The Blueprint for Two: Why Your Joint Account Is a House, Not a Handshake, and How to Build It Right

Part 1: The Crack in the Foundation: My $500,000 Mistake

I call myself a financial architect now, but I didn’t always. For years, I was just a financial planner. I earned the new title through a failure that cost a wonderful couple their peace of mind and nearly half a million dollars. It’s a story I tell not for dramatic effect, but because it contains a lesson so vital it reshaped my entire profession.

Years ago, I sat down with Mark and Sarah. They were young, bright-eyed, and newly married, the kind of clients that make this job feel less like work and more like helping dreams take flight. They wanted to combine their finances and start investing for their future together. Following what was—and still is—standard industry practice, I helped them open a joint brokerage account.¹ We chose the most common type: Joint Tenants with Rights of Survivorship, or JTWROS. The process was simple, almost deceptively so. A few signatures, a transfer of funds, and voilà—they were official investment partners.³ It felt like a symbol of their new life, a financial manifestation of their vows. We all left the meeting smiling.

The call came nearly a decade later. It was Sarah, her voice strained. They were getting a divorce. And the joint account, that symbol of their partnership, had become a battlefield. The “simplicity” that had been so appealing at the start had morphed into a weapon. Because their account was a JTWROS, each of them had 100% control.⁶ In a moment of anger and fear, Mark had liquidated a significant portion of their portfolio and withdrawn the cash. Legally, he was within his rights. Emotionally and financially, it was devastating.⁶ The dream we had mapped out crumbled into a legal nightmare of frozen assets, competing claims, and bitter accusations.¹⁰

That failure haunted me. I had followed the textbook, given the standard advice, and yet, I had led them into a catastrophe. I had treated the joint account like a simple product, a box to be checked. My epiphany came weeks later, staring at a set of architectural blueprints on my desk. I realized the mistake wasn’t in the paperwork; it was in the paradigm. A joint account isn’t a product. It’s a legal structure. It’s a financial blueprint for a shared life.

The type of account you choose is the foundation. The rules of ownership are the load-bearing walls. The plan for what happens in a storm—like death or divorce—is the roof. And if you choose the wrong blueprint for the unique “terrain” of your relationship and the “climate” of your life, the structure is destined to crack under pressure. This is the “Simplicity Trap”: the ease of setting up a joint account masks the immense and often irreversible legal, tax, and relational complexities that lie dormant until a crisis strikes.⁶

From that day forward, I stopped being a planner and became an architect. I don’t just help people fill out forms; I help them design a financial house built to last. This guide is that blueprint. It’s the wisdom I wish I’d had for Mark and Sarah, and it’s what you need to know before you ever sign your name next to someone else’s.

In a Nutshell: The Architect’s View

• What is a Joint Brokerage Account? It’s an investment account owned by two or more people, allowing for pooled resources and shared decision-making.¹ It is a legally binding agreement where all owners are responsible for taxes, fees, and losses.¹⁴
• Why is the “Type” so Critical? The account type (e.g., JTWROS, TIC) is not a feature; it’s a legal framework that dictates control, inheritance rights, and creditor protection. Choosing the wrong one can lead to devastating, unintended consequences.⁶
• The Core Risk: The biggest danger is the “Simplicity Trap.” Easy setup lulls partners into a false sense of security, causing them to overlook the profound legal risks related to liability, control, and estate planning that are locked in the moment the account is opened.¹³
• The Architect’s Solution: You must approach opening a joint account not as a simple task, but as a design project. You must consciously choose the right legal foundation (ownership type) and understand how it will perform under the stress of major life events.

Part 2: The Blueprint: Designing Your Financial Structure

Building a shared financial life is like building a house. You wouldn’t start construction without a detailed blueprint, and you shouldn’t start a joint account without understanding its underlying structure. Each choice you make, from the foundation up, has profound implications for the stability and longevity of what you’re building together.

Pillar 1: The Foundation – Choosing Your Legal Ownership Structure

Before a single dollar is invested, you must choose the legal foundation of your account. This is the single most important decision you will make. It dictates ownership, control, and what happens when one owner is no longer in the picture. This isn’t a simple preference; it’s a binding legal framework.²

Blueprint Option A: Joint Tenants with Rights of Survivorship (JTWROS)

This is the most common design, the “standard foundation” offered by most brokerages.¹⁶ In a JTWROS account, all owners have an equal and undivided interest in the assets.¹⁷ The defining feature is the “right of survivorship”: when one owner dies, their share

automatically and immediately passes to the surviving owner(s). This transfer happens outside of the legal process of probate and supersedes any instructions in a will.¹⁹

• Best For: Married couples or committed long-term partners in stable relationships whose primary goal is to ensure the simplest possible transfer of assets to the survivor upon death.²¹
• Critical Flaw: The automatic right of survivorship is a double-edged sword. It is an inflexible legal directive. If you have children from a previous relationship and your will states they should inherit your portion of the investment account, a JTWROS titling with a new spouse will override your will entirely. Your new spouse will get 100% of the account, and your children will get nothing from it, regardless of your stated wishes.⁶

Blueprint Option B: Tenants in Common (TIC)

Think of TIC as a more flexible, “custom” foundation. Unlike JTWROS, owners in a TIC account can hold unequal shares—for example, one partner could own 60% and the other 40%, reflecting their contributions.¹⁸ The most crucial difference is that there is

no right of survivorship. When a TIC owner dies, their specified share does not go to the other account holder. Instead, it passes to their estate, where it is distributed according to the instructions in their will.²

• Best For: Business partners, siblings, or unmarried couples who contribute unequal amounts and want to maintain absolute control over who inherits their specific portion of the assets.¹⁴
• Key Feature: This is the blueprint for precise legacy planning. It ensures that your share of the financial house you built goes to your chosen heirs (like your children, a charity, or other family members) rather than automatically defaulting to your co-owner.¹⁷

Blueprint Option C: Tenancy by the Entirety (TBE)

This is a specialized, “fortified” foundation available only to married couples and only in certain states.² It functions much like a JTWROS account, as it includes the right of survivorship. However, it adds a powerful layer of armor: enhanced creditor protection.²⁴

• Best For: Married couples who live in a state that recognizes TBE, particularly if one spouse works in a high-liability profession (like a surgeon or business owner) and wants to shield their shared assets from potential individual professional lawsuits or debts.²¹
• Key Feature: In a TBE account, the assets are considered owned by the marital union itself, not by the individuals. Therefore, a creditor with a claim against only one spouse generally cannot seize the assets in the TBE account. Furthermore, one spouse cannot unilaterally sell or transfer assets from the account; both must consent, creating a “two-key” system of control.⁷

Blueprint Option D: Community Property

This is a regional architectural style, not an optional choice. If you are married and live in one of the nine community property states (Arizona, California, Idaho, Louisiana, Nevada, New Mexico, Texas, Washington, and Wisconsin), the law generally treats most assets acquired during the marriage as owned 50/50 by the marital “community”.¹⁶ Some of these states offer an account titling called “Community Property with Right of Survivorship,” which blends the automatic transfer of a JTWROS with the unique and powerful tax advantages of community property law.²⁸

• Best For: Married couples residing in community property states.
• Key Feature: The tax implications upon the death of a spouse are profoundly different and often vastly more favorable than in other states. This will be the focus of Pillar 4.

Feature	Joint Tenants with Rights of Survivorship (JTWROS)	Tenants in Common (TIC)	Tenancy by the Entirety (TBE)
Who Can Own?	Any two or more individuals.17	Any two or more individuals or entities.30	Married couples only, in specific states.2
Ownership Split	Always equal and undivided shares.18	Can be equal or unequal (e.g., 60/40).18	Equal and undivided, owned by the marital unit.26
Control	Any owner can act unilaterally (trade, withdraw).6	Each owner controls their share; can act on the whole account.7	Both spouses must consent for major actions.21
At Death	Deceased’s share passes automatically to survivor(s), bypassing will and probate.19	Deceased’s share passes to their estate, distributed per their will; subject to probate.2	Deceased’s share passes automatically to surviving spouse, bypassing will and probate.20
Creditor Protection	Vulnerable to creditors of any owner.6	Owner’s individual share is vulnerable to their creditors.14	Protected from creditors of only one spouse.24
Best For…	Stable couples wanting simple asset transfer at death.	Business partners; individuals needing to direct inheritance of their specific share.	Married couples in TBE states seeking maximum creditor protection.

Pillar 2: The Load-Bearing Walls – Daily Life and Shared Responsibilities

Once the foundation is chosen, you erect the walls. These are the rules of daily operation that your financial structure must support day-in and day-out. This is where the romantic ideal of partnership collides with the harsh legal reality of shared liability. This is the part of the blueprint Mark and Sarah never truly examined, and it’s where the first cracks in their financial house appeared.

Equal Access, Unequal Consequences

The core operational feature of a standard JTWROS account is also its greatest weakness: each owner has 100% access and control over 100% of the assets, regardless of who contributed the funds.⁶ This means one partner can, without the other’s knowledge or permission, execute trades, take out a margin loan, or withdraw the entire account balance.⁶ While you may enter the arrangement with a spirit of collaboration, the legal structure of JTWROS enables unilateral action. It’s a system built on absolute trust, which works perfectly until the moment it doesn’t.

This structural reality presents a fundamental contradiction that many couples overlook. They seek a joint account to foster collaboration, yet they often choose the JTWROS structure, which legally empowers individual action. A TBE account, by contrast, enforces collaboration by requiring joint consent for major transactions, creating a “veto power” for each spouse.⁷ The choice between these two isn’t just a minor detail; it’s a profound decision about the governance model of your financial life. Do you want a system that allows for autonomy based on trust, or one that mandates joint approval for security?

Joint and Several Liability: Your Partner’s Problems Are Your Problems

This is a critical legal concept you must understand. “Joint and several liability” means that if something goes wrong in the account, each owner is individually responsible for 100% of the liability.² If your partner makes a series of disastrous trades using margin and racks up a $50,000 debt, the brokerage can come after you for the full amount, even if you never approved or knew about the trades.

Worse, this liability extends beyond the account itself. If your co-owner has significant personal debts—from credit cards, a failed business, or a lawsuit—their creditors may be able to legally seize the assets in your joint account to satisfy those debts.⁶ It doesn’t matter if you contributed 99% of the funds in the account; from a legal perspective, your partner owns 100% of it, and so do their creditors. Your shared financial house is completely exposed to the financial storms of every person on the title.

Contributions, Withdrawals, and Privacy

For a standard (non-retirement) joint brokerage account, there are generally no IRS limits on how much you can contribute or when you can withdraw.¹² The mechanics are straightforward: either owner can typically authorize deposits and withdrawals. However, when a check is issued as a withdrawal, it will usually be made out to all account owners, requiring everyone’s endorsement to be cashed.¹⁸

This total transparency is often hailed as a benefit, fostering open communication about money.¹³ But it also means the complete erosion of financial privacy.¹³ Every purchase, every dividend, every trade is an open book. For many, this is a healthy expression of partnership. For others, it can lead to friction over differing spending habits, feelings of being scrutinized, and a loss of personal autonomy that can strain the relationship.⁸

Pillar 3: The Stress Test – How Your Blueprint Withstands Life’s Storms

A blueprint always looks perfect in calm weather. Its true integrity is only revealed when a storm hits. For any joint financial structure, the two most powerful storms are the death of an owner and the dissolution of the relationship. How your account is titled will determine whether your financial house stands firm or collapses.

Stress Test 1: Death of an Owner

The primary selling point for JTWROS and TBE accounts is their ability to avoid probate. Probate is the court-supervised process of validating a will and distributing a deceased person’s assets. It can be a lengthy, expensive, and public process.¹⁹ Because the “right of survivorship” automatically transfers ownership to the survivor, the assets in a JTWROS or TBE account pass directly, bypassing the probate courts entirely.¹³

However, this probate-avoidance “feature” can become a catastrophic bug if your estate plan is not perfectly aligned. The account titling is a powerful legal directive that supersedes your will.⁶ Let’s imagine a common scenario in a blended family:

1. You have children from a prior marriage.
2. You remarry and open a JTWROS account with your new spouse, intending it for your shared retirement.
3. Your will clearly states that upon your death, all your assets, including your share of the brokerage account, should be split between your new spouse and your children.
4. You pass away.

The result? Your will is irrelevant for that account. The JTWROS titling legally transfers 100% of the account’s assets to your surviving spouse. Your children receive nothing from that account. This is one of the most frequent and tragic estate planning errors, born from the “Simplicity Trap.”

The Tenants in Common (TIC) structure is the solution for this scenario. Because a TIC account has no right of survivorship, your designated share of the account assets will flow into your estate upon your death. From there, it will be distributed exactly according to the terms of your will, ensuring your children receive their intended inheritance.¹⁷ It requires probate, but in this case, that is precisely the tool you need to enforce your wishes.

Stress Test 2: Divorce

This was the storm that demolished Mark and Sarah’s financial house. In a divorce, a joint brokerage account is considered marital property and is subject to division by the court.⁹ But the legal process is slow, and the “equal access” rule of JTWROS is immediate.

In a contentious split, the joint account can become a financial battlefield. As my clients discovered, one party can legally drain the account before the other can get a court order to freeze it.¹⁰ This creates a toxic “race to the bank” dynamic that can poison negotiations and leave one partner financially vulnerable at the worst possible time.

Even in an amicable divorce, dividing the assets is complex. It’s not as simple as selling everything and splitting the cash, which could trigger massive capital gains taxes.¹⁰ The proper procedure involves formally notifying the brokerage firm, closing the joint account, opening two new individual accounts, and carefully allocating the assets. Some investments, like proprietary mutual funds or annuities, may not even be transferable, forcing a liquidation that could come with steep penalties and fees.¹⁰ This process requires careful navigation, ideally with the guidance of legal and financial professionals, to ensure an equitable and tax-efficient division.

Pillar 4: The Roof – Protecting Your Legacy with Advanced Tax Planning

The roof is what protects the value of everything you’ve built inside your financial house. For joint accounts, the most critical, complex, and frequently misunderstood component of that roof is a tax provision called the “step-up in basis.” Getting this right can save your surviving partner a fortune in taxes. Getting it wrong can leave them with a massive and unnecessary tax bill.

What is “Step-Up in Basis”? A Simple Explanation

When you buy an investment, like a share of stock, its original purchase price is its “cost basis.” If you sell it later for a higher price, you pay capital gains tax on the difference.²⁷

Example: You buy a stock for $10. Years later, it’s worth $110. Your unrealized capital gain is $100. If you sell it, you owe tax on that $100 gain.

The “step-up in basis” is a remarkable provision in the U.S. tax code. When you die and leave that appreciated stock to an heir, the IRS essentially forgives the capital gains tax accumulated during your lifetime. The heir’s cost basis is “stepped up” to the fair market value of the stock on your date of death.³⁹

Example Continued: You die when the stock is worth $110. Your heir inherits it. Their new cost basis is not your original $10, but the “stepped-up” value of $110. They can immediately sell the stock for $110 and owe zero capital gains tax.³⁸

The “Geographic Lottery”: A Critical Distinction in State Law

Here is where the blueprint becomes incredibly nuanced. The application of the step-up rule for a surviving spouse depends entirely on where you live. This creates a “Geographic Lottery” where two identical couples with identical assets can face wildly different tax outcomes.

• In Common Law States (The Majority of States): When a joint account is held as JTWROS, only the deceased spouse’s 50% share of the account receives a step-up in basis. The surviving spouse’s 50% share retains its original, low cost basis.²⁷ This leaves the survivor with a significant built-in tax liability.
• In Community Property States (Nine States): The law treats the assets as owned 100% by the marital “community.” Therefore, upon the death of one spouse, the surviving spouse receives a full, 100% step-up in basis on the entire account, including their own share.²⁸ This is a monumental tax advantage that can completely eliminate the capital gains tax burden for the survivor.

The difference isn’t trivial; it can amount to hundreds of thousands of dollars in tax savings, determined simply by your zip code at the time of death. This is an expert-level distinction that is absolutely critical for any couple with significant appreciated assets in a joint account.

Calculation Step	JTWROS in Common Law State (e.g., Florida)	Community Property (e.g., Texas)
Original Cost Basis	$200,000	$200,000
Value at Death	$1,200,000	$1,200,000
Deceased’s Share (Stepped-Up)	50% of value = $600,000	N/A (Entire property is stepped up)
Survivor’s Share (Basis)	50% of original basis = $100,000	N/A (Entire property is stepped up)
Survivor’s New Total Basis	$600,000 + $100,000 = $700,000	$1,200,000
Unrealized Capital Gain	$1,200,000 – $700,000 = $500,000	$1,200,000 – $1,200,000 = $0

As the table shows, the couple in the community property state can liquidate their entire $1.2 million portfolio with zero capital gains tax. The couple in the common law state is left with a $500,000 taxable gain. It’s the same couple, same money, same account—but a vastly different outcome dictated by state law.

Part 3: Beyond the Blueprint – When You Need a Different Kind of Structure

Sometimes, a standard joint account blueprint—no matter how well-chosen—isn’t the right structure for the job. Your needs might be simpler, or far more complex. In the world of financial architecture, this is like deciding between a simple pre-fabricated shed and a custom-built, steel-reinforced fortress. The two most important alternatives to a joint account are the Transfer on Death (TOD) designation and the Revocable Living Trust.

Alternative 1: The Pre-Fab Shed – Individual Account with Transfer on Death (TOD)

A TOD designation is a simple, elegant tool. You add it to an individual brokerage account (or other assets like bank accounts, where it’s often called Payable on Death or POD).⁴⁵ It functions like a beneficiary designation on a life insurance policy.

• Description: During your lifetime, you maintain 100% ownership and control of your individual account. The TOD designation does nothing until you pass away. Upon your death, the assets in the account transfer directly to the beneficiaries you named, completely bypassing the probate process.¹⁹
• Pros: It is incredibly simple to set up, usually just a form with your brokerage.⁴⁶ It allows you to maintain absolute individual control over your assets while you are alive. And it achieves the primary goal of probate avoidance quickly and inexpensively.⁴⁵
• Cons: A TOD is a blunt instrument. It offers no planning for your potential incapacity. If you become unable to manage your own affairs, your family would need a durable power of attorney to access the account, which financial institutions can sometimes be reluctant to honor.³⁶ It also provides no control or protection for your beneficiaries. The assets are transferred to them outright, which can be problematic if the beneficiary is a minor, has special needs, or struggles with managing money.³⁶

Alternative 2: The Custom-Built Fortress – The Revocable Living Trust

For maximum control, protection, and flexibility, the gold standard is the Revocable Living Trust. This is not just an account feature; it is a comprehensive legal entity that you create to hold and manage your assets.

• Description: You work with an attorney to create a trust document that acts as a detailed rulebook for your wealth. You then “fund” the trust by retitling your assets (your house, your brokerage accounts, etc.) into the name of the trust.³⁵ During your lifetime, you typically act as the trustee, so you retain full control to manage, spend, or sell the assets just as you did before.³⁵ The trust document names a “successor trustee” (e.g., a spouse, adult child, or corporate trustee) who will take over management if you become incapacitated or pass away.³⁵
• Pros: A trust is the ultimate architectural tool. It avoids probate.³⁵ It provides a seamless plan for
  incapacity. It offers immense control over distributions to your heirs (e.g., you can specify that a child receives their inheritance in stages at ages 25, 30, and 35). It can protect assets for beneficiaries with special needs or from a beneficiary’s potential creditors or divorce. And it keeps your financial affairs completely private, as probate records are public.³⁶
• Cons: This level of protection and control comes at a cost. Trusts are more complex and expensive to set up and maintain than a simple TOD designation. They also require the administrative diligence of properly funding the trust by retitling all your relevant assets.³⁵

Feature	Joint Account (JTWROS)	Individual Account + TOD	Revocable Living Trust
Control During Life	Shared control; either owner can act unilaterally.6	100% individual control.19	100% individual control (as trustee).35
Probate Avoidance	Yes.13	Yes.45	Yes.35
Incapacity Planning	No. If both owners are incapacitated, court intervention may be needed.	No. Requires a separate Power of Attorney.36	Yes. Successor trustee takes over seamlessly.35
Creditor Protection	Poor. Vulnerable to creditors of either owner.6	Good. Protects assets from beneficiary’s creditors before transfer.	Excellent. Can be structured to protect assets from your and your beneficiaries’ creditors.36
Cost/Complexity	Low. Easy to set up.4	Low. Simple form to add to an account.46	High. Requires legal drafting and funding.49
Best For…	Simple asset transfer between stable partners with no complex legacy goals.	Individuals wanting simple probate avoidance with full control during life.	Individuals/couples needing comprehensive planning for incapacity, complex inheritance, and asset protection.

Part 4: Conclusion: From Planner to Architect

The phone call from Sarah all those years ago was a painful turning point. It exposed the profound gap between standard financial practice and the complex, messy reality of people’s lives. The failure with their JTWROS account taught me that convenience is a poor substitute for structural integrity. It forced me to stop being a mere planner, handing out pre-fabricated solutions, and to become a financial architect.

Today, when a couple sits in my office, I don’t start by pulling out an account application. I start by unrolling a blank blueprint. We talk about the terrain of their relationship—their shared goals, their individual responsibilities, their families, their fears. We discuss the potential storms on the horizon—the “what ifs” of death, disability, or disagreement. We design their financial house together, deliberately choosing the foundation, walls, and roof that will not only serve them in the sunshine but shelter them in the storm.

You do not need to be a financial professional to adopt this mindset. You simply need to reject the “Simplicity Trap” and recognize that the choices you make when opening a joint account are not administrative details; they are foundational acts of financial construction.

Ask the hard questions. Are you building a simple structure for two people with perfectly aligned goals and a desire for automatic succession (JTWROS)? Or do you need a more complex design that allows for separate legacies and individual control (TIC)? Do you need the fortified creditor protection that only married couples in certain states can build (TBE)? Or does your situation demand a more robust structure altogether, like a trust?

The choice you make when you sign that form is the blueprint for your shared financial future. By approaching it with the diligence and foresight of an architect, you can build a structure that is not only convenient for today but strong, resilient, and protective enough to last a lifetime. You can build a house, not just a handshake.

Works cited

1. www.investopedia.com, accessed on July 26, 2025, https://www.investopedia.com/joint-brokerage-accounts-7497852#:~:text=joint%20brokerage%20account.-,What%20Is%20a%20Joint%20Brokerage%20Account%3F,and%20make%20trading%20decisions%20together.
2. Joint Brokerage Accounts: What You Need to Know – Investopedia, accessed on July 26, 2025, https://www.investopedia.com/joint-brokerage-accounts-7497852
3. What you need to open an account and begin investing – Vanguard, accessed on July 26, 2025, https://investor.vanguard.com/investor-resources-education/how-to-open-account
4. Things to Consider with a Joint Brokerage Account – Chase.com, accessed on July 26, 2025, https://www.chase.com/personal/investments/learning-and-insights/article/things-to-consider-with-a-joint-brokerage-account
5. And Two Become One: How to Combine Bank Accounts – Ramsey Solutions, accessed on July 26, 2025, https://www.ramseysolutions.com/relationships/married-couples-how-to-combine-bank-accounts
6. Joint Brokerage Accounts: The Pros and Cons – Nasdaq, accessed on July 26, 2025, https://www.nasdaq.com/articles/joint-brokerage-accounts-pros-and-cons-2019-02-03
7. Individual vs. Joint Brokerage Accounts – SmartAsset, accessed on July 26, 2025, https://smartasset.com/investing/individual-vs-joint-brokerage-account
8. Things to Consider Before Opening a Joint Bank Account | Ally, accessed on July 26, 2025, https://www.ally.com/stories/marriage/joint-bank-account/
9. How to Handle Joint Accounts During a Divorce, accessed on July 26, 2025, https://www.secondsaturday.com/how-to-close-down-joint-accounts-during-a-divorce/
10. 6 Tips for Managing Investments Through Divorce | FINRA.org, accessed on July 26, 2025, https://www.finra.org/investors/insights/6-tips-managing-investments-through-divorce
11. Dividing Investment Accounts and Bank Accounts in Divorce | Dallas Family Law Lawyers, accessed on July 26, 2025, https://www.mcclure-lawgroup.com/dividing-investment-accounts-and-bank-accounts-in-divorce.html
12. The Benefits of Having a Taxable Individual or Joint Brokerage Account | Francis LLC., accessed on July 26, 2025, https://francisway.com/article/the-benefits-of-having-a-taxable-individual-or-joint-brokerage-account/
13. Pros and Cons of Joint Account Ownership, accessed on July 26, 2025, https://www.brmmlaw.com/blog/2025/march/pros-and-cons-of-joint-account-ownership/
14. Two Heads, One Account: The Perks & Pitfalls of a Joint Brokerage Account, accessed on July 26, 2025, https://www.the-ifw.com/blog/investment-strategies/joint-brokerage-account/
15. The Pros and Cons of a Joint Bank Account, accessed on July 26, 2025, https://www.centralbank.net/learning-center/the-pros-and-cons-of-a-joint-bank-account/
16. Types of Brokerage Accounts | Charles Schwab, accessed on July 26, 2025, https://www.schwab.com/brokerage/types-of-brokerage-accounts
17. Joint Tenancy: Benefits and Pitfalls – Investopedia, accessed on July 26, 2025, https://www.investopedia.com/articles/pf/08/joint-tenancy.asp
18. Joint accounts | Account registrations | Brokerage accounts | Achievable SIE, accessed on July 26, 2025, https://app.achievable.me/study/finra-sie/learn/brokerage-accounts-account-registrations-joint-accounts
19. Plan Now to Smooth the Transfer of Your Brokerage Account Assets on Death | FINRA.org, accessed on July 26, 2025, https://www.finra.org/investors/insights/plan-ahead-transfer-your-brokerage-account-assets-death
20. Investment Accounts: Transfer Of Death – Fidelity, accessed on July 26, 2025, https://www.fidelity.com/life-events/estate-planning/asset-strategies/brokerage
21. What Is a Joint Brokerage Account and When Should You Use One?, accessed on July 26, 2025, https://smartasset.com/investing/joint-brokerage-account
22. Should You Open a Joint Brokerage Account? – SoFi, accessed on July 26, 2025, https://www.sofi.com/learn/content/joint-brokerage-account/
23. Investing With Your Spouse – FMP Wealth Advisers, accessed on July 26, 2025, https://fmpwa.com/investing-with-your-spouse/
24. Types of Ownership for Brokerage Accounts – Meld Financial, accessed on July 26, 2025, https://meldfinancial.com/saving-investing/types-ownership-brokerage-accounts/
25. Sole Ownership vs. Joint Tenancy vs Community Property with Right of Survivorship vs. Tenants in Common | Advantages and Disadvantages – Keystone Law, accessed on July 26, 2025, https://keystone-law.com/sole-ownership-vs-joint-tenancy-vs-community-property-with-right-of-survivorship-vs-tenants-in-common
26. Know the Difference: Tenants by the Entirety vs. Joint Tenants with Rights of Survivorship – PlanWell Financial Planning, accessed on July 26, 2025, https://www.planwellfp.com/know-the-difference-tenants-by-the-entirety-vs-joint-tenants-with-rights-of-survivorship/
27. What is a step-up in cost basis and how can it affect me? – Fidelity Investments, accessed on July 26, 2025, https://www.fidelity.com/learning-center/personal-finance/what-is-step-up-in-basis
28. Joint Tenants vs Community Property: Right of Survivorship – Trust & Will, accessed on July 26, 2025, https://trustandwill.com/learn/joint-tenants-vs-community-property-with-right-of-survivorship
29. Understanding right of survivorship: What you need to know | Rocket Mortgage, accessed on July 26, 2025, https://www.rocketmortgage.com/learn/community-property-with-right-of-survivorship
30. Joint Account – Janus Henderson Investors – US Investor, accessed on July 26, 2025, https://www.janushenderson.com/en-us/investor/resources/planning/explore-account-types/joint-account/
31. Explore How to Manage a Joint Brokerage Account | B2PRIME, accessed on July 26, 2025, https://b2prime.com/news/what-is-a-joint-brokerage-account-and-how-do-you-manage-it
32. Can I get thoughts on joint bank accounts? : r/personalfinance – Reddit, accessed on July 26, 2025, https://www.reddit.com/r/personalfinance/comments/16hr0ew/can_i_get_thoughts_on_joint_bank_accounts/
33. What is a Brokerage Account | Charles Schwab, accessed on July 26, 2025, https://www.schwab.com/brokerage/what-is-a-brokerage-account
34. Opening a joint bank account with your significant other? Get the …, accessed on July 26, 2025, https://www.commercebank.com/personal/ideas-and-tips/2025/joint-bank-account
35. Should I Put My Assets in a Trust? Top 3 Benefits of Living Trusts, accessed on July 26, 2025, https://darrowwealthmanagement.com/blog/why-put-assets-in-a-living-trust/
36. TOD Accounts Versus Revocable Trusts – Which Is Better? | Kiplinger, accessed on July 26, 2025, https://www.kiplinger.com/personal-finance/banking/savings/603860/tod-accounts-versus-revocable-trusts-which-is-better
37. How divorce may affect a stock brokerage account | Stahly Miner LLC, accessed on July 26, 2025, https://www.stahlyllc.com/blog/2022/04/how-divorce-may-affect-a-stock-brokerage-account/
38. “Step-Up in Basis” for Inherited Assets Explained – SD Mayer, accessed on July 26, 2025, https://www.sdmayer.com/resources/step-up-in-basis
39. Leaving assets to your heirs: Could you benefit from a step up in basis? | T. Rowe Price, accessed on July 26, 2025, https://www.troweprice.com/personal-investing/resources/insights/step-up-in-basis-which-accounts-to-spend-down-and-which-to-preserve-for-your-heirs.html
40. Step-Up in Basis: Definition and How It Works for Inherited Property – Investopedia, accessed on July 26, 2025, https://www.investopedia.com/terms/s/stepupinbasis.asp
41. BASIS STEP-UP 101 – Meyer Estate Law, P.C., accessed on July 26, 2025, https://danapointwills.com/basis-step-up-101/
42. Using Gifting Between Spouses To Maximize Step-Up In Basis, accessed on July 26, 2025, https://www.kitces.com/blog/step-up-in-basis-gifting-assets-spouses-estate-tax-unrealized-gains-separate-property-states/
43. How Does a Step Up in Basis Work When a Spouse Dies? – Jones Elder Law, accessed on July 26, 2025, https://joneselderlaw.com/step-up-in-basis-spouse-dies/
44. Joint Tenancy vs. Community Property | Danville Estate Attorney – Gagen McCoy, accessed on July 26, 2025, https://www.gagenmccoy.com/trusts-and-estate-planning/joint-tenancy-vs-community-property/
45. Important Considerations for Brokerage Accounts and Estate Planning, accessed on July 26, 2025, https://www.findlaw.com/forms/resources/estate-planning/important-considerations-for-brokerage-accounts-and-estate-planning.html
46. Difference Between Transfer on Death and Payable on Death Designation | James Kreitler, accessed on July 26, 2025, https://www.kreitlerlawfirm.com/difference-between-transfer-on-death-and-payable-on-death-designation
47. Transfer on Death (TOD): What It Is and How It Helps Loved Ones Avoid Probate, accessed on July 26, 2025, https://www.investopedia.com/terms/t/transferondeath.asp
48. Should you opt for a TOD account or revocable trust?, accessed on July 26, 2025, https://www.blazierlaw.com/blog/2022/08/should-you-opt-for-a-tod-account-or-revocable-trust/
49. What Assets Should Not Be Placed in a Revocable Trust? – Kiplinger, accessed on July 26, 2025, https://www.kiplinger.com/retirement/estate-planning/604051/what-assets-should-be-included-in-your-trust
50. Transfer on Death Deed v. Trust: Why a Trust May Be Better | Chuck Roulet, Attorney at Law, accessed on July 26, 2025, https://www.rouletlaw.com/blog/transfer-on-death-deed-v-trust-why-a-trust-may-be-better.cfm