The Mississippi Flood Insurance Bible: A Definitive Guide to Navigating Risk, Rates, and Recovery

My name is David, and for the better part of two decades, I’ve worked in the Mississippi insurance and risk management world.

I started my career in the shadow of Hurricane Katrina, a catastrophe that didn’t just reshape our coastline but fundamentally rewired our relationship with risk, water, and the promises made on a piece of paper.

In those early years, I followed the playbook.

I advised my clients—friends, neighbors, people I saw at church—based on the standard wisdom.

I pulled up the FEMA flood maps, checked the zone, and sold the government-backed National Flood Insurance Program (NFIP) policy.

I thought I was helping them do everything right.

Then came the phone calls.

The first one that truly broke me was from a young family I had helped get into their dream home in a quiet coastal subdivision.

The house was valued at around $350,000.

I sold them the maximum NFIP dwelling coverage available: $250,000.

It was the “gold standard” of compliance.

When the next storm surge rolled through, their home was devastated.

They got their check from the NFIP, but they were still $100,000 short on the rebuild cost, with no coverage for the months they’d spend in a rental, and a mortgage to pay on a house that was now just a slab.

They did everything I told them to do, and they were still on the brink of financial ruin.

That failure was a turning point.

It forced me to see that the “standard advice” was a leaky raft in a hurricane.

The one-size-fits-all approach was failing Mississippians.

The system was broken, and with the rollout of the confusing new Risk Rating 2.0 pricing system, it was only getting more opaque.

My epiphany didn’t come from an insurance manual.

It came from a conversation with my sister, a physician, who was explaining the revolution in her field: the shift from generalized treatments to personalized medicine.

For decades, she explained, medicine treated diseases with a broad brush.

If you had a certain condition, you got the standard pill, regardless of your unique biology.

It worked for some, but failed many.

Today, medicine is moving toward a personalized model.

Doctors analyze a patient’s unique genetic markers, lifestyle, and specific biomarkers to create a tailored treatment plan.

They don’t just treat the disease; they treat the individual patient.

Suddenly, it all clicked.

We have been treating flood risk with the old, generalized model.

We looked at a broad “diagnosis”—the FEMA flood zone—and prescribed the same standard “pill”—the NFIP policy.

But every property, like every person, has its own unique D.A. Its specific elevation, its foundation type, its distance from the water, its replacement cost—these are its genetic markers.

To truly manage flood risk in Mississippi, we have to stop being simple policy vendors and start acting like diagnosticians, embracing a new paradigm of personalized risk management.

This guide is the result of that journey.

It is designed to be the definitive resource for any Mississippi property owner, real estate professional, or community leader trying to navigate these treacherous waters.

We will move beyond the outdated flood maps and confusing acronyms to build a personalized risk profile for your property.

We will diagnose your true exposure, compare all available treatment plans—from the federal program to the private market—and create a strategy of preventative care through mitigation that can protect your family and your finances.

This is not just about buying insurance; it’s about building resilience, one property at a time.

Part I: The Foundation – Understanding the Unseen Risk in Mississippi

Before we can build a personalized risk strategy, we must first clear away the dangerous misconceptions that leave so many Mississippi families exposed.

The world of flood insurance is built on a foundation of specific legal definitions and regulatory structures that are fundamentally different from any other type of insurance.

Understanding this foundation is the first and most critical step.

Why Your Homeowners Policy is a Leaky Raft: The Critical Divide

The single most common and financially devastating mistake a property owner in Mississippi can make is assuming their standard homeowners insurance policy will protect them from a flood.

It will not.

This isn’t a loophole or a fine-print “gotcha”; it is the foundational principle upon which the entire flood insurance market is built.¹

A standard homeowners policy is designed to cover many types of water damage, but it explicitly and purposefully excludes damage from a flood.

For example, if a pipe bursts inside your wall or your dishwasher overflows and ruins your kitchen floor, that is typically considered “water damage” and is often covered by your homeowners policy.²

A “flood,” however, is a legally distinct event.

Under the terms of the National Flood Insurance Program, a flood is defined as a “general and temporary condition of partial or complete inundation of two or more acres of normally dry land area or of two or more properties”.¹

This can be caused by the overflow of inland or tidal waters, rapid accumulation of surface waters from any source, or mudflow.

It is this specific event—water from the outside getting in on a wide-scale basis—that your homeowners policy is not designed to cover.

This distinction creates a dangerous gap in perception.

Homeowners become familiar with small, covered water damage events, which reinforces a general belief that their policy protects them from “water.” They fail to internalize the specific, legalistic exclusion for “flood,” which often seems like an abstract, low-probability risk.

The financial consequences of this misunderstanding are staggering.

Just a single inch of floodwater in a home can cause an estimated $25,000 in damage, a cost that would be borne entirely out-of-pocket without a separate flood insurance policy.³

This very dynamic was at the heart of the financial ruin and sense of betrayal felt by countless families after Hurricane Katrina, who discovered far too late that the “hurricane policy” they thought protected them was worthless against the rising waters of the storm surge.⁶

The Federal Backstop: An In-Depth Look at the National Flood Insurance Program (NFIP)

Because private insurance companies were historically unwilling to take on the colossal and correlated risk of widespread flooding, the U.S. Congress created the National Flood Insurance Program (NFIP) in 1968.

Administered by the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA), the NFIP has a dual mandate: to provide access to flood insurance and to encourage communities to adopt and enforce floodplain management regulations to mitigate flood effects.⁷

Today, the NFIP is the bedrock of flood insurance in Mississippi and across the nation, with policies available in over 22,600 participating communities.⁷

While you purchase an NFIP policy from a local insurance agent—the same one who might sell you home or auto insurance—the policy itself is ultimately backed by the full faith and credit of the U.S. government.²

A critical aspect of the program is its role in the real estate and mortgage market.

To ensure that properties in the highest-risk areas are protected, the NFIP includes a Mandatory Purchase Requirement.

This rule mandates that any home or business located in a designated high-risk flood area—known as a Special Flood Hazard Area (SFHA)—must have flood insurance if the owner has a mortgage from a federally regulated or insured lender.³

This is the primary enforcement mechanism that drives flood insurance adoption in vulnerable areas.

However, the NFIP is not merely an insurance program; it is one of the most powerful federal tools for influencing local land use and building codes.

For a Mississippi town or county to make NFIP insurance available to its residents, it must agree to join the program.

Participation requires the local government to formally adopt and, crucially, enforce a flood damage prevention ordinance that meets minimum federal standards.¹⁰

These ordinances typically require permits for all development in the floodplain, mandate that new residential structures be elevated to or above the Base Flood Elevation (BFE), and require FEMA Elevation Certificates to document compliance.¹⁰

In this way, FEMA effectively sets minimum building and zoning standards for development in flood-prone areas across Mississippi, using the availability of insurance as a powerful lever to compel safer community planning.

For homeowners, one of the most important practical details to understand is the waiting period.

Typically, there is a 30-day waiting period from the date of purchase before an NFIP policy goes into effect.

This rule is designed to prevent people from buying coverage only when a storm is imminent.

There are exceptions, such as when the insurance is purchased in connection with a new loan, but the 30-day delay means that proactive planning is essential.³

The Mississippi Framework: How State Agencies Shape the Rules

While the NFIP sets the federal foundation, Mississippi has its own layer of state-level agencies and laws that regulate the insurance landscape, protect consumers, and manage disaster recovery.

Understanding these key state players is essential for any Mississippi property owner.

The Mississippi Insurance Department (MID): The MID is the state’s primary consumer protection agency for all things insurance.

Its role is multifaceted.

It is responsible for reviewing and approving the policy forms and rate filings for the private flood insurance market that operates in the state.⁴

If you have a dispute with an insurance company or agent over a claim, billing, or sales practice, the MID’s Consumer Service Division is your first official avenue for assistance, offering a formal complaint process to mediate disputes.¹¹

Furthermore, the MID administers critical state-run initiatives like the Strengthen Mississippi Homes grant program, which provides funds for wind mitigation.¹³

The Mississippi Emergency Management Agency (MEMA): MEMA is the state’s command center for disaster preparedness, response, and recovery.

It works hand-in-hand with FEMA after a disaster to administer federal assistance programs.¹⁵

Crucially for homeowners looking to reduce their risk, MEMA’s Hazard Mitigation Office manages a suite of grant programs, such as the Flood Mitigation Assistance (FMA) program and the Hazard Mitigation Grant Program (HMGP), which can provide federal funds to help pay for projects like home elevations or acquisitions of flood-prone properties.¹⁶

State Law and Political Advocacy: The Mississippi Legislature has passed specific laws that shape the insurance market.

Mississippi Code § 29-13-1, for example, governs the purchase of flood insurance for all state-owned buildings.¹⁸

More significantly, the state passed legislation like House Bill 1329 to create a clear regulatory framework for a private flood insurance market to thrive alongside the NFIP, setting rules for insurers on everything from policy definitions to rate filings.⁴

This state-level involvement creates a fascinating dynamic where Mississippi’s government plays a dual role.

On one hand, the MID acts as a regulator, working to ensure a stable and solvent private insurance market, which includes allowing insurers to charge rates that provide a “reasonable rate of return”.⁴

On the other hand, the state’s elected officials act as fierce advocates for their citizens

against federal policies they see as harmful.

For instance, Mississippi’s U.S. Senators have been at the forefront of demanding that FEMA scrap its new Risk Rating 2.0 system, arguing that its “actuarially sound” rates are causing “premiums to skyrocket” and are economically devastating for Mississippians.¹⁹

This reveals a core tension: the state desires the risk-transfer benefits of a robust insurance market but actively fights the painful economic consequences when actuarial reality collides with political and social reality.

Part II: The Two Paths – A Comparative Analysis of NFIP and Private Flood Insurance

In our new paradigm of personalized risk management, once we have a diagnosis of a property’s unique risk, we must choose a treatment plan.

For Mississippi property owners, there are two primary “prescriptions” available: the traditional federal NFIP policy and a policy from the growing private market.

Each has distinct benefits and drawbacks, and the right choice depends entirely on the specific needs, value, and risk profile of your property.

The NFIP Path: Coverage, Limitations, and the Fine Print

The National Flood Insurance Program policy is the standard, government-backed option.

It is a reliable, if limited, choice available to nearly everyone in a participating community.

An NFIP policy is divided into two main coverage types, which must be purchased separately: Building Coverage and Contents Coverage.¹

• Building Coverage protects the insured building’s structure, including its foundation, walls, electrical and plumbing systems, furnace, and other items permanently attached to the structure.⁸
• Contents Coverage protects your personal belongings, such as furniture, clothing, and electronics. This is not automatically included and must be added to the policy.¹

The NFIP offers several different policy forms tailored to specific property types ⁹:

• The Dwelling Form: The most common form, used for single-family or 2-4 family residential buildings.
• The General Property Form: Used for non-residential buildings (like businesses or detached garages) and other residential buildings with five or more units (like apartment buildings).
• The Residential Condominium Building Association Policy (RCBAP): A master policy that insures an entire condominium building, including all units.

The most significant limitation of the NFIP—and the primary driver behind the growth of the private market—is its rigid, and often inadequate, coverage limits.

For residential properties, NFIP Building Coverage is capped at a maximum of $250,000, and Contents Coverage is capped at $100,000.⁵

For commercial properties, the building limit is $500,000.⁵

These caps, established decades ago, have failed to keep pace with inflation and modern construction costs.

This creates a dangerous “coverage gap” for many average, middle-class Mississippi homeowners, not just the wealthy.

A modest home that is completely destroyed by a flood could easily have a replacement cost of $350,000 or more, especially when factoring in the need to rebuild to stricter modern codes.

In this common scenario, a homeowner who is “fully insured” with the maximum NFIP policy would receive their $250,000 check and still face a crippling $100,000 uninsured loss.

Furthermore, standard NFIP policies have notable exclusions.

They generally do not cover Additional Living Expenses (ALE)—the cost of staying in a hotel or rental if a flood makes your home uninhabitable.

They also exclude damage to property outside the main structure, such as swimming pools, fences, decks, and landscaping.

This means that even a homeowner with maximum NFIP coverage can face tens of thousands of dollars in uncovered expenses, a harsh reality that can turn a natural disaster into a long-term financial catastrophe.

The Private Market Path: Higher Limits and Greater Flexibility

In response to the clear limitations of the NFIP, a robust private flood insurance market has emerged, fully sanctioned and regulated by Mississippi state law.⁴

These policies are offered by private insurance companies and provide a flexible, often more comprehensive, alternative to the federal program.

The primary advantages of private flood insurance are higher limits and broader coverage ⁵:

• Higher Coverage Limits: Private insurers are not bound by the NFIP’s caps. They can offer dwelling coverage well in excess of $250,000, with some policies going up to $2 million or more. Contents coverage can also be much higher, often reaching $500,000 or more.⁵ This is essential for any homeowner whose property has a replacement cost that exceeds the NFIP limits.
• Broader Coverage Options: Private policies often include critical coverages that are excluded from a standard NFIP policy. This can include Additional Living Expenses (ALE) to cover temporary housing costs and Replacement Cost Value (RCV) on contents, which pays to replace your belongings with new items, rather than the NFIP’s typical Actual Cash Value (ACV), which only pays for the depreciated value of your used items.⁴
• Competitive Pricing and Innovation: For properties that private insurers deem to be lower risk, they can often offer more competitive premiums than the NFIP. The private market also fosters innovation, with some companies offering features like “Rate-Lock”, which allows a policyholder to lock in their premium for two or three years, providing stability and peace of mind against volatile rate hikes.²⁰

However, the private market path also comes with potential drawbacks:

• Stricter Underwriting: Unlike the NFIP, which must offer coverage to anyone in a participating community, private insurers can be selective. They use their own sophisticated risk models and can choose to deny coverage or non-renew a policy for properties they deem too risky.⁵
• Rate Volatility: While some offer rate locks, private market rates can fluctuate based on the insurer’s appetite for risk and the changing costs in the global reinsurance market, which provides the backup capital for private insurers.⁵

The growth of this private market is creating a two-tiered system.

Private insurers are increasingly “cherry-picking” the most desirable, lower-risk properties by offering them better rates and coverage.

This leaves the NFIP holding a portfolio that is more and more concentrated with older, higher-risk, and less profitable properties.

This phenomenon, known as adverse selection, threatens the long-term financial stability of the NFIP, potentially forcing it to raise rates even further on the most vulnerable Mississippians who have no other insurance option.

Head-to-Head: Making the Right Choice for Your Mississippi Property

Choosing between the NFIP and a private policy is a critical decision in your personalized risk management plan.

There is no single “best” answer; the right choice depends on a careful evaluation of your property’s value, your risk tolerance, and your financial situation.

The following table provides a clear, side-by-side comparison to guide your decision.

Table 1: NFIP vs. Private Flood Insurance — A Comparative Overview

Feature	National Flood Insurance Program (NFIP)	Private Flood Insurance
Dwelling Coverage Limit	Max $250,000 (Residential) 5	Often $1,000,000+; can exceed $2M 5
Contents Coverage Limit	Max $100,000 (Residential) 5	Often $500,000+ 5
Additional Living Expenses (ALE)	Not typically covered.	Often included as a standard or optional coverage.4
Contents Valuation	Typically Actual Cash Value (depreciated).	Often offers Replacement Cost Value (new for old).5
Waiting Period	Typically 30 days.3	Varies by company; can be shorter (10-14 days) or waived for loan closings.5
Underwriting / Acceptance	Guaranteed acceptance in participating communities.5	Selective; can deny or non-renew high-risk properties.5
Backing / Solvency	Backed by the U.S. Government.5	Backed by the private insurance company and its reinsurers.
Lender Acceptance	Universally accepted by mortgage lenders.	Generally accepted, but homeowner must verify the policy meets lender requirements.

Key Decision Factors:

• If your home’s rebuild cost exceeds $250,000: The private market is likely your only path to being fully insured.
• If you need Additional Living Expenses coverage: A private policy is almost certainly the superior choice.
• If your property is in a very high-risk area and has been repeatedly flooded: The NFIP may be your only option, as private insurers may decline to offer coverage.
• Always compare quotes: For any property, it is prudent to get quotes from both the NFIP and several private market carriers to compare cost and coverage.

Part III: The Ghost of Katrina – How the “Wind vs. Water” Battle Forged a Legacy of Mistrust

To understand the flood insurance landscape in Mississippi today, one must understand the deep scar left by Hurricane Katrina in 2005.

The storm was more than a meteorological event; it was a cataclysm that triggered a crisis of faith between policyholders and the insurance industry.

The legal and emotional fallout from Katrina, particularly the infamous “wind versus water” dispute, fundamentally altered the public’s perception of insurance and created a legacy of skepticism that influences every insurance interaction in the state to this day.

A Storm of Litigation: Deconstructing the “Wind vs. Water” Dispute

In the aftermath of Katrina, as homeowners returned to find their properties obliterated, a complex and contentious question arose: what, exactly, destroyed their homes? The answer was worth billions of dollars.

A standard homeowners policy covers damage from wind but explicitly excludes damage from flooding (i.e., rising water, including storm surge).

A separate flood policy, most often from the NFIP, covers flood damage but not wind damage.⁶

When a hurricane delivers both 140-mph winds and a 20-foot storm surge, this distinction becomes a chaotic and ambiguous battleground.

The core of the post-Katrina litigation centered on allegations that insurance companies, in an effort to protect their own financial interests, systematically and deliberately misclassified damage caused by wind as damage caused by flooding.

This strategy would shift the enormous financial liability from their own corporate books to the federally backed NFIP.⁶

This conflict was most acute in the thousands of cases where only a concrete foundation slab remained.

With the structure completely gone, it became nearly impossible to forensically prove what failed first.

Did the wind blow the house apart, with the subsequent surge washing away the debris? If so, the homeowners policy should have paid.

Or did the storm surge rise and knock the house off its foundation, with the wind playing a secondary role? In that case, only a flood policy would respond.

In this vacuum of evidence, insurers often defaulted to the flood exclusion, denying the homeowners claim and placing the burden of proof on the devastated policyholder to prove otherwise—an often impossible task.⁶

This pattern of denials led to widespread public outrage and a wave of litigation, including high-profile lawsuits filed by Mississippi’s then-Attorney General Jim Hood against the nation’s largest insurers.⁶

The legal battle reached the U.S. Supreme Court in cases like

State Farm v.

Rigsby, which involved claims adjusters who blew the whistle, alleging they were instructed by State Farm to misclassify wind damage as flood damage specifically to shift the cost to the federal government.²²

The financial stakes were immense: Katrina was a $41.1 billion insured event, and the NFIP alone paid out $2.4 billion on nearly 19,000 claims in Mississippi.⁶

The Lingering Impact: How Katrina’s Legacy Affects Policyholders Today

The legal battles of Katrina were not just historical footnotes; they created a permanent atmosphere of distrust and led to tangible changes in the Mississippi insurance landscape.

The experience taught a painful lesson to a generation of Mississippians: as one contemporary report noted, “being a loyal policyholder who has paid premiums on time for years doesn’t mean you can count on your insurer to treat you fairly after you’ve been devastated by a natural disaster”.⁶

The comforting slogans of the industry, like State Farm’s “Like a good neighbor…” or Allstate’s “You’re in Good Hands,” became sources of bitter irony for those who felt abandoned.⁶

This profound breach of trust has had several lasting effects:

• Improved Policy Language: In the wake of the extensive litigation, many insurers re-evaluated and clarified their policy wordings to draw a sharper, less ambiguous line between covered wind damage and excluded flood damage, aiming to prevent a repeat of the post-Katrina legal quagmire.²³
• Heightened Consumer Scrutiny: Mississippi policyholders are now more educated, more skeptical, and more likely to question a claim denial or delay. The collective trauma of Katrina created a more adversarial consumer environment where the insurer’s word is no longer taken at face value.
• Rise of Bad Faith Awareness: The post-Katrina experience shone a spotlight on the legal concept of “bad faith,” where an insurer acts unreasonably in handling a claim. Mississippi has a “Policyholder Bill of Rights” and specific statutes that define bad faith actions, such as failing to conduct a prompt and reasonable investigation, attempting to settle claims for an unreasonably low amount, or failing to affirm or deny coverage within a reasonable time.²⁴ Homeowners and their attorneys are now far more aware of these rights and more willing to pursue bad faith claims.

This history has created a unique dynamic in the state.

The memory of the massive jury verdicts and public relations disaster that insurers faced after Katrina now serves as a silent deterrent against the most egregious behavior.

When a dispute arises today, both the policyholder’s attorney and the insurance company’s legal team are operating with the knowledge of the “Katrina precedent.” An attorney representing a homeowner in a storm damage dispute can leverage the implicit threat of a messy, public “wind vs. water” bad faith lawsuit, which gives them more negotiating power than they might have in a state without such a painful and well-documented history.

The ghost of Katrina is, in effect, a third party at every negotiating table.

Part IV: The Great Recalibration – A Deep Dive into Risk Rating 2.0

In October 2021, the NFIP underwent its most significant transformation in 50 years with the implementation of Risk Rating 2.0.

This new pricing methodology was designed to correct long-standing inequities and to set premiums that more accurately reflect a property’s true flood risk.

However, this “great recalibration” has also unleashed a political firestorm and created an affordability crisis for tens of thousands of Mississippi policyholders, making it one of the most controversial and misunderstood issues in insurance today.

Deconstructing the Algorithm: How Risk Rating 2.0 Actually Works

To understand the controversy, one must first understand the fundamental shift in methodology.

Risk Rating 2.0 represents a move away from a generalized, geography-based model of risk to a hyper-specific, property-level one.

The Old System: For decades, NFIP premiums were based primarily on a property’s location within a Flood Insurance Rate Map (FIRM).

The key factors were the flood zone (e.g., Zone A for high-risk, Zone V for high-risk coastal, Zone X for moderate-to-low risk), the building’s occupancy type, and its elevation relative to the Base Flood Elevation (BFE).²⁵

This system was blunt; it did not account for many specific property characteristics and, most notably, it did not factor in the cost to rebuild a structure.

This led to inequities where lower-value homes were often subsidizing higher-value homes in the same flood zone.²⁶

The New System (Risk Rating 2.0): The new methodology abandons the old flood zones for rating purposes.

Instead, it creates a unique “risk fingerprint” for each individual property by analyzing a wide range of variables using modern data sources and catastrophe models.²⁵

Key rating variables now include:

• Proximity to Flooding Sources: A property’s specific distance to the coast, a river, or other flooding source.²⁷
• Flood Frequency and Type: The system considers multiple types of flood risk, including river overflow, storm surge, coastal erosion, and heavy rainfall (pluvial flooding).²⁵
• Ground Elevation: The specific elevation of the land where the building sits.²⁷
• Building Characteristics: The model analyzes the foundation type (e.g., slab, crawlspace, pilings), first-floor height, number of floors, and construction type.²⁷
• Replacement Cost Value: Crucially, the cost to rebuild the home is now a primary rating factor. Higher-value homes, which represent a greater potential loss, now pay a proportionally higher premium.²⁵

It is critical to note that while flood zones are no longer used to calculate the premium, they are still used by lenders to enforce the mandatory purchase requirement and by communities for floodplain management and building code purposes.²⁵

This shift has created a significant transparency paradox.

FEMA’s stated goal is to “clearly communicate flood risk” to policyholders.²⁹

And in one sense, by listing the factors that influence a rate, they have.

However, the actual actuarial models, the weighting of each variable, and the specific data sources used to generate a premium are proprietary and not made public.¹⁹

This means that while an agent can tell a homeowner their rate is high due to their “risk profile,” they often cannot show the precise calculation or say, “If you elevate your home by two feet, your premium will drop by exactly this amount.” This lack of a clear, verifiable cause-and-effect at the consumer level has led to widespread frustration and accusations that the system is an unaccountable “black box,” directly undermining the stated goal of clear communication.²⁶

The Bottom Line for Mississippi: Analyzing the Data

The theoretical changes of Risk Rating 2.0 have translated into very real and often painful financial consequences for Mississippi property owners.

While FEMA data shows that some policyholders have seen decreases, the overwhelming trend in the state has been toward significant premium hikes, leading to a documented affordability crisis.

The data paints a stark picture of the impact on the state:

• An estimated 84% of Mississippi’s NFIP policyholders experienced a monthly premium increase in 2025 as a result of the new system.¹⁹
• Once all policies reach their full risk-based rate, the average annual premium for Mississippi homeowners is projected to increase by approximately 103%.¹⁹
• The consequences of these hikes are not theoretical. In a single recent 12-month period, approximately 2,200 Mississippians dropped their NFIP policies, presumably due to the rising costs, leaving them and their communities more vulnerable.¹⁹

FEMA’s own state-level analysis, while presented more optimistically, confirms the general trend.

The following table synthesizes data from multiple sources to provide a clear, evidence-based view of Risk Rating 2.0’s effect on Mississippi.

Table 2: The Impact of Risk Rating 2.0 in Mississippi

Metric	Value	Source(s)
% of MS Policyholders with Premium Increase (2025 est.)	84%	19
Projected Average % Increase at Full-Risk Rate	~103%	19
Number of Policies Dropped (12-Month Period)	~2,200	19
FEMA Data on Policy Changes:
Policies with Immediate Decrease	10,047	30
Policies with $0 – $20/mo Increase	48,555	30
Policies with >$20/mo Increase	2,716	30

The Political Firestorm: Mississippi’s Pushback

The economic pain detailed above has ignited a significant political backlash from Mississippi’s leaders, who find themselves caught between federal mandates and the financial well-being of their constituents.

Mississippi’s U.S. Senators have been vocal in their opposition, joining bipartisan efforts to demand that FEMA terminate Risk Rating 2.0 entirely.¹⁹

Their arguments center on two main points: the devastating impact on affordability and a lack of transparency from FEMA. They contend that the agency has not allowed for meaningful public input and refuses to publish the underlying data and actuarial models used to justify the steep premium increases.¹⁹

The core fear is that as rates continue to climb toward their full-risk level, thousands more families will be forced to abandon their insurance coverage, leading to widespread economic strain and risking the collapse of entire coastal communities after the next major disaster.¹⁹

This conflict represents a classic battle between two irreconcilable truths.

The actuarial truth is that for the NFIP to become financially solvent after decades of debt—much of it incurred from catastrophic events like Hurricane Katrina—premiums must reflect the true, high cost of building and living in flood-prone areas like the Mississippi Gulf Coast.²⁶

The

political truth, however, is that the economies of these same coastal communities are built on property values that are sustained, in part, by historically subsidized, artificially low flood insurance rates.

When a homeowner’s premium jumps from $800 a year to a projected $4,000, it doesn’t just strain their budget; it can make the home unaffordable and unattractive to potential buyers, depressing its market value.²⁶

When this effect is multiplied across thousands of properties, it threatens the local real estate market and the property tax base that funds schools, fire departments, and infrastructure.

Therefore, the political pushback from Mississippi’s leaders is not simply a dispute over an insurance formula; it is an act of economic self-preservation for communities whose financial viability depends on preventing the true cost of their flood risk from being fully realized.

Part V: The Homeowner’s Playbook – Reducing Risk and Lowering Premiums

While the forces shaping flood insurance rates can feel overwhelming, property owners in Mississippi are not powerless.

In our personalized risk management framework, this is the “preventative care” phase.

By taking proactive steps to mitigate risk, homeowners can not only make their property safer but also directly lower their insurance premiums.

This section provides a practical playbook of every available strategy, from individual home fortifications to community-wide initiatives and state-sponsored grants.

Individual Fortification: High-Impact Mitigation Actions

The most direct way to lower your flood risk and insurance premium is to make physical changes to your property.

Under Risk Rating 2.0’s property-specific model, these mitigation efforts can translate directly into dollar-for-dollar savings.

Key mitigation actions include ³¹:

• Elevating the Structure: Physically raising the entire home on piers, posts, or an elevated foundation is the most effective, albeit most expensive, mitigation technique.
• Elevating Utilities: A more affordable but still highly effective action is to elevate critical machinery and equipment—such as HVAC units, water heaters, and electrical panels—above the potential flood level, often to a higher floor or an elevated platform.
• Installing Flood Openings (Vents): For homes with crawlspaces or enclosures below the main living area, installing specially designed flood vents allows floodwaters to flow through the foundation rather than building up pressure and causing a structural collapse. This is a relatively low-cost, high-impact retrofit.
• Floodproofing (Non-Residential): For commercial buildings, this can involve sealing walls to make them watertight and using other techniques to prevent floodwaters from entering.

For homeowners facing a major rebuild after a flood, the NFIP offers a crucial source of funding to help with these efforts.

Increased Cost of Compliance (ICC) coverage is included in all standard NFIP policies.

If your home is declared “substantially damaged” (meaning the cost of repairs is 50% or more of its pre-damage market value), you may be eligible for up to an additional $30,000 through ICC to help pay for the costs of elevating, moving, or demolishing the structure to bring it into compliance with current floodplain management ordinances.³¹

Another powerful tool for managing cost is the policy deductible.

By choosing a higher deductible, you agree to take on more of the initial financial risk in the event of a claim, which in turn lowers your annual premium.

Increasing your deductible to the maximum of $10,000 could reduce your yearly premium by as much as 40%, but this requires ensuring you have sufficient savings to cover that out-of-pocket cost if a flood occurs.³³

Table 3: High-ROI Mitigation Actions for Mississippi Homeowners

Mitigation Action	Description	Potential Premium Impact	Relative Cost	Relevant Grant/Funding
Obtain Elevation Certificate	Hire a licensed surveyor to document your home’s precise elevation data.	High	Low	N/A
Install Flood Vents	Add engineered openings to your foundation to allow water to pass through.	High (for crawlspace homes)	Low to Medium	MEMA/FEMA Grants
Elevate Utilities/HVAC	Raise electrical panels, water heaters, and HVAC units above the BFE.	Medium	Medium	MEMA/FEMA Grants
Choose Higher Deductible	Increase the out-of-pocket amount you pay on a claim (e.g., to $10,000).	High	N/A (Financial Risk)	N/A
Elevate Entire Structure	Physically raise the entire home on a new, higher foundation.	Very High	Very High	ICC, MEMA/FEMA Grants

The Power of Community: The Community Rating System (CRS)

One of the most powerful but least understood ways to lower flood insurance premiums is through collective, community-wide action.

FEMA’s Community Rating System (CRS) is a voluntary incentive program that rewards municipalities for adopting and enforcing floodplain management practices that go above and beyond the minimum NFIP requirements.³⁶

When a community participates in the CRS, it earns points for a wide range of activities, such as preserving open space in floodplains, enforcing stricter building codes, maintaining drainage systems, and conducting public outreach about flood risk.³⁶

Based on the total points earned, the community is assigned a CRS Class, from Class 9 (the entry level) to Class 1 (the best).

For every class improvement, all NFIP policyholders within that community receive an additional 5% discount on their premiums, up to a maximum of 45% for a Class 1 community.³⁶

These discounts are significant and apply to every NFIP policy in town, whether inside a high-risk flood zone or not.

In Mississippi, policyholders in the 31 participating communities save an average of $162, or 15%, on their annual premiums.³¹

The City of Hattiesburg, for example, recently improved its rating from a Class 8 to a Class 7, securing a 15% discount for its residents starting in 2026.³⁸

The CRS framework provides a concrete roadmap for citizens to lobby their local government for change that has a direct and predictable financial benefit.

Instead of simply complaining about high rates, residents can organize and demand that their city council take specific, point-earning actions—like adopting a new open space preservation plan or improving storm drain maintenance—that will result in a guaranteed, community-wide insurance discount.

The CRS thus becomes a powerful lever for grassroots political action and a collaborative way to build a more resilient community.

State Support: The Strengthen Mississippi Homes Program

Mississippi offers its own unique grant program to help homeowners fortify their properties, primarily against wind damage, but with a crucial link to flood resilience.

The Strengthen Mississippi Homes (SMH) program, administered by the Mississippi Insurance Department, provides grants of up to $10,000 for eligible homeowners to retrofit their roofs to the rigorous FORTIFIED™ standard developed by the Insurance Institute for Business & Home Safety (IBHS).¹³

Achieving a FORTIFIED™ designation can lead to substantial discounts—ranging from 15% to over 50%—on the wind portion of a standard homeowners insurance policy.³⁹

The program is a direct financial incentive to harden the state’s housing stock against hurricane and tornado damage.

However, the SMH program contains a brilliant piece of policy engineering related to flood insurance.

A key eligibility requirement for this wind mitigation grant is that the homeowner must have an active flood insurance policy if their property is located in a Special Flood Hazard Area.¹³

This requirement effectively creates a “Trojan Horse” for flood policy adoption.

By tying a highly desirable $10,000 grant and permanent wind insurance savings to a mandatory flood insurance requirement, the state uses the powerful incentive of lower homeowners insurance premiums to combat the problem of residents dropping their flood insurance coverage due to rising costs.

A homeowner in a coastal flood zone who wants the grant for a new roof is compelled to keep or purchase a flood policy to qualify.

In this way, the state achieves two critical resilience goals at once: it hardens homes against wind and it helps maintain the number of flood policies in force in the state’s most vulnerable areas.

The Elevation Certificate: Your Key to a Fairer Premium

In the new world of Risk Rating 2.0, the single most important document a homeowner can possess is an Elevation Certificate (EC).

An EC is a formal report prepared by a licensed land surveyor, professional engineer, or certified architect.

It documents a building’s specific elevation data, most importantly its Lowest Floor Elevation compared to the area’s Base Flood Elevation (BFE).⁴¹

While an EC is not always required to purchase a policy under RR2.0, providing one to your insurance agent is highly recommended.

It is the best way to ensure FEMA’s rating algorithm is working with the most accurate data for your specific property, which can lead to a lower premium.³³

Think of the EC as your official, verified “receipt” for the RR2.0 algorithm.

Without it, FEMA may rely on large-scale topographical data or other estimation methods to determine your home’s elevation, which can have a significant margin of error.

If FEMA’s estimate is lower than your home’s actual elevation, you could be paying a higher premium than you should.

The EC allows you to “fact-check” FEMA’s data with precise, on-the-ground measurements.

It gives you a measure of control over the process by ensuring you get credit for every inch of elevation and every mitigation feature your home possesses.

To obtain an EC, you should first contact your local community’s floodplain manager (often in the planning or building permit department) to see if one is already on file for your property, perhaps from when it was built.⁴⁴

If one does not exist, you will need to hire a licensed surveyor or engineer to complete one for a fee.⁴²

The cost of the certificate can often be recouped quickly through lower annual insurance premiums.

Part VI: When the Waters Rise – Navigating Claims and Disputes

Even with the best preparation, floods happen.

When they do, navigating the insurance claims process during a time of immense stress can be daunting.

Understanding the correct procedures, anticipating common problems, and knowing your rights are essential to securing a fair and timely settlement.

After the Flood: A Step-by-Step Guide to Filing Your Claim

In the chaotic period immediately following a flood, following a clear, systematic process is crucial.

The actions you take in the first 48 hours can dramatically impact the outcome of your claim.

1. Contact Your Insurer Immediately: As soon as it is safe to do so, call your insurance agent or the carrier’s national claims hotline to report the loss. Do not wait for power to be restored or for the water to fully recede. The sooner you get your claim in the queue, the sooner an adjuster can be assigned.⁵
2. Document Everything (The Imperative): Before you move, clean, or throw away anything, meticulously document the damage. Use your smartphone to take hundreds of photos and a detailed video walkthrough of every affected room. Capture wide shots showing the scope of the damage and close-ups of specific items. Crucially, document the high-water marks on both interior and exterior walls. This visual evidence is your most powerful tool.⁵ In a flood claim, the initial burden of proof rests on you, the policyholder. The adjuster’s job is to validate your claim, not build it for you. Your documentation creates an undeniable record of your loss.
3. Meet the Adjuster: An insurance adjuster will contact you to schedule an inspection. Be present for this inspection, walk them through the property, and provide them with a copy of your photo and video documentation.
4. File a Proof of Loss: This is the most critical piece of paperwork in your claim. The Proof of Loss is your formal, sworn statement detailing the scope and amount of your claimed damages. For NFIP policies, you are typically required to submit this form within 60 days of the flood.⁵ Work closely with your adjuster to complete this, but remember that you are ultimately responsible for its accuracy.
5. Seek Advance Payments: If you are displaced and facing immediate expenses, ask your adjuster about the possibility of an advance payment on your claim to help with urgent needs while the full claim is being processed.⁴⁸

Common Points of Failure: Anticipating Disputes

Unfortunately, not all claims proceed smoothly.

Being aware of the most common points of friction can help you prepare and defend your claim more effectively.

• Valuation Disputes: This is the most frequent source of conflict. You and the insurer may disagree on the cost of repairs or the value of your destroyed property. This is especially true for contents claims under an Actual Cash Value (ACV) policy, where disputes over the correct depreciation amount are common.⁴⁸
• Scope of Damage Disagreements: The insurer may dispute whether certain damages were directly caused by the flood. This is often an issue with hidden damage, like mold that develops behind walls or subtle foundation damage that appears weeks after the event.⁴⁸
• Unreasonable Delays: Under Mississippi law, insurers must conduct a prompt investigation and settlement of claims. Unreasonable delays can be a violation of your rights.²⁴
• Lowball Settlement Offers: An insurer may offer a settlement that is significantly less than what a reasonable person would believe they are entitled to. This is why obtaining your own detailed estimates from local, reputable contractors is essential to counter the insurer’s offer.

It is important to recognize that in a widespread disaster, many of these issues are caused by systemic failures, not necessarily overt malice.

Insurers often bring in hundreds of independent adjusters from out of state who may be unfamiliar with local building costs and overwhelmed with massive caseloads.

This can lead to honest errors, missed damage, and underpayments.

Understanding this dynamic helps you realize the importance of proactively managing the process and providing your own thorough documentation and estimates.

Your Avenues for Appeal: From the MID to the Courthouse

If you find yourself at an impasse with your insurance company over a denied or underpaid claim, you are not without recourse.

Mississippi provides a clear escalation path for consumers.

1. File a Complaint with the Mississippi Insurance Department (MID): Your first and most effective step is often to file a formal complaint with the MID’s Consumer Service Division. This can be done online or by calling their toll-free helpline.¹¹ Filing a complaint is a strategic move that creates an official, documented record of your dispute outside the insurance company. The MID will formally forward your complaint to the insurer’s compliance department for a written response, elevating its visibility and often prompting a senior-level review that can lead to a resolution without litigation.²⁴
2. Seek Legal Counsel: If the dispute cannot be resolved through the MID, or if the issue involves complex legal questions or potential bad faith, your final option is to hire an attorney who specializes in insurance law. An experienced attorney can negotiate with the insurer on your behalf and, if necessary, file a lawsuit for breach of contract or insurance bad faith.⁴⁸ As established by the Policyholder Bill of Rights, you have the right to be treated fairly and honestly, and the legal system provides a venue to enforce that right.²⁴

Conclusion: From Passive Policyholder to Active Risk Manager

The landscape of flood insurance in Mississippi is more complex and challenging than ever before.

The legacy of Katrina has left a permanent mark of skepticism, while the economic shocks of Risk Rating 2.0 are forcing a painful but necessary reckoning with the true cost of living with water.

It is easy to feel powerless in the face of skyrocketing premiums and opaque federal programs.

However, the central lesson of our journey is that you are not powerless.

The old paradigm of passively accepting a one-size-fits-all policy is obsolete.

The new paradigm of personalized risk management empowers you to become the active manager of your own financial safety.

By diagnosing your property’s unique “flood DNA” through tools like the Elevation Certificate; by carefully prescribing the right “treatment plan” from the full menu of NFIP and private insurance options; and by committing to a regimen of “preventative care” through individual and community mitigation, you can seize control.

You can build a strategy that not only satisfies a lender’s requirement but that genuinely protects your family’s largest investment.

The waters will continue to rise, and the storms will continue to come.

But by embracing this new way of thinking, we can move from a position of vulnerability to one of resilience, ensuring that Mississippi’s communities can weather not just the next flood, but the challenges of the next generation.

Appendix: Essential Resources

A. Directory of Key Mississippi Agencies and Contacts

• Mississippi Insurance Department (MID) Consumer Help Line:

• Phone: 800-562-2957 or 601-359-2453 ¹¹
• Purpose: For filing complaints against insurers/agents and for general insurance questions.
• Strengthen Mississippi Homes (SMH) Program:

• Phone: 800-562-2957 ¹³
• Email: smh@mid.ms.gov ¹³
• Purpose: To apply for and get information on wind mitigation grants.
• Mississippi Emergency Management Agency (MEMA) Mitigation Office:

• Phone: 601-933-6636 (Director Jana Henderson) ¹⁶
• Email: mitigationgrants@mema.ms.gov (for grant notices of intent) ¹⁶
• Purpose: Information on federal hazard mitigation grant programs (HMGP, FMA).
• FEMA / National Flood Insurance Program (NFIP):

• General NFIP Help: 877-336-2627 ⁷
• FEMA Mapping and Insurance eXchange (FMIX): 877-336-2627 or FEMA-FMIX@fema.dhs.gov ⁵¹
• Website: FloodSmart.gov ¹

B. Glossary of Critical Flood Insurance Terminology

• Actual Cash Value (ACV): The value of a damaged item at the time of loss, calculated as the replacement cost minus depreciation. This is the standard valuation for contents under an NFIP policy.
• Base Flood Elevation (BFE): The elevation to which floodwater is anticipated to rise during a “base flood” (a flood having a one percent chance of being equaled or exceeded in any given year).⁵²
• Community Rating System (CRS): A voluntary FEMA program that provides flood insurance premium discounts to communities that exceed minimum floodplain management requirements.³⁶
• Elevation Certificate (EC): A document prepared by a licensed surveyor, engineer, or architect that certifies a building’s elevation data, used for rating and compliance.⁴¹
• Flood Insurance Rate Map (FIRM): The official map of a community on which FEMA has delineated both the Special Flood Hazard Areas and the risk premium zones applicable to the community.¹⁰
• Increased Cost of Compliance (ICC): An NFIP coverage (up to $30,000) that helps pay for the cost of bringing a flood-damaged home into compliance with local floodplain ordinances.³⁵
• Proof of Loss: A policyholder’s formal, signed, and sworn statement of the amount being claimed, required by the insurer before any payment is made. For NFIP claims, this is typically due within 60 days of the flood.⁵
• Replacement Cost Value (RCV): The cost to replace a damaged item with a new one of similar kind and quality, without deducting for depreciation.
• Special Flood Hazard Area (SFHA): An area identified on a FIRM as having a 1% or greater chance of flooding in any given year. Flood insurance is mandatory in SFHAs for properties with federally backed mortgages.⁷

Works cited

1. The National Flood Insurance Program: Floodsmart, accessed August 13, 2025, https://www.floodsmart.gov/
2. Flood Insurance | OakTrust Insurance | Ocean Springs | Gulfport | Biloxi | Gautier, accessed August 13, 2025, https://oaktrustinsurance.com/flood-insurance-mississippi/
3. 6 Questions to Ask Your Agent About Flood Insurance – NAIC, accessed August 13, 2025, https://content.naic.org/article/consumer-insight-6-questions-ask-your-agent-about-flood-insurance
4. HB1329 (As Introduced) – 2022 Regular Session, accessed August 13, 2025, https://billstatus.ls.state.ms.us/documents/2022/html/HB/1300-1399/HB1329IN.htm
5. Flood Insurance in Louisiana & Mississippi | Accessible Insurance, accessed August 13, 2025, https://www.accessibleins.com/flood-insurance-protect-your-home-from-the-most-costly-natural-disaster/
6. Abstract – University of West Georgia, accessed August 13, 2025, https://www.westga.edu/~bquest/2009/katrina09.pdf
7. Flood Insurance | FEMA.gov, accessed August 13, 2025, https://www.fema.gov/flood-insurance
8. National Flood Insurance Program – Jackson County, MS, accessed August 13, 2025, https://www.co.jackson.ms.us/205/National-Flood-Insurance-Program
9. Flood Insurance Coverage | Mississippi Farm Bureau Insurance, accessed August 13, 2025, https://msfbins.com/products/homeowners/flood/
10. Floodplain Management in Mississippi Quick Guide, accessed August 13, 2025, https://www.msema.org/sites/default/files/about/floodplan.pdf
11. Filing an Online Complaint – Official Website of the Mississippi Insurance Department, accessed August 13, 2025, https://www.mid.ms.gov/mississippi-insurance-department/consumers/filing-an-online-complaint/
12. File a Complaint – Official Website of the Mississippi Insurance Department, accessed August 13, 2025, https://www.mid.ms.gov/mississippi-insurance-department/consumers/file-a-complaint/
13. Strengthen Mississippi Homes Program – Knockout Inspections™, accessed August 13, 2025, https://koinspections.com/strengthen-mississippi-homes-program/
14. The Comprehensive Hurricane Damage Mitigation Program – Mississippi Insurance Department, accessed August 13, 2025, https://apps.mid.ms.gov/mitigation/strengthen-mississippi-homes.aspx
15. State Property Insurance | Mississippi Department of Finance and Administration, accessed August 13, 2025, https://www.dfa.ms.gov/state-property-insurance
16. Hazard Mitigation | Mississippi Emergency Management Agency, accessed August 13, 2025, https://www.msema.org/about/about-mema/hazard-mitigation
17. Available Grants | Mississippi Emergency Management Agency, accessed August 13, 2025, https://www.msema.org/about/mitigation/available-grants
18. Mississippi Code § 29-13-1 (2024) – Purchase of business property insurance and business personal property insurance on all state-owned buildings and contents thereof; participation in National Flood Insurance Program – Justia Law, accessed August 13, 2025, https://law.justia.com/codes/mississippi/title-29/chapter-13/section-29-13-1/
19. Mississippi Senators among those wanting FEMA to scrap Biden-era …, accessed August 13, 2025, https://magnoliatribune.com/2025/06/10/mississippi-senators-among-those-wanting-fema-to-scrap-biden-era-flood-insurance-premiums/
20. Private Market Flood Insurance, accessed August 13, 2025, https://privatemarketflood.com/
21. HURRICANE KATRINA: THE FIVE YEAR ANNIVERSARY – Insurance Information Institute, accessed August 13, 2025, https://www.iii.org/sites/default/files/1007Katrina5Anniversary.pdf
22. Hurricanes, Fraud, and Insurance: The Supreme Court Weighs in on, But Does Not Wade Into, the Concurrent Causation Conundrum in State Farm Fire and Casualty Company v. Rigsby – Insight @ Dickinson Law, accessed August 13, 2025, https://insight.dickinsonlaw.psu.edu/fac_works/355/
23. Hurricane Katrina: a watershed event for insurance | Swiss Re, accessed August 13, 2025, https://www.swissre.com/institute/research/topics-and-risk-dialogues/climate-and-natural-catastrophe-risk/hurricane-katrina-watershed-event-for-insurance.html
24. How to file a Bad Faith Claim Against Insurance Company in Mississippi – Van Cleave Law, accessed August 13, 2025, https://vancleavelaw.com/blog/mississippi-bad-faith-insurance/
25. National Flood Insurance Program Risk Rating 2.0: Frequently Asked Questions, accessed August 13, 2025, https://www.congress.gov/crs-product/IN11777
26. The Impact of the National Flood Insurance Program’s Risk Rating 2.0 on Southern Louisiana – Williams-Mystic, accessed August 13, 2025, https://mystic.williams.edu/files/2023/01/Luongo-D.-F22-Brief_.pdf
27. Rate Explanation Guide | FEMA, accessed August 13, 2025, https://www.fema.gov/sites/default/files/documents/fema_rsl_rate-explanation-guide_042025.pdf
28. FEMA Fact Sheet – Understanding Risk Rating 2.0: Equity in Action – Guilford County, accessed August 13, 2025, https://www.guilfordcountync.gov/femariskrating20factsheet2pdf/open
29. Risk Rating 2.0 | FEMA, accessed August 13, 2025, https://www.fema.gov/sites/default/files/documents/fema_rr-2.0_04-2025.pdf
30. NFIP Mississippi Rate Analysis Comparison – FEMA, accessed August 13, 2025, https://www.fema.gov/sites/default/files/documents/fema_ms-new-methodology-vs-old-methodology_narrative_2025.pdf
31. Mississippi — Risk Rating 2.0 | FEMA, accessed August 13, 2025, https://www.fema.gov/sites/default/files/documents/fema_mississippi-state-profile_04-2025.pdf
32. An Evaluation of Risk Rating 2.0 Impacts on National Flood Insurance Program Affordability, accessed August 13, 2025, https://csfi.info/wp-content/uploads/2022/09/CSFI-White-Paper-An-Evaluation-of-Risk-Rating-2.0-Impacts-on-National-Flood-Insurance-Program-Affordability.pdf
33. How to Keep Your Flood Insurance Cost as Low as Possible | Department of Insurance, SC, accessed August 13, 2025, https://doi.sc.gov/1021/How-to-Keep-Your-Flood-Insurance-Cost-as
34. Risk Reduction: Mississippi – Locations Mitigation Tools | FEMA.gov, accessed August 13, 2025, https://www.fema.gov/locations/risk-reduction/mississippi
35. Rebuild Better | National Flood Insurance Program, accessed August 13, 2025, https://www.floodsmart.gov/recover/rebuild-better
36. Community Rating System | FEMA.gov, accessed August 13, 2025, https://www.fema.gov/floodplain-management/community-rating-system
37. FEMA Community Rating System | Adaptation Clearinghouse, accessed August 13, 2025, https://www.adaptationclearinghouse.org/resources/fema-community-rating-system.html
38. Hattiesburg Earns Improved Community Rating System Score, Bringing Flood Insurance Discounts for Residents, accessed August 13, 2025, https://www.hattiesburgms.com/news-updates/hattiesburg-earns-improved-community-rating-system-score-bringing-flood-insurance-discounts-for-residents/
39. List of Mitigation Insurance Discounts and Tax Savings – Smart Home America, accessed August 13, 2025, https://www.smarthomeamerica.org/discounts-and-incentives/list-of-fortified-discounts-and-incentives
40. How To Lower Your Insurance Premium, accessed August 13, 2025, https://www.mid.ms.gov/wp-content/uploads/2024/07/Pressrel072324.pdf
41. Elevation Certificate | FEMA.gov, accessed August 13, 2025, https://www.fema.gov/about/glossary/elevation-certificate
42. Elevation Certificate | What it is and how to get one – Association of State Floodplain Managers, accessed August 13, 2025, https://www.floods.org/resource-center/elevation-certificate/
43. What Are Elevation Certificates? | The National Flood Insurance Program for Agents, accessed August 13, 2025, https://agents.floodsmart.gov/articles/what-are-elevation-certificates
44. Get an Elevation Certificate | National Flood Insurance Program, accessed August 13, 2025, https://www.floodsmart.gov/get-insured/elevation-certificates
45. Flood Information | Hinds County, Mississippi, accessed August 13, 2025, https://www.hindscountyms.com/flood-information
46. FEMA Flood Elevation Certificates – Alabama, Florida & Mississippi – Poly Surveying, accessed August 13, 2025, https://polysurveying.com/fema-flood-elevation-certificates/
47. Elevation Certificate | Flood Survey, accessed August 13, 2025, https://tupelolandsurveying.com/mississippi-services/elevation-certificate-flood-survey
48. Mississippi Flood Insurance Dispute Lawyers, accessed August 13, 2025, https://www.msb.law/mississippi-insurance-disputes/flood-damage/
49. Hurricane Katrina Anniversary Is a Reminder of the Importance of Property Insurance, accessed August 13, 2025, https://hkgclaw.com/practice-areas/hurricanes-natural-disasters/hurricane-katrina-anniversary-is-a-reminder-of-the-importance-of-property-insurance/
50. Mississippi Insurance Department – Official Website of the Mississippi Insurance Department, accessed August 13, 2025, https://www.mid.ms.gov/
51. What is My Flood Risk | The National Flood Insurance Program, accessed August 13, 2025, https://www.floodsmart.gov/flood-zones-and-maps/what-is-my-flood-risk
52. What Is Base Flood Elevation? | Progressive, accessed August 13, 2025, https://www.progressive.com/answers/what-is-base-flood-elevation/
53. Base flood elevation: What it is & how to find it – Kin Insurance, accessed August 13, 2025, https://www.kin.com/blog/base-flood-elevation/