highly structured exercise in diligence and organization:
- Prioritizing by Deadline: The day begins by reviewing all active cases and prioritizing tasks based on approaching deadlines, especially court-mandated ones. Time management is essential to prevent any case from being delayed.28
- Evidence Management: A core responsibility is the systematic gathering and organization of crucial evidence. This includes requesting, tracking, and summarizing medical records, police reports, witness statements, and financial documents.27
- Calendar and Document Control: The paralegal is the master of the case calendar, responsible for scheduling depositions and hearings, tracking all deadlines, and drafting critical legal documents like pleadings and schedules of loss for the attorney’s review.28
- Client Communication: Often, the paralegal serves as the client’s primary point of contact, providing regular updates on case progress, answering questions, and offering reassurance during what is often a stressful and difficult time.27
The paralegal’s work is the living embodiment of the checklist philosophy.
Their methodical review of files, constant updating of summaries, and relentless tracking of deadlines constitute the human system designed to catch the single forgotten step that could lead to disaster.
Their rigorous attention to detail is the firm’s primary defense against malpractice.27
This reveals a hidden dependency within the legal profession.
The high-level, strategic work of the attorney is entirely reliant on the flawless, systematic execution of their support staff.
This creates a potential point of systemic vulnerability.
A law firm’s success is directly tied to its ability to avoid malpractice, which is in turn dependent on flawless deadline management, which rests heavily on the shoulders of its paralegal staff.
A simple calendaring error by a paralegal can be just as catastrophic as a strategic blunder by a senior partner.
Therefore, a firm’s approach to risk management is only as strong as its investment in its support staff—their training, their tools, and their well-being are not operational overhead but core risk-mitigation strategies.
Part III: The Modern Cockpit and the Cost of Failure (The Application)
The final part of the journey brings the analogy into the 21st century.
It explores the sophisticated technological solutions created to manage the overwhelming complexity of modern litigation and confronts the ultimate horror story of what happens when all systems—human and technological—fail.
The Digital Checklist – Legal Tech as the Modern Cockpit
The simple paper checklist that saved the B-17 program has evolved.
The complexity that was once “too much for one man to fly” is now managed by powerful, integrated legal technology platforms.
The modern personal injury law firm operates from a digital cockpit designed to eliminate the kind of human error that doomed Major Hill.
Software platforms like Clio, Filevine, and PracticePanther have become indispensable tools, and their features directly address the risks posed by statutes of limitations.31
- Automated Deadline Calculation: A key feature of this software is its integration with court rules from hundreds of U.S. jurisdictions. It can automatically calculate and populate the case calendar with all relevant deadlines, from the initial SOL to discovery cutoffs and filing dates, virtually eliminating the risk of manual calculation error.34
- Centralized Dashboards and Workflows: These systems provide a single, at-a-glance view of every case’s status, upcoming deadlines, and assigned tasks. This transparency ensures that nothing falls through the cracks and allows managers to monitor workloads and progress across the entire firm.31
- Automated Reminders and Tasking: The software acts as a tireless digital paralegal, sending automated reminders to staff about upcoming deadlines and even automating repetitive workflows, such as sending follow-up requests for outstanding medical records.31
The entire legal practice management software industry is, in large part, a direct market response to the immense financial and professional risk posed by statutes of limitations.
Missing a deadline is a leading cause of legal malpractice claims, which are extraordinarily expensive for law firms and their insurance carriers.35
This created a powerful economic incentive to prevent these simple but costly errors.
The multi-million-dollar legal tech market was born from the risk created by this ancient legal doctrine.
As technology advances, an AI Co-Pilot is emerging.
Tools like Clio’s “Duo” can help attorneys and paralegals plan their schedules, summarize documents, and surface critical information from case files, acting as an intelligent assistant to the human legal team.34
However, this increasing reliance on technology creates a new and subtle form of systemic risk: technological dependency and the potential for “automation bias.” While technology solves the problem of flawed human memory, it introduces a new vulnerability.
What happens if the software is configured incorrectly, or if the data entered is flawed? More insidiously, what happens if the legal team becomes so reliant on automated reminders that they cease to engage in the critical thinking and manual double-checking that the old paper checklist forced upon them? The next generation of malpractice claims may not be “the lawyer forgot,” but rather “the team blindly trusted the algorithm.”
When the Pilot Fails – The Catastrophe of Legal Malpractice
This section confronts the worst-case scenario: what happens when the pilot, the crew, and all the safety systems fail.
Missing a statute of limitations is one of the most common, and most devastating, forms of legal malpractice.35
Unlike a complex strategic error that might be debatable, a missed deadline is a clear, objective failure that is often impossible to remedy.37
The causes are tragically mundane and echo the B-17 story: a simple calendaring mistake, a breakdown in communication, an overworked attorney, or an error by overwhelmed support staff.35
These are not failures of legal genius, but catastrophic failures of process and discipline.
When an SOL is missed, the client’s original claim is extinguished forever.
Their only remaining recourse is to file a new lawsuit against their own lawyer.39
This creates the notoriously difficult “case within a case.” To win a malpractice suit, the client must prove two things: first, that their lawyer was negligent in missing the deadline, and second, that they
would have won the original underlying personal injury case if it had been filed on time.38
The client is forced to litigate a hypothetical victory, a process as difficult as proving the B-17 would have successfully completed its mission if only it hadn’t crashed on takeoff.
Conclusion: Cleared for Takeoff
We return to Alex, whose lawsuit has been filed correctly and on time.
The journey from fear and ignorance to empowered understanding is complete.
Alex now sees the legal system not as an arbitrary and hostile maze, but as a complex, high-performance machine—one with known risks, but also with built-in safety features, operated by a professional crew trained to manage them.
The enduring lesson of the statute of limitations is the enduring lesson of the checklist.
As surgeon and author Atul Gawande articulated in The Checklist Manifesto, in any field defined by high stakes and “stupendous know-how,” from aviation to surgery to law, our greatest enemy is not a lack of knowledge, but our own “inevitable human inadequacies” and our failure to account for them.7
The statute of limitations is more than a deadline; it is the law’s foundational checklist.
It forces discipline.
It demands systematic procedure.
It serves as the critical first step that must be correctly executed to ensure a claim for justice can safely get off the ground.
Forgetting it is not an option.
Because as the ghost of Major Ployer Hill and the smoldering wreckage of the Model 299 remind us, the most important lessons are often, as one pilot said, “written in blood”.1
Works cited
- “On. Set. Checked.” | National Air and Space Museum, accessed August 14, 2025, https://airandspace.si.edu/air-and-space-quarterly/winter-2023/set-checked
- Did you know the pre-flight checklist was first introduced by Boeing following the 1935 crash of the prototype B-17 (then known as the Model 299)? – The Aviation Geek Club, accessed August 14, 2025, https://theaviationgeekclub.com/did-you-know-the-pre-flight-checklist-was-first-introduced-by-boeing-following-the-1935-crash-of-the-prototype-b-17-then-known-as-the-model-299/
- The story of the checklist – Anecdote, accessed August 14, 2025, https://www.anecdote.com/2013/12/story-checklist/
- Boeing B-17 Flying Fortress – Wikipedia, accessed August 14, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Boeing_B-17_Flying_Fortress
- Where did checklists come from? – Air Combat Command, accessed August 14, 2025, https://www.acc.af.mil/News/Article-Display/Article/200135/where-did-checklists-come-from/
- In 1934, the Army Air Corps – Air & Space Forces Magazine, accessed August 14, 2025, https://www.airandspaceforces.com/PDF/MagazineArchive/Documents/2013/August%202013/0813checklist.pdf
- The Checklist Manifesto – Atul Gawande – Ethan Schwandt, accessed August 14, 2025, https://themindmapguy.com/blogs/book-summaries/the-checklist-manifesto-atul-gawande
- Understanding Statute of Limitation in Personal Injury Cases – Roberts Markland LLP, accessed August 14, 2025, https://robertsmarkland.com/blog/personal-injury/understanding-statute-of-limitation-in-personal-injury-cases/
- How the Statute of Limitations Could Affect Your Personal Injury Case – Robins Cloud LLP, accessed August 14, 2025, https://www.robinscloud.com/blog/2025/may/how-the-statute-of-limitations-could-affect-your/
- Personal Injury Statute of Limitations by State | Martinian Lawyers, accessed August 14, 2025, https://www.martinianlaw.com/personal-injury-statute-of-limitations-by-state/
- Statute of Limitations In All 50 States – mwl-law.com, accessed August 14, 2025, https://www.mwl-law.com/resources/statute-limitations-50-states/
- The Statute of Limitations for Personal Injury Claims: California and Texas Deadlines, accessed August 14, 2025, https://www.karnsandkarns.com/the-statute-of-limitations-for-personal-injury-claims-california-and-texas-deadlines/
- Statute of Limitations for Personal Injury Claims: Why It Matters …, accessed August 14, 2025, https://bottarolaw.com/blog/statute-of-limitations-for-personal-injury-claims/
- Understanding Statute of Limitations for Personal Injury Claims in Washington, accessed August 14, 2025, https://brumleylawfirm.com/understanding-statute-of-limitations-for-personal-injury-claims-in-washington/
- Personal Injury Statute of Limitations – All 50 States – Work Injury Source, accessed August 14, 2025, https://workinjurysource.com/what-you-need-to-know/state-workers-compensation-resources/personal-injury-statute-of-limitations-all-50-states/
- Ontario’s Personal Injury Claim Deadlines: Know Your Rights, accessed August 14, 2025, https://neinstein.com/news-blog/personal-injury/personal-injury-claim-deadlines-ontario
- Statute of Limitations in Ontario – Mirian Law, accessed August 14, 2025, https://mirianlaw.com/blog/statute-of-limitations-in-ontario/
- Understanding the Statute of Limitations for Personal Injury Cases | Attorney Preston Day, accessed August 14, 2025, https://www.prestondaylaw.com/blog/understanding-the-statute-of-limitations-for-personal-injury-cases/
- Texas Statute of Limitations for Personal Injury Claims – Braker White, accessed August 14, 2025, https://brakerwhite.com/texas-statute-of-limitations-personal-injury/
- The Statute of Limitations: How It Affects Your Personal Injury Case, accessed August 14, 2025, https://www.my25lawyer.com/blog/the-statute-of-limitations-how-it-affects-your-personal-injury-case/
- Understanding the Personal Injury Statute of Limitations in New York, accessed August 14, 2025, https://www.wnyinjurylawyers.com/understanding-the-personal-injury-statute-of-limitations-in-new-york/
- § 8.01-243. Personal action for injury to person or property generally; extension in actions for malpractice against health care provider – Virginia Law, accessed August 14, 2025, https://law.lis.virginia.gov/vacode/title8.01/chapter4/section8.01-243/
- Can you sue for personal injury in Ontario? | Harrison Pensa Law, accessed August 14, 2025, https://www.harrisonpensa.com/personal-injury/can-you-sue-for-personal-injury-in-ontario/
- Statute of Limitations in Personal Injury Claims – Sorbara Law, accessed August 14, 2025, https://www.sorbaralaw.com/resources/knowledge-centre/publication/statute-of-limitations-in-personal-injury-claims
- Guide to the Birth Injury Statute of Limitations in Every State | Levin & Perconti, accessed August 14, 2025, https://www.levinperconti.com/birth-injury/statute-of-limitations-by-state/
- What Is the Statute of Limitations on Personal Injury in Texas? | McGilberry & Shirer LLP, accessed August 14, 2025, https://www.mcgilberryandshirer.com/whats-the-statute-of-limitations-on-personal-injury-in-texas/
- Navigating the Path to a Successful Personal Injury Paralegal Career, accessed August 14, 2025, https://masteroflegalstudies.com/career-guides/personal-injury-paralegal/
- A Day In The Life Of A Personal Injury Paralegal – Stephensons …, accessed August 14, 2025, https://www.stephensons.co.uk/site/blog/personal-injury-blog/a-day-in-the-life-of-a-personal-injury-paralegal
- A Day in the Life of a Litigation Paralegal – American Bar Association, accessed August 14, 2025, https://www.americanbar.org/groups/paralegals/blog/day-in-the-life-of-a-litigation-paralegal/
- What tasks does a Personal injury paralegal do everyday? – Reddit, accessed August 14, 2025, https://www.reddit.com/r/paralegal/comments/vgdgbx/what_tasks_does_a_personal_injury_paralegal_do/
- Personal Injury Software | Maximize Your Case Value | Filevine, accessed August 14, 2025, https://www.filevine.com/practice-types/personal-injury/
- Best Personal Injury Law Software for Practice Growth in 2025, accessed August 14, 2025, https://growlaw.co/blog/best-personal-injury-law-software
- Personal Injury Case Management Software for Law Firms – CARET Legal, accessed August 14, 2025, https://caretlegal.com/practice-management-software-for-personal-injury-attorneys/
- Legal Calendaring Software and Court Deadline Calculator | Clio, accessed August 14, 2025, https://www.clio.com/features/legal-calendaring-software/
- Most Common Mistakes That Can Lead to Legal Malpractice Claims …, accessed August 14, 2025, https://www.centurylawgroup.com/blog/mistakes-that-can-lead-to-legal-malpractice-claims/
- Legal Malpractice: Causes + How To Avoid It – MyCase, accessed August 14, 2025, https://www.mycase.com/blog/law-firm-operations/legal-malpractice-explained/
- Missed Deadline Legal Malpractice | Client Rights Guide, accessed August 14, 2025, https://courtroomlaw.com/missed-deadline-legal-malpractice-client-rights-guide/
- What is legal malpractice? – Sacramento County Public Law Library, accessed August 14, 2025, https://saclaw.org/resource_library/what-is-legal-malpractice/
- My lawyer just told me that she missed the statute of limitations on my car accident case, accessed August 14, 2025, https://www.hendersonlawllc.com/missed-the-statute-of-limitations/
- The case for checklists – PMC, accessed August 14, 2025, https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2942951/
