Table of Contents
Introduction: The Comfort of the Unexamined Life
Dr. Aris Thorne remembered the day he signed his first employment contract with the clarity of a clinical diagnosis.
The paper was crisp, the ink a definitive black.
He was a physician, finally.
Years of grueling study, sleepless nights on call, and the crushing weight of student debt had culminated in this moment.
He scanned the document, his eyes, trained to spot the subtlest anomaly on a CT scan, gliding over the legal boilerplate.
He paused at the section titled “Professional Liability Insurance.” It was there, a line item confirming his coverage, provided by the practice.
He felt a quiet wave of relief.
It was a box checked, a problem he didn’t have to solve.
For Aris, malpractice insurance was a utility, like the electricity that powered the exam rooms or the water that ran from the taps.
It was simply there, a feature of the professional landscape, and he trusted it would work if ever needed.
This quiet confidence, he would later understand, was the first crack in his armor.
It was a byproduct of the very expertise that made him a good doctor.
A professional’s mind, honed over a decade to achieve mastery in a single, complex domain, can develop a dangerous cognitive bias—an “expert halo effect.” Accustomed to being the authority, the one with the answers, a professional can unconsciously assume a baseline of competence in adjacent, equally complex fields like insurance and law.
Why would he, an expert in human anatomy, question the judgment of the administrators who ran the business? Why would he spend his precious, limited time—time better spent reviewing patient charts or reading the latest clinical trials—deciphering the arcane language of a policy document?.1
His sense of security was further bolstered by the statistics of the thing.
While a sobering 31% of physicians report being sued at some point in their careers, the risk in any given year is deceptively low, hovering around 1.8% in recent years.3
A lawsuit felt like a remote possibility, a lightning strike for the unlucky or the careless.
He was neither.
He was diligent, compassionate, and skilled.
He believed, as many professionals do, that good work was its own shield.4
The insurance provided by his employer felt like a large, sturdy, communal umbrella, held by the building manager for all the tenants.
It seemed perfectly adequate for the occasional light drizzle he might encounter.
He never thought to ask if it was rated for a hurricane.
He never considered that when the storm came, he might find himself standing in it alone, watching the fabric tear away in the wind, leaving him utterly exposed.
Part I: The Unraveling — A Story of Struggle
The storm arrived on a Tuesday afternoon five years later, not with thunder and lightning, but with the quiet efficiency of a process server.
The manila envelope felt impossibly heavy in Aris’s hands.
Inside, the dense legal text swam before his eyes, but a few words leaped out with brutal clarity: Summons, Complaint, Negligence, Wrongful Death.
The patient’s name was one he vaguely recalled from his previous job, a small private practice he’d left two years ago.
The memory was hazy, a routine case with no apparent complications.
Now, it was the epicenter of a cataclysm.
His first call was to his current employer’s risk management department.
The response was polite, but firm.
Their policy did not cover his work at a previous practice.
He would need to contact his former employer.
That call led him into a bureaucratic labyrinth.
The small practice had been acquired by a massive regional hospital system a year after he left.
His old boss was long gone.
The HR department at the new conglomerate was apathetic; he was a ghost in their system, a loose end from a forgotten acquisition.
The paper trail was cold.5
After a week of frantic calls, the first devastating blow landed.
A terse email from a hospital administrator contained an attachment: a copy of the declarations page from his old policy.
The words were a foreign language, but two stood out to the lawyer he had been forced to hire.
The policy was “claims-made.” His lawyer explained the brutal mechanics: a claims-made policy only provides coverage if the incident occurs and the claim is filed while the policy is active.
Since he had left the practice two years ago, the policy was no longer active for him.
To be covered for a claim filed today about an incident from the past, he would have needed a special extension.
It was called “tail coverage.” And his former employer had never purchased it for him.6
He was, for the purposes of this career-threatening lawsuit, completely and utterly uninsured.
The ground had given way beneath him.
Every asset he had painstakingly built—his home, his savings, his children’s college funds—was now at risk to satisfy a potential judgment.8
The terror was paralyzing.
He thought of the real-world cases his lawyer mentioned, cautionary tales that were now his reality.
He pictured the occupational therapist, uninsured and facing a negligence claim, who was forced to sell her home and car and ultimately declare bankruptcy after a jury ordered her to pay the patient’s family $400,000.9
He thought of the independent contractor nurse who, mistakenly believing the hospital’s insurance covered her, was hit with a $495,000 share of a settlement, a sum that could have been covered by a standard individual policy.9
The crisis deepened as his lawyer explained the minefield he would have faced even if the claim had originated at his current job.
The communal umbrella, he was learning, was full of holes.
The Second Blow: The Limits of the Communal Umbrella
This hypothetical exploration was a new kind of horror.
It revealed that even when “covered,” a professional can be dangerously exposed.
The structure of employer-provided insurance, he discovered, creates a fundamental misalignment of incentives that only becomes visible in a crisis.
The professional’s most valuable assets—their personal wealth, their professional reputation, and their license to practice—are secondary to the employer’s primary concern: protecting its own balance sheet.
This isn’t born of malice; it is the cold, hard logic of risk management.
The insurance product is designed to protect the “named insured,” which is the company.4
The employee is merely an insurable component of that entity’s overall risk profile.
- A Conflict of Interest: In the event of a lawsuit naming both the institution and the employee, the employer’s insurance company typically appoints a single attorney or legal team. That attorney’s primary duty is to the policyholder—the hospital or practice, not to Aris.10 The insurer’s goal is often a “global settlement” that resolves the entire matter as cheaply and quickly as possible, regardless of an individual professional’s innocence or desire to defend their reputation.6 A settlement, after all, is often less costly than a full defense. But that same settlement, no matter how small, results in a permanent report to the National Practitioner Data Bank (NPDB), a federal database that future employers, hospitals, and state licensing boards can access.8 For the employer, it’s a closed file. For Aris, it would be a permanent stain on his career. In a crisis, the professional and their employer are not necessarily allies; they are parties with potentially conflicting objectives, tethered by a contract that structurally prioritizes one over the other.
- Shared and Diluted Limits: Employer policies often boast high liability limits, perhaps millions of dollars. However, this limit is typically a shared aggregate for all employees named in a suit.4 If a catastrophic event leads to a lawsuit against an entire care team—multiple physicians, physician assistants, and nurses—that shared pool of money can be depleted quickly to cover legal fees and settlements for numerous defendants. If the funds are exhausted before Aris’s part of the claim is resolved, he could be left personally responsible for paying the rest of the settlement out of his own pocket.11
- Dangerous Coverage Gaps: Aris’s mind raced back through the years, tallying the moments of unknowing exposure. The time he gave informal medical advice to a neighbor over the fence. The weekend he volunteered at a free health clinic. The brief period he considered a part-time telemedicine side gig. Employer policies are typically limited to actions taken within the scope of employment.4 None of those other activities would have been covered. His professional identity existed beyond the four walls of the clinic, but his protection did not.5
- A License in Peril: The most terrifying discovery was the one that struck at the very heart of his ability to practice. His lawyer explained that employer policies almost never provide coverage for legal defense in front of a state licensing board.10 A board complaint can be filed by anyone—a disgruntled patient, a rival colleague, or even the employer itself—for any reason, and it can trigger an investigation that could lead to the suspension or revocation of his license. These board actions are far more common than malpractice lawsuits; for nurses, they occur 47 times more frequently than malpractice settlements or judgments.10 Without individual coverage, he would have to find and pay for his own specialized attorney to defend his right to practice, a daunting and expensive prospect.14 The communal umbrella was designed to keep the building dry, not necessarily the people standing next to it.
Part II: The Education — An Epiphany in Fine Print
Humbled and facing potential ruin, Aris made a decision.
He would no longer be a passive participant in the defense of his own career.
He would become his own expert.
He retained a specialist insurance advisor, a sharp, no-nonsense woman named Elena, and a defense attorney, both paid for with a loan that made him sick to his stomach.
The conference room where they met became his classroom.
The fear that had paralyzed him began to transmute into a cold, focused determination.
This section of his life was a forced masterclass, and each concept Elena and his attorney explained was an epiphany, a beam of light illuminating the dark corners of the industry that held his fate in its hands.
The Two Worlds: Occurrence vs. Claims-Made
Elena started by drawing two parallel timelines on a whiteboard.
“There are two universes of liability insurance, Dr. Thorne,” she said.
“You were living in one, and you needed to be in the other.”
The first timeline she labeled “Occurrence.” She described it as a fortress.
An occurrence policy provides lifelong coverage for any incident that happened during the policy period, regardless of when the claim is eventually filed.6
“Think of it as buying a lifetime warranty for the work you performed in 2023,” she explained.
“If you had an occurrence policy from your old job, it wouldn’t matter that the lawsuit was filed today.
The policy from back then would activate and protect you.
It provides true, long-term peace of mind”.15
He learned that while these policies are superior for the professional, they are becoming increasingly rare because insurers struggle to predict and price the risk of claims that might surface decades in the future.6
The second timeline was labeled “Claims-Made.” This was the world Aris had unknowingly inhabited.
Elena depicted it as a temporary shield.
A claims-made policy protects you only if the alleged incident and the subsequent claim are both made while the policy is active and in force.17
“The moment you stopped working at that practice and they stopped paying the premium,” she said, tapping the whiteboard, “your shield for all your past work there simply vanished.”
The Tail That Wags the Dog: The Necessity of Tail Coverage
“So how do you fix a claims-made policy?” Aris asked, the desperation evident in his voice.
“You have to buy back the past,” Elena replied.
“That’s called ‘tail coverage.'”
She explained that the only way to patch the gaping hole left by a canceled claims-made policy is to purchase an Extended Reporting Period (ERP) endorsement, universally known as tail coverage.15
This is a separate, one-time insurance product that extends the window for reporting claims related to incidents that occurred during the original policy period.
It is the essential bridge that connects your past work to future safety.21
Then came the next shock.
The cost.
“A standard tail policy,” Elena said, “can cost between 150% and 200% of your final year’s premium”.18
Aris did the quick Math. His premium at the old job had been around $8,000 a year.
The tail coverage would have been a one-time bill for up to $16,000.
His former employer, by not purchasing it, had saved themselves a modest sum while externalizing a potentially catastrophic financial risk directly onto him.
“This should have been in your employment contract,” his attorney chimed in.
“You should always negotiate for the employer to be responsible for purchasing tail coverage upon your departure.
It’s a critical, non-negotiable point”.22
Elena noted an alternative: “prior acts” or “nose” coverage.
This is something a new insurer can sometimes be persuaded to offer, effectively covering the “tail” of the previous policy by setting the new policy’s retroactive date to the start of the old one.6
However, this requires seamless, continuous coverage and a willing new carrier.
For Aris, who had a two-year gap, this was not an option.
Wielding the Hammer: Consent-to-Settle and Defense Costs
His attorney took over the lesson, shifting from the policy’s structure to its function in a lawsuit.
“Assuming you have a policy,” he began, “the most important clause for protecting your reputation is the ‘Consent-to-Settle’ provision.”
He explained that a “Pure Consent-to-Settle” clause is the gold standard.
It gives the insured professional the absolute right to approve or reject any settlement offer.23
This is a powerful tool.
It prevents an insurer from settling a frivolous or weak claim just to save on legal costs, a move that would still result in a damaging NPDB report.12
“You get to decide if you want to fight to clear your name,” the attorney said.
He then contrasted this with the dreaded “Hammer Clause.” Many policies that appear to grant consent to settle contain this coercive provision.
It states that if the insurer recommends a settlement and the professional refuses, the professional then becomes personally liable for any trial judgment and all legal fees incurred beyond the amount of that initial settlement offer.26
“They give you the right to say no,” the attorney said grimly, “but they hold a financial hammer to your head to ensure you say yes.
It’s why some call it the ‘blackmail clause'”.28
Finally, the attorney covered the mechanics of Defense Costs.
“Are the costs of your legal defense ‘inside the limit’ or ‘outside the limit’ of your policy?” he asked.
Aris looked blank.
“If they are ‘inside the limit,'” the attorney explained, “every dollar spent on legal fees, expert witnesses, and court costs is subtracted from the total liability limit of your policy.” He gave a chilling example: a $1 million policy with defense costs inside the limit.
If legal fees reach $300,000, only $700,000 remains to pay a potential settlement or judgment.
If the judgment is for $1 million, the professional is personally on the hook for the $300,000 shortfall.26
A policy with defense costs “outside the limit” is superior, as it provides a separate pool of money for legal fees, preserving the full liability limit for damages.
It’s a critical, often overlooked detail that can mean the difference between security and bankruptcy.
This education was a bitter pill, but for the first time since being served, Aris felt a flicker of agency.
He was beginning to understand the architecture of his own predicament.
The choice between Occurrence and Claims-Made, he now realized, was not a simple financial decision.
It was a fundamental choice about who bears the immense, unpredictable risk of the “long tail” of professional liability.
The insurance industry’s widespread shift toward claims-made policies represented a massive, systemic transfer of that future risk from the insurer to the individual professional.
The lower upfront premium of a claims-made policy was not a discount; it was the bait.
It masked the deferred, and often much larger, cost of managing that long-tail risk yourself through the purchase of tail coverage.
The cheaper price today was an illusion, paid for by accepting a hidden and profound liability tomorrow.
To codify his new knowledge, Aris and Elena created a chart, a clear comparison to ensure he would never make the same mistake again.
| Feature | Claims-Made Policy | Occurrence Policy |
| Core Concept | Provides coverage if the incident and the claim both occur while the policy is active. Protection is temporary. | Provides coverage for any incident that occurs during the policy period, regardless of when the claim is filed. Protection is permanent for that period. |
| Coverage Trigger | The claim must be made and reported to the insurer during the policy period.16 | The negligent act or omission must have occurred during the policy period.15 |
| Coverage Window | A finite window. Once the policy is terminated, coverage for past acts ceases without an extension. | An indefinite window for past acts. The policy continues to cover incidents from the policy period forever. |
| Premium Structure | Lower initial premiums that “step-rate” up over several years before maturing.18 | Higher, stable premiums from the start. The cost does not increase over the life of the policy for the same coverage.18 |
| Portability | Not easily portable. Changing jobs or insurers necessitates the purchase of tail coverage or new prior acts coverage to avoid gaps.7 | Fully portable. The coverage for a specific period is locked in and follows you, providing seamless protection across job changes.30 |
| Tail Coverage | Essential upon policy termination (retirement, job change) to cover future claims from past work. A significant one-time expense.18 | Not required. The “tail” is inherently built into the policy structure, offering significant long-term cost savings.15 |
| Long-Term Risk | The professional bears the long-term risk and is responsible for managing and financing their own “long tail” exposure.31 | The insurance carrier bears the long-term risk of future claims, which is priced into the higher initial premium.18 |
| Analogy | A “Temporary Shield” that you must continuously maintain and pay to extend when you’re done. | A “Lifetime Warranty” on the work you performed during a specific year. |
Table based on information from.6
Part III: The Fortress — A Blueprint for a Solution
The lawsuit against Aris eventually settled.
The cost was immense, emotionally and financially, but with the help of his dedicated legal team and a painful loan, he survived.
The experience, however, had forged him into something new.
The naive confidence of his early career was gone, replaced by a disciplined, proactive vigilance.
He was no longer a passive consumer of insurance; he was the architect of his own fortress.
This final part of his journey became a blueprint, a practical and empowering guide for any professional determined to seize control of their own protection.
The ultimate lesson was this: true professional liability protection is not a product you simply buy, but a comprehensive system you must build.
The insurance policy is just one component—the reactive, financial backstop for when things go wrong.
The other, more critical components are proactive and preventative.
Relying solely on the policy is like having a state-of-the-art fire extinguisher but continuing to store oily rags next to the furnace.
The system requires three pillars: vetting your champion, architecting your policy, and practicing proactive defense.
Choosing Your Champion: Vetting the Insurance Carrier
Aris learned that the company behind the policy is as important as the policy itself.
A cheap premium from a shaky carrier is a fool’s bargain.
- Financial Strength: The first and most crucial step is to verify the insurer’s financial stability. An insurance policy is only a promise, and that promise is worthless if the company goes bankrupt. Aris was taught to use independent rating agencies like A.M. Best. He would now never consider a carrier with a rating lower than “A-” (Excellent) and would avoid any unrated company, as that often signifies a lack of transparency.1
- Reputation and Expertise: Next, he investigated the carrier’s reputation and specific experience within his field of medicine. He asked critical questions: Does the company have a dedicated risk management department with resources for physicians?.24 What is their track record in defending claims for his specialty?.32 Do they retain defense attorneys who are genuine experts in medical malpractice law, or generalists?.33 A carrier that specializes in healthcare understands the nuances of the profession and is better equipped to provide a robust defense.24
- Carrier Type: He also learned to distinguish between different types of insurers. The market includes traditional stock insurance companies (owned by investors), member-owned or mutual companies (owned by policyholders), and Risk Retention Groups (RRGs), which are liability insurance companies owned by their members.1 Each has a different structure and regulatory oversight, which can impact governance and stability.
Architecting Your Policy: Key Decisions for Individual Coverage
With a short list of strong carriers, Aris worked with Elena to construct his personal policy.
He was now in the driver’s seat.
- The Power of an Individual Policy: The decision to purchase his own policy was paramount. He now controlled the certificate of insurance, the definitive proof of his coverage.6 He was the sole named insured, meaning the policy’s limits were his alone, not diluted by sharing with colleagues.6 Most importantly, his attorney would have an undivided loyalty to him, eliminating the conflicts of interest inherent in employer-provided plans.4 His new policy was also fully portable, covering him for any volunteer work, side jobs, or telemedicine consultations, no matter where he practiced.4
- Setting Adequate Limits: Choosing the right liability limits—the maximum amount the insurer will pay per claim and in total for the policy year (the annual aggregate)—was a careful calculation. The standard is often $1 million per claim and $3 million aggregate, but this varies by specialty, state law, and personal risk tolerance.35 Surgeons, for instance, face a 90% chance of being sued in their career and require higher limits than lower-risk specialties like dermatology or psychology.37
- Scrutinizing Exclusions: Aris and Elena read the fine print of the policy, focusing on the exclusions section. They confirmed what was not covered. Standard exclusions often include intentional criminal acts, fraud, sexual misconduct, and disputes over fees.38 More nuanced exclusions can relate to specific procedures (e.g., certain surgical codes for an optometrist) or services (e.g., providing investment advice as a lawyer or accountant).41 Understanding these boundaries was critical to knowing the true scope of his protection.
Proactive Defense: Best Practices in Risk Management
The final pillar of Aris’s fortress was built not of paper, but of practice.
He transformed his daily habits, adopting a mindset of proactive risk management.
This is the preventative medicine for a professional career, the daily discipline that minimizes the chance of ever needing the “emergency room” of a lawsuit.
- Meticulous Documentation: He became religious about documentation. Every patient interaction, every informed consent discussion, every phone call, and the clinical rationale for every decision was recorded contemporaneously and clearly in the patient’s record. He knew that in a courtroom, years after the fact, the written record is often the most powerful witness.43
- Clear Communication and Expectation Management: He learned that many claims arise from misunderstandings and unmet expectations. He began using written engagement letters or service agreements with new clients to clearly define the scope of the professional relationship, what services would be provided, and what outcomes were realistic.2
- Systematized Practice and Quality Control: He implemented checklists and protocols in his practice to ensure consistency and quality. He established clear lines of responsibility among his team to prevent errors of omission.46 Furthermore, he created a formal process for handling and documenting patient or client complaints, allowing his team to address and resolve minor issues before they could fester and escalate into major legal problems.45
A malpractice claim doesn’t begin with a summons; it often begins years earlier with a breakdown in care, a miscommunication, or a lapse in documentation.
The proactive defense measures Aris implemented were his first and most important line of defense.
The quality of his insurance policy was the second.
Focusing only on the annual premium is like judging the safety of a car by its paint color while ignoring the airbags, brakes, and structural integrity.
The premium is merely the price of entry; the real investment is the time and diligence a professional spends building their entire defensive system.
To help others avoid his ordeal, Aris created a checklist—a personal audit tool to empower his colleagues to assess their own vulnerability.
| Checklist Item | My Policy (Yes/No/Details) | Why It Matters (Expert Insight) |
| Coverage Source | Do I have my own individual policy? | Employer policies prioritize the employer’s interests, not yours. An individual policy ensures undivided loyalty and control.4 |
| Policy Type | Is it Occurrence or Claims-Made? | Occurrence provides permanent coverage for a given period. Claims-Made is temporary and requires expensive tail coverage upon cancellation.15 |
| Continuity | If Claims-Made, is my tail/prior acts coverage secure and paid for? | A gap in coverage between a claims-made policy and its tail can leave you completely uninsured for all past work.8 |
| Liability Limits | Are my per-claim/aggregate limits adequate for my specialty and state? | Limits that are too low can expose your personal assets if a judgment exceeds your coverage. High-risk specialties need higher limits.36 |
| Settlement Control | Does my policy have a “Pure Consent-to-Settle” clause? | This gives you the power to defend your reputation by vetoing a settlement on a meritless claim, avoiding an unwarranted NPDB report.23 |
| Defense Costs | Are defense costs “outside” my liability limits? | “Inside the limit” policies erode your coverage with every dollar spent on legal fees, risking a shortfall you’ll have to pay yourself.26 |
| Carrier Quality | Does my insurer have an A.M. Best rating of “A-” or better? | An insurer’s financial strength is paramount. A low-rated or unrated carrier poses a risk of insolvency, rendering your policy worthless.1 |
| License Protection | Does my policy explicitly cover legal defense for licensing board complaints? | Board complaints are common and can end your career. Employer policies rarely cover this, leaving you to defend your license alone and at your own expense.10 |
| Scope of Practice | Does my policy cover all my professional activities (e.g., volunteering, side work, telemedicine)? | Employer policies typically only cover work done for that specific employer. An individual policy should be broad enough to cover your entire professional life.4 |
Table based on information from.1
Conclusion: The True Cost of Peace of Mind
Years later, Aris found himself mentoring a young physician just starting out, a woman who radiated the same mix of excitement and unexamined confidence he once had.
He didn’t just give her clinical advice.
He told her his story.
He explained that his individual malpractice policy was one of the most important investments he made each year.
He pulled out the declarations page of his own policy, a document he now reviewed annually with the same rigor he applied to a patient’s lab results.22
“This piece of paper,” he told her, “is not an expense.
It’s the purchase of certainty.
It’s the foundation that allows me to practice medicine with confidence, to focus on my patients without the constant, low-grade fear of financial ruin.”
He used an analogy he’d learned from Elena.
“Your ability to practice your profession,” he said, “is like a machine that prints money.
It’s your single greatest financial asset.
Would you own a machine that valuable and not insure it against breakdown?”.47
The ultimate solution, Aris had learned, was not just about buying a policy.
It was about embracing a mindset of proactive ownership over one’s professional life and destiny.
The paper shield of an insurance policy is essential, but it is only as strong as the knowledge of the person holding it.
The true cost of peace of mind is the annual premium, yes, but it is also the diligence required to understand what you are buying, the wisdom to choose the right protection, and the discipline to manage your risk every single day.
It is the price of ensuring that you can dedicate your life to your craft, secure in the knowledge that the fortress you have built around your career will stand against any storm.
Works cited
- 7 Biggest Mistakes MD’s Make in their Malpractice Insurance Coverage – HCP National, accessed August 14, 2025, https://hcpnational.com/7-biggest-mistakes-mds-make-in-their-medical-malpractice-insurance-coverage/
- Tips For Managing Professional Liability Risk – Allen Financial Insurance Group, accessed August 14, 2025, https://www.eqgroup.com/library/professional_tips/
- Medical Liability Claim Frequency Among U.S. Physicians, accessed August 14, 2025, https://www.ama-assn.org/system/files/policy-research-perspective-medical-liability-claim-frequency.pdf
- Why You Need Malpractice Insurance – Proliability, accessed August 14, 2025, https://www.proliability.com/resources/why-you-need-malpractice-insurance/
- Is your employer’s malpractice insurance enough? – CM&F Group, accessed August 14, 2025, https://www.cmfgroup.com/blog/healthcare-professionals/is-your-employers-malpractice-insurance-enough/
- Malpractice Insurance Basics – AAPA, accessed August 14, 2025, https://www.aapa.org/career-central/practice-tools/malpractice-insurance-basics/
- Malpractice Insurance 101: Understanding the Difference Between Claims-Made and Occurrence Policies – American Optometric Association (AOA), accessed August 14, 2025, https://www.aoa.org/practice/aoaexcel/aoaexcel-resource-updates/malpractice-business-owners-and-cyber-liability-insurance/malpractice-insurance-101-understanding-the-difference-between-claims-made-and-occurrence-policies
- What PAs Need to Know About Malpractice Insurance – AAPA, accessed August 14, 2025, https://www.aapa.org/news-central/2020/12/what-pas-need-to-know-about-malpractice-insurance/
- 4 Real-Life Examples of Medical Malpractice Cases | Berxi™, accessed August 14, 2025, https://www.berxi.com/resources/guides/medical-malpractice-insurance/examples/
- Thinking of relying on your employer’s malpractice coverage? Think again – NSO, accessed August 14, 2025, https://www.nso.com/Learning/Artifacts/Articles/Thinking-of-relying-on-your-employer-s-malpractice-coverage-Think-again
- 8 Reasons Your Employer’s Medical Malpractice Insurance Might Not Be Enough | Berxi, accessed August 14, 2025, https://www.berxi.com/resources/articles/why-you-need-your-own-malpractice-insurance/
- Consent to Settle: CRNAs Have Rights – AANA Insurance Services, accessed August 14, 2025, https://malpracticeinsurance.aana.com/consent-to-settle-crnas-have-rights/
- Important Considerations for Comparing Malpractice Insurance Policies for Healthcare Providers | HPSO, accessed August 14, 2025, https://www.hpso.com/Resources/Coverage-Information/Important-Considerations-for-Comparing-Malpractice-Insurance-Policies-for-Healthcare-Providers
- The Hidden Costs of Relying on Employer?Provided Insurance – CM&F Group, accessed August 14, 2025, https://www.cmfgroup.com/blog/healthcare-professionals/the-hidden-costs-of-relying-on-employerprovided-insurance/
- Claims Made vs. Occurrence – Oklahoma Academy of Physician Associates, accessed August 14, 2025, https://www.okpa.org/resources/malpractice-insurance/claims-made-vs-occurrence/
- Claims-Made Vs. Occurrence Policies: What Coverage Is Right For You?, accessed August 14, 2025, https://www.getbcs.com/blog/the-difference-between-occurrence-and-claims-made-insurance
- Understanding medical malpractice insurance | III, accessed August 14, 2025, https://www.iii.org/article/understanding-medical-malpractice-insurance
- Claims-Made vs. Occurrence Malpractice Insurance | MEDPLI, accessed August 14, 2025, https://medpli.com/occurrence-vs-claims-made-malpractice-insurance-whats-the-difference/
- Malpractice Insurance: What You Need to Know – PMC, accessed August 14, 2025, https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2793838/
- What is Medical Malpractice Insurance | MICA, accessed August 14, 2025, https://www.mica-insurance.com/mpl-coverage/mpl-101/
- Claims-Made Vs. Occurrence Coverage | NSO, accessed August 14, 2025, https://www.nso.com/Learning/Artifacts/Articles/Claims-Made-Vs-Occurrence-Coverage
- Medical liability insurance: What final-year residents should know, accessed August 14, 2025, https://www.ama-assn.org/medical-residents/transition-resident-attending/medical-liability-insurance-what-final-year
- Medical Malpractice Insurance for Physicians and Doctors – MedPro Group, accessed August 14, 2025, https://www.medpro.com/medical-malpractice-insurance
- What To Consider Before You Choose a Malpractice Insurance Company, accessed August 14, 2025, https://www.treloaronline.com/blog/malpractice-insurance-company-considerations
- Consent to Settle Provision – Safehold Special Risk, accessed August 14, 2025, https://www.safehold.com/insurance-programs/dentist-professional-plus/news-center/articles/2024/10-consent-to-settle-provision/
- Introduction to Medical Malpractice Insurance | Gallagher, accessed August 14, 2025, https://www.gallaghermalpractice.com/resources/introduction-to-medical-malpractice/
- Top Mistakes When Buying Medical Malpractice Insurance, accessed August 14, 2025, https://www.gallaghermalpractice.com/resources/mistakes-when-buying-medical-malpractice-insurance/
- Consent To Settle Provisions In Medical Malpractice Claims | Gilman & Bedigian, accessed August 14, 2025, https://www.gilmanbedigian.com/consent-to-settle-provisions-in-medical-malpractice-claims/
- How Defense Costs Are Handled In Medical Malpractice Lawsuits | Gilman & Bedigian, accessed August 14, 2025, https://www.gilmanbedigian.com/how-defense-costs-are-handled-in-medical-malpractice-lawsuits/
- Claims-Made vs. Occurrence Malpractice Insurance | ACP – American College of Physicians, accessed August 14, 2025, https://www.acponline.org/about-acp/about-internal-medicine/career-paths/residency-career-counseling/resident-career-counseling-guidance-and-tips/malpractice-insurance
- Occurrence vs. Claims Made Policies Explained – Insurance Training Center, accessed August 14, 2025, https://insurancetrainingcenter.com/resource/occurrence-vs-claims-made-policies-explained/
- 5 Things Psychiatrists Should Avoid When Buying Malpractice Insurance, accessed August 14, 2025, https://www.prms.com/prms-blog/articles/2014/july/5-things-psychiatrists-should-avoid-when-buying-malpractice-insurance/
- The ABC’s of Buying Legal Malpractice Insurance, accessed August 14, 2025, https://www.tlie.org/news-blog/the-abcs-of-buying-legal-malpractice-insurance
- A Doctor’s Guide to Selecting a Medical Malpractice Insurer, accessed August 14, 2025, https://osma.org/aws/OSMA/pt/sd/news_article/594992/_PARENT/layout_details-news/false
- Medical Malpractice Insurance – Learn about Coverage – GEICO, accessed August 14, 2025, https://www.geico.com/medical-malpractice-insurance/
- FAQ’s on Malpractice Insurance for the New or Suddenly Solo Attorney, accessed August 14, 2025, https://www.americanbar.org/groups/lawyers_professional_liability/resources/faqs_on_malpractice_insurance_for_the_new_or_suddenly_solo_attorney/
- 2025 Medical Malpractice Statistics – Maryland Personal Injury Lawyer, accessed August 14, 2025, https://www.millerandzois.com/medical-malpractice/medical-malpractice-statistics/
- What Is and Isn’t Covered by Malpractice Insurance?, accessed August 14, 2025, https://nowinsurance.com/blog/what-is-and-isnt-covered-by-malpractice-insurance/
- What Does Legal Malpractice Insurance Typically Not Cover? – Wisconsin Lawyers Mutual Insurance, accessed August 14, 2025, https://wilmic.com/what-does-legal-malpractice-insurance-typically-not-cover/
- Common Exclusions in Errors and Omissions (E&O) Insurance, accessed August 14, 2025, https://schlawpc.com/common-exclusions-in-errors-and-omissions-eo-insurance/
- Does your malpractice insurance cover you for these 5 common procedures? | AOA, accessed August 14, 2025, https://www.aoa.org/practice/aoaexcel/aoaexcel-resource-updates/malpractice-business-owners-and-cyber-liability-insurance/5-common-exclusions
- Understanding Key Exclusions in Legal Malpractice Insurance Policies, accessed August 14, 2025, https://pearlinsurance.com/understanding-key-exclusions-in-legal-malpractice-insurance-policies/
- Malpractice Case Studies – ProAssurance Risk Management, accessed August 14, 2025, https://riskmanagement.proassurance.com/malpractice-case-studies
- Charting Practices to Protect Against Malpractice: Case Reviews and Learning Points, accessed August 14, 2025, https://westjem.com/articles/charting-practices-to-protect-against-malpractice-case-reviews-and-learning-points.html
- Top 16 Ways to Reduce Professional Liability Exposure – Prime Insurance Company, accessed August 14, 2025, https://www.primeis.com/education-center/articles/ways-reduce-professional-liability-exposure/
- How to Minimize Professional Liability Risk: Five Practical Steps – McBrayer PLLC, accessed August 14, 2025, https://www.mcbrayerfirm.com/blogs-professional-malpractice-and-liability,professional-liability-risk
- The Best Life Insurance Quotes, Analogies & Memes – Life Design Analysis, accessed August 14, 2025, https://www.lifedesignanalysis.com/blog/the-best-life-insurance-quotes-analogies-memes?lng=en
