The A-Rated Illusion: A Professional’s Guide to Choosing an Insurer You Can Actually Trust

Part 1: The Façade – My Painful Lesson About A-Rated Insurers

As a financial advisor, my reputation is built on a foundation of trust and sound judgment.

For years, I operated under the same assumption as most consumers and professionals: that an “A” rating from a top agency like A.M. Best was the gold standard, a definitive seal of an insurance company’s reliability.

I believed it was the most important factor in safeguarding my clients’ futures.

I was wrong.

My epiphany came through the harrowing experience of my close friends, the Millers.

When they bought their dream home, they came to me for advice on homeowners insurance.

I did what I always did: I researched the market, focusing on companies with the highest financial strength ratings.

We settled on a well-known insurer, one that proudly displayed its “A+ (Superior)” rating from A.M. Best.¹

I was confident I had steered them toward a fortress, a company with the deep financial reserves to make them whole after any disaster.

Less than a year later, disaster struck.

A burst pipe in an upstairs bathroom sent water cascading through their ceilings and walls, causing extensive damage.

It was a clear-cut, covered event.

But when the Millers filed their claim, the fortress they thought they had purchased revealed itself to be a house of cards.

Their experience became a textbook case of the “deny, delay, defend” strategy that plagues the industry.²

The initial response was slow.

The adjuster seemed more interested in finding reasons to limit the payout than in assessing the damage.

The claim was met with an endless cycle of requests for more documentation, confusing explanations of policy limitations, and unjustifiably low settlement offers.²

The company that had been rated “Superior” in its ability to meet its obligations was doing everything in its power to avoid meeting this one.

The Millers, already reeling from the damage to their home, were now fighting a war of attrition against the very company they had paid to protect them.

For me, it was a moment of professional and personal crisis.

My advice, based on the industry’s most respected metric, had led my friends into a nightmare.

Their story was a brutal lesson: a stellar financial rating, while important, was only a small part of the picture.

It was a measure of the company’s ability to pay, but it said absolutely nothing about its willingness to pay fairly and promptly.⁴

I had inspected the company’s shiny façade and declared it sound, never thinking to check the plumbing and wiring within.

That failure forced me to question everything I thought I knew and to develop a new, more complete way of evaluating an insurer’s true worth.

Part 2: The Inspector’s Toolkit – A Three-Dimensional Framework for Evaluating Insurers

The Millers’ ordeal was my catalyst.

I realized that choosing an insurance company is like buying a house.

A beautiful exterior can hide a crumbling foundation, and a fresh coat of paint can conceal faulty wiring.

A smart homebuyer hires a professional inspector to look beyond the curb appeal and assess the home’s true condition.

Similarly, a savvy insurance buyer must look beyond the shiny “A” rating and conduct a thorough, multi-dimensional inspection of the company.

This realization led to the development of the “Insurer Inspection Framework,” an approach that evaluates a company across three critical dimensions, much like a home inspector examines a property’s structure, systems, and legal documents.⁵

1. The Foundation (Financial Solvency): This is the bedrock. Does the company have the financial strength to withstand a catastrophic event, like a major hurricane or an economic recession? This is where we analyze the financial strength ratings from agencies like A.M. Best and S&P. A weak foundation puts the entire structure at risk of collapse.⁶
2. The Systems (Operational Integrity): This is the plumbing, electrical, and HVAC of the company. Do the internal processes work for the policyholder? This dimension assesses the company’s character and its track record of treating customers fairly. We inspect this by analyzing customer complaint data from regulatory bodies and satisfaction surveys from independent researchers. A company with a solid foundation but faulty systems will leave you in the cold when you need it most—just as the Millers were left with a flood and a fight.⁷
3. The Blueprint (The Policy Contract): This is the legal deed and architectural plan for the house. What are the precise terms, conditions, and—most critically—the exclusions that define the insurer’s promise? The policy is the ultimate source of truth. An insurer’s promise is only as good as the paper it’s written on. Misunderstanding the blueprint means you might discover, only after a loss, that what you thought was a master suite is actually an unfinished attic.⁸

The Millers’ insurer had a rock-solid foundation but fundamentally broken systems.

My mistake, and the mistake millions of consumers make, was in believing that inspecting the foundation alone was enough.

True confidence only comes from a comprehensive inspection of all three dimensions.

Part 3: Inspecting the Foundation – A Deep Dive into Financial Strength Ratings

3.1 What is a Financial Strength Rating (FSR)?

The first step in our inspection is to assess the foundation.

A Financial Strength Rating (FSR) is an independent agency’s opinion of an insurance company’s financial health and its ability to meet its ongoing contractual obligations to policyholders.⁹

Think of it as a stress test.

The rating agencies evaluate whether an insurer has enough cash in reserve and sound financial management to pay claims, especially in the face of widespread events like natural disasters or economic downturns that could trigger a surge in claims.⁶

A high rating suggests the company is financially sound and likely to endure, while a low rating could signal future trouble.¹¹

3.2 The Rating Agencies: A Comparative Analysis of the “Inspectors”

There are several “inspectors” you can hire to check an insurer’s foundation, each with its own focus and methodology.

The four most prominent in the United States are A.M. Best, Standard & Poor’s (S&P), Moody’s, and Fitch.⁹

A fifth, Demotech, plays a key role for smaller or newer companies.

• A.M. Best: The “Insurance Specialist.” Founded in 1899, A.M. Best is the oldest and most widely recognized agency that focuses exclusively on the insurance industry.¹² This specialization gives its ratings significant weight. Its methodology is a comprehensive evaluation of a company’s balance sheet strength, operating performance, business profile, and enterprise risk management (ERM)—a measure of how well the company identifies and manages risk.¹⁴ Its FSR scale runs from the highest rating of A++ (Superior) down to D (Poor).⁴
• Standard & Poor’s (S&P): The “Broad Market Analyst.” Unlike the specialist A.M. Best, S&P is one of the “Big Three” global credit rating agencies that assesses businesses and governments across all industries.¹² This gives its analysis a wider economic context. Its Insurer Financial Strength Rating evaluates an insurer’s capacity to meet its financial commitments. The S&P scale ranges from AAA (Extremely Strong) down to D (Default).¹⁸
• Moody’s Investors Service: The “Credit Risk Expert.” Also one of the “Big Three,” Moody’s is renowned for its deep analysis of credit risk across global markets.¹⁷ Its ratings for insurers assess the ability to repay senior policyholder obligations, considering factors like market position, profitability, and capital adequacy.²¹ Its scale for long-term obligations runs from Aaa (Exceptional) down to C (Lowest rated).²¹
• Fitch Ratings: The third member of the “Big Three,” Fitch also provides broad analysis of creditworthiness for companies and governments worldwide, including insurers.¹⁰ Its scale is similar to S&P’s.
• Demotech: The “Niche Specialist.” Demotech plays a crucial role by rating smaller, regional, or newer insurance companies that might not meet the size or history requirements of the larger agencies.¹¹ It focuses on an insurer’s financial stability and its ability to survive economic downturns, making it a valuable resource for evaluating these specific types of carriers.¹²

3.3 The Problem of Different Languages: Translating the Ratings

A significant pitfall for consumers is that each agency uses a similar-looking but distinct rating scale.

This is not an accidental quirk; it’s a fundamental source of confusion that insurers can exploit.

A company might advertise its “A+” rating, but that symbol means very different things depending on the agency.

An “A+” from A.M. Best is its second-highest rating (“Superior”), while an “A+” from S&P or Fitch is their fifth-highest rating (“Strong”).¹⁰

An insurer is naturally inclined to highlight the most favorable rating it has received, making it difficult for consumers to make a true apples-to-apples comparison.²⁶

To cut through this confusion, the following table translates the different rating languages into a single, understandable framework.

Descriptor	A.M. Best	Standard & Poor’s (S&P)	Moody’s
Superior / Exceptional	A++, A+	AAA	Aaa
Excellent / Very Strong	A, A-	AA+, AA, AA-	Aa1, Aa2, Aa3
Good / Strong	B++, B+	A+, A, A-	A1, A2, A3
Adequate / Fair	B, B-	BBB+, BBB, BBB-	Baa1, Baa2, Baa3
Vulnerable / Speculative	C++, C+, C, C-	BB+, BB, B+, B, CCC	Ba1, Ba2, B1, B2, Caa
Poor / In Default	D, E, F, S	CC, C, R, D	Ca, C

This table synthesizes data from multiple sources to provide a comparative overview.

For precise definitions, refer to each agency directly.

¹⁸

3.4 The Cracks in the Foundation: Limitations and Criticisms of the Rating System

A high rating is a crucial starting point, but it is not a guarantee of safety or service.

The rating system has several inherent limitations and has faced significant criticism, particularly in the wake of major financial crises.

• An Opinion, Not a Guarantee: First and foremost, a rating is a forward-looking opinion about an insurer’s financial strength, not a statement of fact or a warranty of future solvency.¹⁰ The agencies themselves make it clear that their ratings should not be the sole basis for a purchasing decision.⁴
• The “Issuer-Pay” Conflict of Interest: This is the system’s most significant structural flaw. Rating agencies are paid by the very insurance companies they evaluate.³⁰ This creates a powerful conflict of interest. An agency might be hesitant to issue a deserved downgrade for fear of losing a client’s business to a more lenient competitor. This dynamic of “ratings shopping” was identified as a major contributor to the 2008 financial crisis, where securities backed by risky mortgages were given unjustifiably high ratings.³² Insurers can, and do, choose which ratings to solicit and publicize, creating an information imbalance that favors the company, not the consumer.³¹
• Lagging Indicators: Ratings are designed for long-term stability and, as a result, often lag behind rapidly changing economic conditions or a company’s deteriorating financial health.³² A company could be taking on excessive risk or facing serious operational issues long before its rating is officially downgraded. By the time the rating changes, it may be too late.
• A Narrow and Incomplete Focus: This is the most critical limitation for a consumer to understand. Financial strength ratings are designed to assess one thing: an insurer’s ability to meet its long-term financial obligations. They do not evaluate customer service, claims processing efficiency, the fairness of settlement offers, or the clarity and equity of the policy contract itself.⁴ A company can be a financial behemoth and still have a corporate culture that treats policyholders with disdain.

3.5 Case Study in Failure: The Collapse of Executive Life Insurance Company

No event illustrates the limitations of the rating system more starkly than the 1991 collapse of Executive Life Insurance Company (ELIC).

For years, ELIC was highly rated by the major agencies, seen as a secure and innovative player in the life insurance market.³⁴

This high rating, however, masked a reckless and ultimately fatal business strategy.

To offer high-yield investment products, ELIC invested heavily in high-risk, high-yield “junk bonds”.³⁵

During the booming 1980s, this strategy fueled dizzying growth.

But when the junk bond market crashed, the value of ELIC’s portfolio plummeted, and the company spiraled into insolvency.³⁶

The failure of Executive Life is the definitive proof that relying on ratings alone is a dangerous gamble.

It highlights every major weakness in the system:

1. Lagging Ratings: The company maintained its high ratings for far too long, failing to reflect the immense risk embedded in its balance sheet. The ratings provided a false sense of security to hundreds of thousands of consumers.³⁴
2. Regulatory Gaps: State regulators lacked the timely information and specific authority needed to rein in ELIC’s risky investment strategy before it was too late.³⁵
3. Devastating Consequences: The collapse was the largest in insurance history at the time, freezing the assets of over 900,000 policyholders and annuitants across the nation.³⁵ People who had invested their life savings discovered overnight that their “secure” policies were in jeopardy.

The story of Executive Life is a crucial lesson.

It demonstrates that a company’s management philosophy and appetite for risk—qualitative factors not always perfectly captured by a rating—can bring down even the most highly-rated institution.

It proves, in the most concrete terms, why you must look beyond the foundation and inspect the rest of the house.

Part 4: Checking the Plumbing & Wiring – Gauging an Insurer’s True Character

A solid foundation is meaningless if the plumbing leaks and the wiring is faulty.

After confirming an insurer’s financial stability, the next critical step is to inspect its operational integrity.

How does the company actually behave? Does it honor its promises, or does it fight its customers at every turn? To answer this, we turn to two powerful tools that measure an insurer’s true character.

4.1 The Most Important Tool You’re Not Using: The NAIC Complaint Index

The National Association of Insurance Commissioners (NAIC) is the U.S. standard-setting and regulatory support organization created and governed by the chief insurance regulators from the 50 states, the District of Columbia, and five U.S. territories.³⁷

Among its many consumer resources is a powerful database that tracks complaints filed against insurance companies.

This data is distilled into a single, invaluable metric: the National Complaint Index.

How the Index is Calculated

The genius of the NAIC Complaint Index is that it allows for a fair, apples-to-apples comparison between companies of different sizes.

A large national carrier will naturally receive more total complaints than a small regional one.

The index accounts for this by calculating a ratio based on market share.³⁸

The formula is straightforward: a company’s percentage of total complaints in a given market is divided by its percentage of total premiums written in that same market.³⁹

Decoding the Score

The resulting index number is easy to interpret:

• A score of 1.00 represents the national average. A company with a 1.00 index has a complaint level that is exactly proportional to its size.⁴⁰
• A score below 1.00 is a positive sign. It indicates the company receives fewer complaints than would be expected for its market share.⁴¹
• A score above 1.00 is a red flag. It means the company generates a disproportionately high number of complaints relative to its size.⁴⁰
• A score of 0.00 is the best possible score, indicating that no complaints were received for the company during the reporting period.⁴⁰

The following table provides a simple framework for action based on a company’s score.

NAIC Index Score	Meaning	Consumer Action
> 2.00	Significantly more complaints than average	Proceed with Extreme Caution. A high score suggests a pattern of customer dissatisfaction.
1.01 – 2.00	More complaints than average	Investigate Further. This is a warning sign that warrants a closer look at the types of complaints.
1.00	Average number of complaints	Neutral. The company performs at the industry median.
0.50 – 0.99	Fewer complaints than average	Positive Indicator. Suggests better-than-average customer service and claims handling.
< 0.50	Significantly fewer complaints than average	Strong Positive Indicator. A sign of excellent operational performance.

How to Use the Tool

The NAIC makes this data publicly available through its Consumer Insurance Search (CIS) tool on its website.⁴²

To find a company’s report, you can search by the company name.

The results will often include a link to a report showing the complaint index for various lines of business (e.g., auto, homeowners) over the past several years.⁴³

This allows you to see not only the current score but also the trend over time.

4.2 The Voice of the Customer: J.D. Power and Satisfaction Data

While the NAIC index measures negative experiences (complaints), other third-party organizations measure the overall customer experience.

J.D. Power is one of the most well-known, conducting annual studies on customer satisfaction with insurance companies, including specific studies on the property claims experience.¹²

These studies survey thousands of customers and rank insurers on factors like communication, ease of the claims process, and fairness of the settlement.⁴⁴

The results provide another crucial layer of insight, revealing the gap that can exist between financial strength and service quality.

For example, the 2025 Property Claims Satisfaction Study found that a primary driver of dissatisfaction was slow service, with the average claim taking 44 days for final payment.⁴⁴

When a company consistently ranks near the bottom of these satisfaction surveys, it’s a clear signal of systemic problems in its claims department, regardless of how high its financial rating may be.

Companies like Safeco and Homesite, for instance, were ranked at the bottom for home insurance claims satisfaction in the 2025 study.⁴⁴

A diligent consumer should cross-reference these satisfaction rankings with financial ratings and NAIC data to get a complete picture.

4.3 Stories from the Trenches: When A-Rated Insurers Deny, Delay, and Defend

Data and indices are powerful, but they can feel abstract.

The true cost of a company’s poor operational integrity is measured in the lives of its policyholders.

The following stories, based on real-world accounts, illustrate the human consequences behind a high complaint index or a low satisfaction score.

• The “Experimental” Treatment Denial: A family has a health insurance policy with a major, A-rated national carrier. When a family member is diagnosed with a rare form of cancer, their oncologist recommends a specific immunotherapy treatment as their best chance for survival. The insurer denies the claim, labeling the well-documented therapy as “experimental”.³ The family is forced to drain their savings and borrow against their home to pay for the treatment, all while battling both a terminal illness and the company they trusted to help them.
• The Lowball Offer and Delay Tactics: A family’s home is devastated by a fire. Their A-rated homeowners’ insurer sends an adjuster who seems to document everything, but then the delays begin. The company makes an initial offer that is a fraction of the cost to rebuild. When the family objects, they are met with endless requests for receipts for every item they owned, a tactic designed to exhaust them into accepting the lowball offer.² Their lives are in ashes, and their insurance company is haggling over the price of their children’s clothes.
• The Pre-existing Condition Dodge: A professional, a CPA, is diagnosed with brain cancer and can no longer perform the duties of their job. They file a claim on their individual long-term disability policy, for which they have faithfully paid premiums for years. After months of review, the A-rated insurer denies the claim, stating that the policyholder has no restrictions that prevent them from doing “light strength level work”—a completely different standard than the “own-occupation” definition in the policy.⁴⁶ The company’s business model appears to be built on denying valid claims, knowing that sick and financially stressed individuals may not have the energy or resources to fight back.

These stories are not isolated incidents.

They are the tangible reality behind the numbers.

They show that a company’s character—its willingness to act in good faith—is a distinct and vital attribute that must be inspected just as rigorously as its balance sheet.

Part 5: Reading the Blueprint – The Policy Is the Ultimate Source of Truth

You can have a financially sound insurer with a great service reputation, but none of it matters if the loss you suffer isn’t actually covered by your contract.

The final and most crucial part of the inspection is to read the blueprint: the insurance policy itself.

This legal document is the ultimate rulebook that governs the relationship between you and the insurer.

It, and only it, defines the promises being made.⁸

5.1 The Anatomy of an Insurance Policy

While they can seem dense and intimidating, most insurance policies are built from the same core components.

Understanding this structure makes them far easier to navigate.⁴⁷

The four basic parts are:

1. The Declarations Page
2. The Insuring Agreement
3. The Exclusions
4. The Conditions

Many policies also include a Definitions section and Endorsements or Riders that modify the original contract.⁸

5.2 The Declarations Page: Your Policy’s “Table of Contents”

The Declarations Page, or “dec page,” is your best friend.

It’s typically the first page of the policy and provides a concise summary of the most critical information specific to you.⁴⁸

This is your go-to reference for answering key questions.

It should clearly state:

• Who and What is Insured: Your name, address, and the specific property (home, vehicle VIN) or individuals covered.⁴⁹
• Policy Period: The exact dates your coverage begins and ends.⁵¹
• Coverage Limits: The maximum amount the insurer will pay for different types of losses (e.g., liability limits of $100,000/$300,000/$50,000).⁵⁰
• Deductibles: The amount you must pay out-of-pocket for a claim before the insurer’s coverage kicks in.⁴⁸
• Premium: The cost of the policy, often broken down by coverage type.⁵¹

Always review your dec page carefully for accuracy when you purchase or renew a policy.

5.3 The Insuring Agreement: The Insurer’s Core Promise

This section contains the fundamental promise of the insurer.

It outlines the broad categories of losses the company agrees to cover.⁸

Insuring agreements generally come in two forms:

• Named-Perils Coverage: The policy only covers losses caused by the specific perils (e.g., fire, wind, hail, theft) listed in the agreement. If a peril is not listed, it is not covered.
• All-Risk (or Open-Perils) Coverage: This is broader. The policy covers losses from all causes except for those that are specifically excluded. If a loss is not excluded, it is covered.⁸

5.4 The Exclusions: Where True Risk Hides

This is arguably the most important section of the policy for a consumer to read and understand.

The Insuring Agreement makes a broad promise, and the Exclusions section takes parts of that promise away.⁴⁷

The true value of your policy is defined as much by what it excludes as by what it covers.

Crucially, exclusions are almost never listed on the user-friendly declarations page; you must dig into the main policy document to find them.⁵¹

Common exclusions in a standard homeowners policy, for example, include damage from flood, earthquake, nuclear hazard, and intentional acts.⁸

If you live in a flood-prone area, knowing that your standard policy excludes flood damage is non-negotiable information.

A policy with broad or unexpected exclusions can create dangerous gaps in your protection, leaving you exposed to catastrophic financial risk.

5.5 Conditions and Definitions: The Rules You Must Follow

Finally, two other sections dictate how the policy functions:

• Conditions: These are the rules of the road. The Conditions section outlines your duties and obligations as a policyholder. If you fail to meet these conditions, the insurer may have grounds to deny your claim. Common conditions include your duty to provide prompt notice of a loss, protect the property from further damage, and cooperate with the insurer’s investigation.⁸
• Definitions: Never skip the definitions section. Insurance is a legal contract, and words may have very specific meanings that differ from their everyday usage. This section defines key terms used throughout the policy (e.g., “occurrence,” “business,” “insured location”). Understanding these definitions is essential to understanding the scope of your coverage.⁴⁷

Part 6: Conclusion – Your Comprehensive Insurer Inspection Checklist

Choosing an insurance company is one of the most significant financial decisions you will make.

It is a long-term promise that you may depend upon at the most vulnerable moment of your life.

The conventional wisdom of relying solely on a financial rating is dangerously incomplete.

It is like buying a house based on a single photo of its front porch.

The A-rated illusion—the belief that financial strength equals trustworthiness—leaves consumers exposed.

True confidence comes not from a single letter grade, but from a diligent, multi-dimensional inspection.

By adopting the mindset of a home inspector, you can look beyond the façade and assess the insurer’s true quality.

Here is your comprehensive checklist for inspecting any potential insurance company:

1. Inspect the Foundation (Financial Solvency)

• Check Multiple Agencies: Look up the insurer’s Financial Strength Rating from at least two major agencies, such as A.M. Best (the insurance specialist) and S&P (the broad market analyst).²⁵
• Translate the Language: Use the Comparative Rating Scales Table in this report to understand what the ratings actually mean. Don’t be misled by an “A” rating that isn’t from the top tier.
• Set a Benchmark: Look for companies in the “Secure” range. As a general rule, this means a rating of A- or better from A.M. Best or BBB or better from S&P.

2. Check the Systems (Operational Integrity)

• Consult the NAIC: Use the NAIC’s Consumer Insurance Search tool to find the company’s national Complaint Index.⁴²
• Analyze the Score: Compare the company’s index to the national median of 1.00. A score consistently below 1.00 is a strong positive signal. A score consistently above 1.00 is a significant red flag.
• Review Customer Satisfaction: Search for the company’s ranking in recent J.D. Power customer satisfaction and claims satisfaction studies. Consistent low rankings are a clear warning sign of poor service.

3. Read the Blueprint (Contractual Reality)

• Get the Policy First: Request a sample policy document before you commit to buying.
• Start with the “Dec Page”: Review the Declarations Page to confirm that the limits, deductibles, covered property, and premiums are all correct and meet your needs.⁴⁸
• Go Straight to the Exclusions: This is the most critical step. Read the Exclusions section carefully. Do these exclusions create significant gaps in the coverage you require for your specific situation? Are there any surprises?
• Understand Your Duties: Briefly review the Conditions section to understand what will be required of you if you need to file a claim.

An insurance policy is more than a transaction; it is a trust agreement.

Do not be swayed by a shiny façade or clever marketing.

Be a diligent inspector.

By examining the foundation, the systems, and the blueprint, you can move beyond the A-rated illusion and choose an insurer that is not only built to last but is also built to serve.

Works cited

1. The AM Best rating system and why it should matter to insurance customers – HiRoad, accessed July 27, 2025, https://www.hiroad.com/blog/insurance/am-best-rating-system
2. 10 Worst Insurance Companies | Bachus & Schanker, accessed July 27, 2025, https://www.coloradolaw.net/insurance-industry-10-worst-deny-claims/
3. Client Stories Of Their Insurer’s Bad Faith Tactics | Doug Terry Law, accessed July 27, 2025, https://www.dougterrylaw.com/client-stories/
4. GUIDE TO BEST’S FINANCIAL STRENGTH RATINGS – (FSR) – AM Best, accessed July 27, 2025, https://www.ambest.com/ratings/guide.pdf
5. Analogies Between Complex Systems and Phases of Matter – DSpace@MIT, accessed July 27, 2025, https://dspace.mit.edu/handle/1721.1/102923
6. Guide to Understanding the Ratings Given to Insurance Companies – Berxi, accessed July 27, 2025, https://www.berxi.com/resources/articles/insurer-rating-meaning/
7. Insurance Company Ratings: What They Are & How They Work – HUB Financial Services, accessed July 27, 2025, https://hubfinservices.com/insurance-company-ratings/
8. Understanding Your Insurance Policy | Department of Insurance, SC – Official Website, accessed July 27, 2025, https://doi.sc.gov/957/Understanding-Your-Insurance-Policy
9. www.annuityadvantage.com, accessed July 27, 2025, https://www.annuityadvantage.com/resources/insurance-company-ratings-explained/#:~:text=Because%20an%20insurance%20company’s%20ratings,%26%20Poor’s%2C%20Moody’s%20and%20Fitch.
10. Insurance Company Credit Rating: Overview and Examples – Investopedia, accessed July 27, 2025, https://www.investopedia.com/terms/i/insurance-company-credit-rating.asp
11. A-Rated Insurance Companies: What Are They, and Why Do They Matter?, accessed July 27, 2025, https://www.cunninghamgroupins.com/news/what-is-an-a-rated-insurance-company-and-why-is-it-important-for-physicians-to-be-insured-by-one/
12. Insurance Company Ratings Explained | Bankrate, accessed July 27, 2025, https://www.bankrate.com/insurance/car/company-ratings/
13. AM Best: Definition, History, and How Rating System Works – Investopedia, accessed July 27, 2025, https://www.investopedia.com/terms/a/a-m-best.asp
14. Insurance company ratings – Professional Roofing, accessed July 27, 2025, https://www.professionalroofing.net/WebExclusives/Story/Insurance-company-ratings–01-01-2008/127
15. What are AM Best Ratings? – Bankrate, accessed July 27, 2025, https://www.bankrate.com/insurance/am-best/
16. What Are AM Best Ratings and NAIC Numbers? | Video – Business Credentialing Services, accessed July 27, 2025, https://www.getbcs.com/en/university/am-best-ratings
17. Moody’s Ratings – Wikipedia, accessed July 27, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Moody%27s_Ratings
18. – Standard & Poors Rating System — ImmediateAnnuities.com, accessed July 27, 2025, https://www.immediateannuities.com/insurance-company-ratings/sp.html
19. What are Standard & Poor’s (S&P) Ratings? – Bankrate, accessed July 27, 2025, https://www.bankrate.com/insurance/s-and-p/
20. Moody’s Ratings – Policygenius, accessed July 27, 2025, https://www.policygenius.com/life-insurance/moodys-ratings/
21. – Moodys Financial Ratings System — ImmediateAnnuities.com, accessed July 27, 2025, https://www.immediateannuities.com/insurance-company-ratings/moodys.html
22. Moody’s Rating Scale and Definitions, accessed July 27, 2025, https://www.moodys.com/sites/products/productattachments/ap075378_1_1408_ki.pdf
23. What are the biggest insurance rating companies in the US and why do their ratings matter?, accessed July 27, 2025, https://www.insurancebusinessmag.com/us/guides/what-are-the-biggest-insurance-rating-companies-in-the-us-and-why-do-their-ratings-matter-539786.aspx
24. How to check an insurer’s financial strength – United Policyholders, accessed July 27, 2025, https://uphelp.org/buying-tips/how-to-check-an-insurers-financial-strength/
25. How to assess the financial strength of an insurance company | III, accessed July 27, 2025, https://www.iii.org/article/how-to-assess-the-financial-strength-of-an-insurance-company
26. S&P Insurer Financial Strength Ratings: Meaning, Criticism – Investopedia, accessed July 27, 2025, https://www.investopedia.com/terms/s/sp-claims-paying-ability-rating.asp
27. Insurance Company Ratings Explained – AnnuityAdvantage, accessed July 27, 2025, https://www.annuityadvantage.com/resources/insurance-company-ratings-explained/
28. Guide to Best’s Financial Strength Ratings 090109, accessed July 27, 2025, https://risk.nv.gov/uploadedfiles/risknvgov/content/Contracts/AMbestGuideToFinancialStrengthRatings.pdf
29. Guide to Best’s Credit Ratings, accessed July 27, 2025, https://www3.ambest.com/ambv/ratingmethodology/OpenPDF.aspx?ri=1660
30. What Are Life Insurance Company Ratings? – Western & Southern Financial Group, accessed July 27, 2025, https://www.westernsouthern.com/life-insurance/life-insurance-company-ratings
31. Dealing with the conflicts of interest of credit rating agencies: a balanced cure for the disease – Oxford Academic, accessed July 27, 2025, https://academic.oup.com/cmlj/article/17/3/334/6609964
32. Insurance Topics | Rating Agencies – NAIC, accessed July 27, 2025, https://content.naic.org/insurance-topics/rating-agencies
33. Credit Ratings in Insurance Regulation: The Missing Piece of Financial Reform, accessed July 27, 2025, https://scholarlycommons.law.wlu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?referer=&httpsredir=1&article=3304&context=wlulr
34. Guaranteeing Disaster | Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis, accessed July 27, 2025, https://www.minneapolisfed.org/article/1993/guaranteeing-disaster
35. The Failures of Four Large Life Insurers – GAO, accessed July 27, 2025, https://www.gao.gov/assets/t-ggd-92-13.pdf
36. The Fall of First Executive: Who Is to Blame? – The Systems Thinker, accessed July 27, 2025, https://thesystemsthinker.com/the-fall-of-first-executive-who-is-to-blame/
37. National Association of Insurance Commissioners (NAIC) – Investopedia, accessed July 27, 2025, https://www.investopedia.com/terms/n/nainsurancec.asp
38. Consumers Complained the Most About These Insurance Companies in 2024, Report Says | Insurify – InsuranceNewsNet, accessed July 27, 2025, https://insurancenewsnet.com/oarticle/consumers-complained-the-most-about-these-insurance-companies-in-2024-report-says-insurify
39. 2018 Consumer Complaints Report – Illinois Department of Insurance, accessed July 27, 2025, https://idoi.illinois.gov/content/dam/soi/en/web/insurance/reports/reports/2018-complaint-ratios.pdf
40. Insurance Complaint Reports | DORA – Colorado Division of Insurance, accessed July 27, 2025, https://doi.colorado.gov/for-consumers/consumer-resources/insurance-complaint-reports
41. What Is an NAIC Number? – Insurantly, accessed July 27, 2025, https://www.insurantly.com/what-is-an-naic-number/
42. Consumer – NAIC, accessed July 27, 2025, https://content.naic.org/consumer
43. Consumer Insurance Refined Search Results – NAIC, accessed July 27, 2025, https://www.naic.org/cis_refined_results.htm?TABLEAU=CIS…
44. J.D. Power’s best and worst home insurance companies of 2025 for …, accessed July 27, 2025, https://www.insurance.com/home-and-renters-insurance/coverage/j.d.-power-names-best-and-worst-insurers-for-property-claims.html
45. Sickest patients face insurance denials despite policy fixes: “They won’t help me”, accessed July 27, 2025, https://www.cbsnews.com/news/health-insurance-denials-prior-authorization-policy/
46. Lessons I learned from my Long Term Disability Insurance denial – Reddit, accessed July 27, 2025, https://www.reddit.com/r/personalfinance/comments/1he8cn5/lessons_i_learned_from_my_long_term_disability/
47. How to Read an Insurance Policy | Nonprofit Risk Management Center, accessed July 27, 2025, https://nonprofitrisk.org/resources/how-to-read-an-insurance-policy/
48. Understanding your insurance policy’s declarations page – Higginbotham, accessed July 27, 2025, https://www.higginbotham.com/blog/insurance-declarations-page/
49. Understanding Your Declaration Page – Kemper, accessed July 27, 2025, https://cloud.kemper.com/en/resources/insurance-insights/understanding-your-declaration-page
50. What Is an Auto Insurance Declarations Page? – Allstate, accessed July 27, 2025, https://www.allstate.com/resources/car-insurance/car-insurance-declarations-page
51. What Is an Insurance Declaration Page? | Bankrate, accessed July 27, 2025, https://www.bankrate.com/insurance/homeowners-insurance/insurance-declaration-page/