The Paramedic’s Shield: A Definitive Guide to Malpractice Insurance and Career Protection

The call came in as a multi-vehicle collision on the interstate, a chaotic jumble of metal and trauma under the strobing red and blue lights.

For 15 years, scenes like this had been my office.

I was the calm in the storm, the lead paramedic who could triage, stabilize, and transport with a focus that bordered on instinct.

We worked three critical patients that night, a symphony of controlled urgency—splinting, IVs, airway management, a rapid transport for a C-spine injury.

We followed our protocols to the letter.

We saved lives.

I went home exhausted but satisfied, another tough shift in the books.

Sixteen months later, a certified letter arrived.

I was being sued.

The complaint was a dizzying mix of allegations: delayed response, improper patient handling, failure to recognize the severity of an injury.

It felt like a personal attack, a distortion of a night where my team and I had given everything.

I assumed my employer’s insurance would handle it, that this was just a procedural nightmare.

But as the process unfolded, a terrifying reality began to sink in.

The lawyers provided by my service were there to protect the company first and foremost.

My personal license, my reputation, and my family’s financial security felt like secondary concerns.

I was shielded on the scene, but utterly exposed in the system.

This experience sent me down a rabbit hole of research, consultation, and late-night anxiety.

I was an expert in pre-hospital medicine, but a complete novice when it came to the legal and financial architecture of my own profession.

The biggest pain point was that despite following all the “standard advice”—be a good medic, document well, trust your employer—I was still profoundly vulnerable.

The real turning point came when I discovered a concept from the seemingly unrelated field of aviation safety: the “Swiss Cheese Model” of accident causation.¹

The model proposes that disasters rarely happen because of a single catastrophic failure.

Instead, they occur when the holes in multiple layers of defense line up perfectly, allowing a hazard to pass straight through.

Suddenly, I had a new way to see the problem.

Relying solely on my employer’s policy was like having only one slice of cheese—a slice with plenty of holes.

True professional safety, I realized, wasn’t about a single, perfect shield.

It was about building a multi-layered defense system where each layer backs up the others.

This guide is the culmination of that journey.

It is the report I wish I had when that letter arrived.

We will deconstruct the real risks you face on every shift, analyze the first, flawed layer of defense your employer provides, and then, step-by-step, show you how to build your own personal, multi-layered shield.

This isn’t just about insurance; it’s about taking control of your professional destiny and ensuring you can continue to answer the call without fear.

Part I: Deconstructing the Modern Risk Environment for Paramedics

To build an effective defense, one must first understand the nature of the attack.

For paramedics, the threat of a lawsuit is not a single, well-defined risk but a complex and dynamic environment.

The public perception of malpractice often centers on a dramatic clinical mistake, but the reality is that liability can arise from any number of facets of a paramedic’s duties, often in combination.

The Anatomy of a Malpractice Claim: More Than Just Clinical Errors

A lawsuit against a paramedic rarely hinges on a single, isolated event.

Instead, it typically weaves a narrative of systemic failure, attacking multiple aspects of the care provided.

The most common sources of these claims can be broken down into several key categories.

• Errors of Commission: This is the most straightforward category, involving an action performed incorrectly. Examples include administering the wrong medication or an improper dose, misplacing an endotracheal tube into the esophagus instead of the trachea, or improperly handling a patient with a suspected spinal injury, thereby exacerbating the condition.³ These are active mistakes made during treatment.
• Errors of Omission: Equally dangerous are the failures to perform a necessary action. This can include failing to recognize a life-threatening condition during assessment, neglecting to check that a defibrillator’s batteries are charged, not adequately stabilizing a patient for transport, or failing to bring essential equipment to the scene.⁵ These omissions suggest a lapse in diligence and protocol.
• System and Process Failures: Often, the root cause of patient harm lies not in a single medic’s hands but in the system they operate within. Delayed response times are a frequent allegation, with plaintiffs arguing that the delay worsened a patient’s outcome.⁸ Malfunctioning or improperly maintained equipment, from a faulty gurney to an empty oxygen tank, can lead directly to injury.¹⁰ Furthermore, poor documentation and breakdowns in communication during the handoff to hospital staff can create dangerous continuity-of-care gaps, making it difficult to defend the actions taken in the field.³
• Scope of Practice Violations: Liability can arise from both overstepping and failing to act within one’s licensed scope. Performing a procedure for which one is not trained or certified is a clear violation.¹³ Conversely, failing to perform a necessary intervention that
  is within one’s scope can also be grounds for negligence. A particularly stark case involved an EMT who declared a preterm baby “non-viable,” a determination that was beyond their scope of practice. The baby was later found to have a heartbeat at the hospital but suffered fatal brain damage due to the delay in resuscitation, leading to a $1 million settlement.¹⁴

What becomes clear is that the legal threat to a paramedic is rarely a single point of failure.

It is a “synergy of risk” where multiple factors in a high-stress call can compound each other.

A seemingly minor documentation error can cripple the defense of an otherwise sound clinical decision.

A delayed response time, even if unavoidable, can magnify the perceived consequences of a subsequent treatment choice.

A plaintiff’s attorney will not just target one action; they will scrutinize the entire chain of events—from dispatch to hospital handoff—searching for any weakness to construct a compelling story of negligence.

This means a paramedic’s defense is only as strong as its weakest link, powerfully validating the Swiss Cheese Model.

Multiple small holes—a rushed report, a slightly delayed arrival, a piece of aging equipment—can align to create a trajectory for a successful lawsuit.

This reality elevates the importance of an insurance policy that provides a holistic defense, covering not just the primary medical allegation but also attacks on licensure and documentation practices.³

The Legal Gauntlet: Understanding the Standard of Care

At the heart of every malpractice claim is the concept of the “standard of care.” To win a lawsuit, a plaintiff must successfully prove four distinct elements ¹⁶:

1. Duty: The paramedic had a professional duty to provide care to the patient.
2. Breach: The paramedic breached that duty by failing to meet the established standard of care.
3. Causation: This breach of duty was the direct and proximate cause of the patient’s injury.
4. Damages: The patient suffered actual harm, whether physical, emotional, or financial.

The most contentious of these is almost always the “breach.” The standard of care is defined as the level of quality and care that a similarly skilled and knowledgeable paramedic would have provided under similar circumstances.⁵

This is not a standard of perfection; it is a standard of reasonableness.

However, what is “reasonable” can be a matter of intense debate between opposing expert witnesses in a courtroom.

Further complicating matters are the varying legal standards across different jurisdictions.

While most states apply a standard of ordinary negligence, some provide statutory protections for EMS personnel, requiring a plaintiff to prove a much higher level of misconduct.

A “gross negligence” standard, for instance, requires showing a conscious and voluntary disregard for the need to use reasonable care.⁶

An even higher bar is the

“willful and wanton” standard, which requires proving that the paramedic acted with reckless disregard for the risk of harm, essentially choosing not to provide proper care.⁵

While these higher standards offer some level of protection, they are not universal and should never be a substitute for robust insurance coverage.

Part II: The Employer’s Coverage — A Necessary but Incomplete Defense

For most paramedics, the first and only line of defense they consider is the professional liability policy provided by their employer.

This coverage is crucial and forms the foundational layer of protection.

However, viewing it as a complete and total shield is a dangerous misconception.

This first slice of cheese is designed with a specific purpose in mind, and its inherent structure contains significant holes that can leave an individual paramedic dangerously exposed.

The First Slice of Cheese: What Employer Insurance is Designed to Do

Nearly every EMS agency, fire department, or hospital provides its paramedics with professional liability insurance.⁸

The primary purpose of this policy is to protect the

organization’s assets.

Under the legal doctrine of respondeat superior (“let the master answer”), employers are held liable for the negligent acts of their employees committed within the scope of their employment.¹⁰

Because the organization is the entity with the “deep pockets,” it is the primary target in a lawsuit.²⁰

The insurance policy, therefore, is structured to defend the company against these claims and pay for any resulting settlements or judgments, thereby protecting the organization’s financial stability.

While this coverage extends to the employee, its ultimate loyalty and design philosophy are centered on the institution.

Identifying the Holes: Critical Gaps in Employer-Provided Policies

Understanding the limitations of employer-provided coverage is the first step toward building a truly resilient professional shield.

These policies contain several structural gaps that can become critical vulnerabilities during a legal challenge.

• Shared Policy Limits: An employer’s policy has a set coverage limit, for example, $1 million per claim and a $3 million annual aggregate limit for all claims filed against the organization in a year.²² This aggregate limit is a shared pool of money for
  all employees covered under the policy. If several large claims are filed against different employees in a single year, this pool can be significantly depleted or even exhausted. In a worst-case scenario, a paramedic involved in a late-year incident could find themselves with little to no coverage left to protect them.²²
• Coverage Gaps for Outside Activities: The protection offered by an employer’s policy is strictly tied to duties performed for that specific employer. It does not cover professional activities outside of that job. This leaves a paramedic uninsured if a claim arises from volunteer work, moonlighting for another service, or even giving informal medical advice to a friend or neighbor that results in harm.²²
• Lack of Portability: Employer coverage is not portable. The moment a paramedic leaves a job, that protection ceases. Given that malpractice claims are often filed many months or even years after an incident, this creates a perilous liability gap.²² A paramedic could leave Job A, start at Job B, and then be sued for an incident that occurred at Job A, only to find that neither policy will cover them.
• No Personal License Protection: A lawsuit is not the only threat to a paramedic’s career. A patient complaint, even one without legal merit, can trigger an investigation by the state licensing board. The legal costs associated with defending one’s license—the very document that allows one to practice—are often not covered by an employer’s policy. This is a personal, professional threat that requires a personal defense.¹⁵

These gaps reveal a fundamental misalignment.

Employer insurance is designed to protect a static organization, while a modern paramedic’s career is often dynamic, involving multiple employers and outside activities.

This brings to light a deeper, more troubling vulnerability: the “conflict of interest” chasm.

When a lawsuit names both the paramedic and the employer, they become co-defendants, typically represented by the same legal team appointed by the employer’s insurer.

However, the insurer’s primary fiduciary duty is to its client—the employer.²⁴

This creates a structural conflict of interest.

The quickest and most cost-effective solution for the

company might be to settle the case, which could involve admitting a degree of fault that becomes a permanent mark on the paramedic’s professional record.

In a more severe scenario, the company’s best legal strategy might be to distance itself from the employee’s actions, arguing that the paramedic acted negligently and violated established protocols.²⁰

In this “rogue employee” defense, the interests of the employer and the employee become directly opposed.

The paramedic, who believed they were covered, suddenly finds themselves without an advocate whose sole loyalty is to their personal and professional well-being.

This potential for conflict makes it clear that a personal malpractice policy is not merely “extra” insurance.

It is the only mechanism to guarantee access to a legal defense team with an undivided loyalty to the individual practitioner, ensuring their voice is heard and their interests are paramount.⁸

Part III: Forging Your Personal Armor — A Layered Defense System

Recognizing the limitations of employer coverage is not a cause for despair, but a call to action.

It is the moment a paramedic transitions from being a passive subject of their employer’s risk management strategy to the active architect of their own career protection.

By applying the Swiss Cheese Model, we can systematically build a robust, multi-layered defense that accounts for the realities of the profession.

Applying the Swiss Cheese Model to Your Career

A catastrophic failure—whether an aviation disaster or a career-ending lawsuit—is rarely the result of a single error.

It occurs when the holes in successive layers of defense align.

A proactive paramedic understands this and works to strengthen each layer.

• Layer 1: Clinical Excellence & Scope Adherence: The first layer is foundational. It involves a commitment to continuous education, staying current with protocols, and maintaining a deep, unwavering understanding of one’s scope of practice. This minimizes the chance of an initial error occurring.¹⁰
• Layer 2: Meticulous Documentation: The patient care report is often the single most important piece of evidence in a lawsuit. A clear, accurate, objective, and complete report can stop a potential claim before it starts. This layer serves as a powerful defense by creating an unambiguous record of the care provided.³
• Layer 3: Employer’s Insurance: This is the baseline institutional layer. While flawed, it provides the initial, broad coverage against major claims and protects the organization that supports your practice.
• Layer 4: Personal Malpractice Insurance: This is the critical, personally controlled layer. It is designed to plug the holes left by the other layers—covering license defense, off-duty activities, and ensuring loyal legal representation. It is the final and most crucial piece of personal armor.

The Foundational Choice: “Claims-Made” vs. “Occurrence” Policies

When purchasing personal malpractice insurance, the single most important technical decision is choosing between a “claims-made” and an “occurrence” policy.

This choice has profound long-term implications for the continuity of your coverage.

• Occurrence Policies: An occurrence policy provides the most straightforward and comprehensive long-term protection. It covers any incident that occurs during the policy period, regardless of when the claim is eventually filed. If you are insured with an occurrence policy from 2024 to 2025 and are sued in 2028 for an incident from that period, you are covered, even if you canceled the policy years ago. This is often considered the “gold standard” as it provides permanent, lifetime coverage for the period you were insured, eliminating the need for future considerations like tail coverage.²⁹
• Claims-Made Policies: A claims-made policy is more complex. It provides coverage only if the incident happens and the claim is reported to the insurance company while the policy is still active. This creates a significant issue when you change jobs or retire. If you cancel your claims-made policy, your coverage ends completely. To protect yourself from future claims arising from past incidents, you must purchase an endorsement known as “tail coverage”.²⁹
• Tail Coverage (Extended Reporting Period): This is an essential but often expensive add-on to a claims-made policy. When you cancel the policy, you purchase a “tail” that extends the reporting period, allowing you to file claims in the future for incidents that occurred while the policy was active. The cost for tail coverage can be substantial, often ranging from 1.5 to 3 times the final year’s premium, and must be planned for, especially upon retirement.²⁹
• Prior Acts (“Nose”) Coverage: When moving from one claims-made policy to another (e.g., with a new insurer), you can purchase “prior acts” or “nose” coverage on the new policy. This feature sets a “retroactive date,” and the new policy agrees to cover claims from incidents that occurred after that date, effectively picking up the coverage from your old policy and preventing a gap.²⁹

The choice between these two structures is fundamental to managing what can be called the “career lifecycle” blind spot.

A paramedic’s liability risk is not isolated to their current job; it is a cumulative exposure that builds over an entire career.

Standard employer-provided policies, which are typically claims-made and terminate with employment, are fundamentally misaligned with this reality.

They create a “liability lag”—a dangerous period where a paramedic can be sued for a past incident but is no longer covered by their old employer and not yet covered for that incident by their new one.

A portable, personal policy—especially an occurrence policy—acts as a “Career-Long Liability Shield.” It provides a constant, unbroken layer of protection that follows the professional across every job, through every transition, and into retirement, effectively closing this dangerous blind spot.

To clarify this critical decision, the following table provides a direct comparison.

Feature	Claims-Made Policy	Occurrence Policy
How Coverage Is Triggered	The claim must be made and reported to the insurer while the policy is active.	The incident must occur during the policy period, regardless of when the claim is reported.
Cost Trajectory	Starts with a lower premium that increases annually for several years (“step rating”) before leveling off.31	Higher, more stable premium from the start, reflecting the long-term coverage being purchased.32
Portability & Job Changes	Complex. Requires purchasing “tail coverage” from the old insurer or “prior acts” coverage from the new one to avoid gaps.29	Simple. Coverage for the insured period is permanent. No additional purchases are needed when changing jobs.30
Need for Tail Coverage	Yes. Essential upon policy cancellation, retirement, or death to cover past acts. Can be very expensive.34	No. The coverage for the insured period is already permanent and does not require an extended reporting period.30
Simplicity & Peace of Mind	Requires active management and planning for career transitions to avoid potentially catastrophic coverage gaps.	“Set it and forget it.” Provides permanent peace of mind for the time it was active, simplifying career changes and retirement.

Anatomy of a Robust Policy: Core Coverages and Essential Riders

Beyond the foundational choice of policy type, a high-quality personal policy is defined by its specific coverages.

A robust plan should include a comprehensive suite of protections designed for the unique risks of EMS.

Core Coverage:

• Professional Liability: This is the heart of the policy, covering the costs of defending you against a malpractice claim, including attorney fees, court costs, and any resulting settlement or judgment up to the policy limits.³ Standard limits are typically $1 million per claim and $3 million aggregate for the policy year.³
• Defense Costs Outside Limits: This is a critical feature. It means that the cost of your legal defense does not subtract from your liability limit. If you have a $1 million limit and legal fees are $200,000, the full $1 million is still available to pay a potential settlement. Without this, your actual protection is significantly reduced.¹⁵

Essential Riders & Built-in Benefits:

• License Defense: This provides a separate pool of money (e.g., $25,000 to $35,000) to hire legal counsel to defend you in front of a state licensing board, even if no lawsuit is filed. This protects your ability to practice.¹⁵
• HIPAA Defense: Covers the costs and potential fines associated with an alleged violation of patient privacy laws.¹⁵
• Deposition Representation: Pays for an attorney to represent you if you are subpoenaed to give a deposition, even if you are only a witness and not a defendant in the lawsuit.²⁵
• Assault Coverage: If you are assaulted while on duty, this can cover your medical expenses, property damage, and lost wages.²⁵
• Defendant Expense Benefit / Loss of Earnings: Reimburses you for lost wages and other personal expenses (like travel and lodging) incurred while you are required to attend depositions or trial.²⁵
• Good Samaritan Acts: Extends your coverage to situations where you provide emergency care to a non-patient while off-duty.²⁵

Part IV: The Strategic Acquisition — A Step-by-Step Guide to Securing Your Future

Understanding the need for personal malpractice insurance is the first step.

The next is navigating the marketplace to find and secure a policy that provides the robust, layered protection your career deserves.

This requires a strategic approach to selecting a provider, understanding the application process, and asking the right questions.

Navigating the Marketplace: Key Providers

The market for healthcare professional liability insurance includes several established companies and brokers that specialize in this field.

While not an exhaustive list, some of the key players frequently encountered by paramedics include:

• CM&F Group: A long-standing provider that offers comprehensive policies specifically tailored for paramedics and EMTs, often highlighting features like “consent to settle” and portable coverage.¹⁵
• HPSO (Healthcare Providers Service Organization): A well-known insurer in the healthcare space that emphasizes the gaps in employer coverage and the benefits of an individual, portable policy.²⁴
• Berxi: A part of Berkshire Hathaway Specialty Insurance, Berxi partners with companies like GEICO to offer affordable malpractice coverage with a focus on a simple online process.³⁸
• Brokers and Agencies: Companies like Insureon ⁸ and specialized providers like
  XINSURANCE ⁴⁰ can act as brokers, comparing quotes from multiple carriers or offering customized solutions for unique or high-risk situations.

The Quoting Process: What to Expect

Securing a quote for paramedic malpractice insurance has become a streamlined process, with many providers offering real-time online applications.²⁷

To get an accurate quote, you will typically need to provide the following information ³⁸:

• Professional Details: Your specific license (e.g., Paramedic, EMT-B, AEMT).
• Years of Experience: Premiums can be influenced by your time in the field.
• Work Setting: Whether you work for a private ambulance service, a municipal fire department, a hospital-based system, or as an independent contractor.
• Employment Status: Full-time, part-time, or volunteer status can affect rates, with some insurers offering part-time discounts.³⁹
• Claims History: You will need to disclose any prior malpractice claims filed against you.
• Desired Coverage: The liability limits you wish to purchase (e.g., $1M/$3M).

Vetting the Providers: Critical Questions to Ask Your Potential Insurer

Choosing an insurance policy is about more than just finding the lowest price.

It is about entering into a partnership with a company you will depend on during the most stressful period of your professional life.

To move from being a passive buyer to an informed consumer, it is essential to ask targeted, critical questions.

The following checklist is designed to empower you to thoroughly vet any potential insurer and policy.

Category	Critical Question	Why It Matters
Carrier Stability	What is your A.M. Best rating? 43	A.M. Best is the industry standard for rating an insurer’s financial strength. An “A” rating or higher indicates the company is financially stable and will be able to pay claims years into the future.
	Are you an “admitted” or “non-admitted” carrier in my state? 43	Admitted carriers are regulated by the state’s department of insurance and backed by a state guaranty fund, which protects policyholders if the insurer becomes insolvent.
Policy Structure	Is this an “Occurrence” or a “Claims-Made” policy? 45	This is the most fundamental question. It determines whether your coverage is permanent for the insured period or if you will need to manage tail coverage throughout your career.
	If it’s Claims-Made, what is the exact cost of tail coverage? Are there provisions for a free tail upon retirement, death, or disability? 44	Tail coverage is a significant future expense. Knowing the cost upfront and understanding the conditions for a free tail (e.g., age, years with the company) is crucial for long-term financial planning.
Coverage Details	Do legal defense costs erode my liability limits? 15	You want a policy where defense costs are paid in addition to your liability limits. This ensures your full coverage amount is preserved for a potential settlement or judgment.
	What are the separate sub-limits for License Defense, HIPAA Defense, and Deposition Representation? 15	These are critical ancillary benefits. Understanding their specific coverage amounts helps you evaluate the true breadth of the policy’s protection beyond just the core malpractice claim.
Claims Process	Does the policy include an unconditional “consent to settle” clause? 44	This is a non-negotiable feature. It gives you the final say on whether to settle a claim, protecting your professional reputation from a settlement made for business convenience.
	Do you use local law firms that specialize in medical malpractice defense? What is your trial win rate? 44	You want a defense team that understands the local legal landscape and has a proven track record of successfully defending healthcare professionals. This speaks to the quality of the defense you will receive.

Conclusion: From Uncertainty to Fortitude — Owning Your Professional Security

My journey began with the shock and vulnerability of facing a lawsuit, a feeling that my career was at the mercy of forces beyond my control.

It led to an epiphany: professional security is not something that is given to you; it is something you must build for yourself.

The “Swiss Cheese Model” provided the blueprint, transforming my understanding of risk from a single, terrifying threat into a manageable system of layered defenses.

We have deconstructed the modern risk environment, recognizing that liability is a complex synergy of clinical actions, documentation, and systemic pressures.

We have examined the first layer of defense—employer-provided insurance—and seen its essential role, but also its critical holes, particularly the chasm of conflicting interests.

Most importantly, we have laid out the plans for forging your own personal armor: a robust, portable malpractice policy that acts as a career-long shield, closing the dangerous blind spots that exist during job transitions and into retirement.

A personal malpractice insurance policy is not an admission of weakness or a sign of mistrust in your employer.

It is a declaration of professionalism and foresight.

It is the final, essential piece of personal protective equipment in a career spent on the front lines.

Viewing this coverage not as a mere expense, but as a fundamental investment in your longevity, your peace of mind, and your unhindered ability to practice medicine, is the ultimate act of taking ownership of your professional future.

It is the shift from uncertainty to fortitude.

Works cited

1. Reasons Swiss Cheese Model – NHS Wales Performance and Improvement, accessed August 15, 2025, https://performanceandimprovement.nhs.wales/functions/quality-safety-and-improvement/improvement/improvement-cymru-academy/resource-library/academy-toolkit-guides/reasons-swiss-cheese-safety-model-toolkit/
2. Swiss cheese model | EBSCO Research Starters, accessed August 15, 2025, https://www.ebsco.com/research-starters/consumer-health/swiss-cheese-model
3. Malpractice insurance for Paramedics – Get a Quote, accessed August 15, 2025, https://westwood.insure/ambulance-malpractice-insurance/malpractice-insurance-for-paramedics/
4. Paramedic Malpractice Insurance in Massachusetts – Feingold Companies, accessed August 15, 2025, https://feingoldco.com/paramedic-malpractice-insurance-massachusetts/
5. Can Paramedics Be Held Liable for Negligence? | JJS Justice, accessed August 15, 2025, https://www.jjsjustice.com/can-paramedics-be-held-liable-for-negligence/
6. Paramedic Malpractice | Baltimore Medical Malpractice Lawyers – Arfaa Law Group, accessed August 15, 2025, https://www.arfaalawgroup.com/medical-negligence-and-personal-injury/medical-malpractice/other-malpractice/paramedic-malpractice/
7. How Paramedics Cause Medical Malpractice Cases | Tavss Fletcher, accessed August 15, 2025, https://www.tavss.com/library/how-paramedics-cause-medical-malpractice-cases.cfm
8. EMT / Paramedic Liability Insurance: Get Free Quotes – Insureon, accessed August 15, 2025, https://www.insureon.com/healthcare-professionals-business-insurance/emt-paramedics
9. Twenty Minutes? Thirty? Forty? EMS Liability for Delayed Response Times – JEMS, accessed August 15, 2025, https://www.jems.com/ems-operations/ground-ambulance-operations/ems-liability-for-delayed-response-times/
10. EMT & Paramedic Malpractice – Bellotti Law Group, accessed August 15, 2025, https://www.bellottilaw.com/practice-areas/personal-injury/medical-malpractice/emt-paramedic-malpractice/
11. Can You Sue A Paramedic Or EMT For Malpractice?, accessed August 15, 2025, https://www.rossfellercasey.com/news/can-you-sue-a-paramedic-or-emt-for-malpractice/
12. Documentation Legal Liability – JEMS, accessed August 15, 2025, https://www.jems.com/ems-management/legal-issues/documentation-legal-liability/
13. EMT and Paramedic Malpractice – Shelsby & Leoni, P.A., accessed August 15, 2025, https://www.shelsbyleonilaw.com/emt-paramedic-malpractice/
14. EMT Negligence Lawsuit Settles for $1 Million – Lubin & Meyer PC, accessed August 15, 2025, https://www.lubinandmeyer.com/cases/emt-malpractice.html
15. EMT Professional Liability Insurance – CM&F Group, accessed August 15, 2025, https://www.cmfgroup.com/professional-liability-insurance/emergency-services-professional-insurance/emt-insurance/
16. Paramedic & EMT Malpractice Issues | Bachus & Schanker – Personal Injury Lawyers, accessed August 15, 2025, https://www.coloradolaw.net/practice-area/medical-malpractice/paramedic-emt-malpractice-issues/
17. Negligence explained for the EMS professional – EMS1, accessed August 15, 2025, https://www.ems1.com/ems-products/consulting-management-and-legal-services/articles/negligence-explained-for-the-ems-professional-SJyiooSiHtmYsKg8/
18. From the EMS Call to the Courtroom – Virginia Department of Health, accessed August 15, 2025, https://www.vdh.virginia.gov/content/uploads/sites/23/2016/05/LMGT-609.pdf
19. Liability in Malpractice Lawsuits Involving EMTs and Paramedics – AllLaw, accessed August 15, 2025, https://www.alllaw.com/articles/nolo/medical-malpractice/liability-lawsuits-involving-emts-paramedics.html
20. Do you have personal liability insurance outside of your employer? : r/NewToEMS – Reddit, accessed August 15, 2025, https://www.reddit.com/r/NewToEMS/comments/1iigeft/do_you_have_personal_liability_insurance_outside/
21. Can I Sue an EMT or Paramedic for Negligence? | Jason R. Schultz P.C., accessed August 15, 2025, https://www.jasonschultzpc.com/library/can-i-sue-an-emt-or-paramedic-for-negligence-.cfm
22. Employer Coverage Isn’t Enough—Here’s Why You Need Proliability, accessed August 15, 2025, https://www.proliability.com/resources/employer-coverage-isnt-enough-heres-why-you-need-proliability/
23. Malpractice Insurance Basics – AAPA, accessed August 15, 2025, https://www.aapa.org/career-central/practice-tools/malpractice-insurance-basics/
24. HPSO: Malpractice insurance for Healthcare Providers, accessed August 15, 2025, https://www.hpso.com/
25. Paramedic Professional Liability Insurance – CM&F Group, accessed August 15, 2025, https://www.cmfgroup.com/professional-liability-insurance/emergency-services-professional-insurance/paramedic-insurance/
26. Fact-Checked: Myths About Malpractice Insurance – AAPA, accessed August 15, 2025, https://www.aapa.org/news-central/2020/12/fact-checked-myths-about-malpractice-insurance/
27. Paramedic – CPH Insurance, accessed August 15, 2025, https://cphins.com/paramedic/
28. Individual vs. Employer-Provided Malpractice Insurance: Pros, Cons, and Coverage Gaps – Physicians Insurance Agency of Massachusetts, accessed August 15, 2025, https://piam.com/individual-vs-employer-mpl-2025/
29. Medical Liability Insurance shopping guide, accessed August 15, 2025, https://www.tdi.texas.gov/commercial/pcmedmal.html
30. FAQ: Professional Liability – Claims-Made vs. Occurrence | The Trust, accessed August 15, 2025, https://www.trustinsurance.com/About/FAQ/Liability-Programs/Professional-Liability/Claims-Made-vs-Occurrence
31. Claims-Made Vs. Occurrence Coverage – NSO, accessed August 15, 2025, https://www.nso.com/Learning/Artifacts/Articles/Claims-Made-Vs-Occurrence-Coverage
32. Claims Made vs. Occurrence – Oklahoma Academy of Physician Associates, accessed August 15, 2025, https://www.okpa.org/resources/malpractice-insurance/claims-made-vs-occurrence/
33. Claims-Made vs. Occurrence Malpractice Insurance | ACP – American College of Physicians, accessed August 15, 2025, https://www.acponline.org/about-acp/about-internal-medicine/career-paths/residency-career-counseling/resident-career-counseling-guidance-and-tips/malpractice-insurance
34. Everything You Need to Know About Malpractice Tail Coverage – Gallagher Healthcare, accessed August 15, 2025, https://www.gallaghermalpractice.com/blog/post/what-is-tail-coverage/
35. TMIC Medical Liability Insurance, accessed August 15, 2025, https://www.tmic.org/medical-liability-insurance
36. What Is Tail Coverage for Insurance? | The Hartford, accessed August 15, 2025, https://www.thehartford.com/business-insurance/tail-coverage
37. Professional liability / medical malpractice insurance for healthcare providers – Insureon, accessed August 15, 2025, https://www.insureon.com/healthcare-professionals-business-insurance/professional-liability
38. Medical Malpractice Insurance – Learn about Coverage – GEICO, accessed August 15, 2025, https://www.geico.com/medical-malpractice-insurance/
39. Need coverage? Getting a quote is as easy as 1-2-3 – HPSO, accessed August 15, 2025, https://www.hpso.com/Get-a-Quote
40. EMT Insurance and Paramedic Insurance – Get a Quote – xinsurance, accessed August 15, 2025, https://www.xinsurance.com/risk-class/emt-and-paramedic-insurance/
41. Paramedic Malpractice Insurance | InsuredBetter, accessed August 15, 2025, https://www.insuredbetter.com/professional-liability-insurance/paramedics/
42. Medical Professional Liability Insurance – ACEP, accessed August 15, 2025, https://www.acep.org/siteassets/uploads/uploaded-files/acep/clinical-and-practice-management/resources/medical-legal/mplipaperapril04.pdf
43. 44 Questions To Ask Before Purchasing Legal Malpractice Insurance, accessed August 15, 2025, https://blog.protexurelawyers.com/purchasing-legal-malpractice-insurance-questions-to-ask
44. Medical Malpractice: 5 Questions a Med Mal carrier should be asked as part of your due diligence – Risk Strategies, accessed August 15, 2025, https://www.risk-strategies.com/blog/medical-malpractice-5-questions-a-med-mal-carrier-should-be-asked-as-part-of-your-due-diligence
45. 6 Questions to ask about Medical Malpractice Insurance, accessed August 15, 2025, https://sma.org/6-questions-ask-medical-malpractice-insurance/
46. Questions to Ask Regarding Medical Malpractice Insurance – Kelsey-Seybold Clinic, accessed August 15, 2025, https://kelsey-seyboldproviders.com/questions-to-ask-regarding-medical-malpractice-insurance/