Table of Contents
My name is Alex, and for 15 years, I was what you’d call a model homeowner.
I kept the gutters clean, the paint fresh, and the insurance premiums paid on time, every time.
I saw that policy not just as a contract, but as a promise—a shield held by a trusted partner, ready to protect my family’s biggest investment.
I believed that if disaster ever struck, they’d be there.
Then, one Tuesday afternoon in May, disaster struck.
It came in the form of a hailstorm that sounded like a drum solo on our roof, performed with baseballs.
When it was over, the sky was clear, but our home was a wreck.
The siding was pockmarked, the windows were cracked, and the roof looked like it had been savaged.
But through the shock, a single thought brought me comfort: This is why we have insurance.
That comfort lasted exactly 27 days.
It died with the arrival of a single, sterile-looking envelope.
Inside was a letter from my insurer—my “partner”—and a check for $3,800.
The letter was a masterpiece of polite dismissal, a labyrinth of jargon about “wear and tear,” “gradual deterioration,” and something called “Actual Cash Value.” The contractor’s estimate to make our home whole again? Over $30,000.
That letter wasn’t just a denial; it was a profound betrayal.
It plunged me into a world of stress, confusion, and powerlessness I wouldn’t wish on anyone.1
I had played by all the rules, and yet, I was losing a game I didn’t even know I was playing.
It was only after weeks of sleepless nights and fruitless arguments that the epiphany hit me, a realization that changed everything:
My insurance company wasn’t my partner. They were a foreign power, and my policy was a treaty I had never learned to read.
This is the story of how I learned to read it.
It’s the story of how I went from being a victim of the system to understanding its rules.
And it’s the story of how I discovered the one move that levels the playing field against a billion-dollar industry: hiring the right kind of lawyer.
In a Nutshell: Your Quick Guide to the Insurance Battlefield
For those of you in the thick of it right now, here are the critical takeaways from my journey:
- What Does an Insurance Claims Lawyer Do? An insurance claims lawyer is a legal professional who represents you, the policyholder, against your insurance company. Their job is to interpret your policy, document your loss, handle all communications, negotiate a fair settlement, and, if necessary, sue the insurer for breach of contract or “bad faith”.3 They act as your advocate and expert in a complex and often adversarial system.
- When Should You Hire One? You should consider hiring an insurance lawyer when your claim is complex, high-value, or has been unfairly denied, delayed, or underpaid.5 If the insurer uses confusing jargon to justify a low offer, disputes the cause of damage, or advises you against getting legal help, it’s a major red flag.8
- What’s the Difference Between a Lawyer and a Public Adjuster? A public adjuster is an expert in assessing property damage and estimating repair costs. They build the evidence for your claim. An insurance lawyer is an expert in the law and your policy. They use the evidence to enforce your legal rights.10 They often work together: the adjuster quantifies the loss, and the lawyer provides the legal leverage to get it paid.12
- What Does It Cost? Most insurance claims lawyers work on a contingency fee basis. This means they only get paid if they successfully recover money for you, typically taking a percentage of the settlement.13 You pay nothing upfront.
- Is It Worth It? Yes. Studies from independent bodies like the Insurance Research Council have consistently shown that claimants who hire an attorney receive settlements that are, on average, 3 to 3.5 times higher than those who handle claims on their own, even after accounting for legal fees.15
Part I: The Setup – My Painful Education in “Standard Advice”
Chapter 1: Walking into the Labyrinth: My First Steps in the Claims Process
In the immediate aftermath of the storm, I did everything by the book.
I called my insurance company’s 24-hour hotline.
I took hundreds of photos, documenting every dented gutter and shattered shingle.19
I even climbed onto the roof with a tarp to prevent further water damage, just like all the guides say to do.21
I was diligent.
I was organized.
I was, in retrospect, completely naive.
A week later, their adjuster arrived.
He was friendly, empathetic, and seemed incredibly knowledgeable.
He walked the property with me, nodding sympathetically, pointing out areas of concern, and assuring me, “Don’t worry, this is exactly what you have coverage for.” He left me with a handshake and a sense of profound relief.
My partner had shown up.
But that initial interaction, I now understand, is a strategic part of the process.
It establishes a rapport that makes what comes next feel less like a calculated financial decision and more like a bureaucratic hiccup.
It disarms you, encouraging you to work within their system rather than challenging it.
The weeks that followed were a slow descent into bureaucratic purgatory.
Phone calls went to voicemail.
Emails received automated replies.
The friendly adjuster was suddenly “in the field” and unreachable.
I was passed to a desk agent who requested the same photos I had already sent, then asked for contractor estimates, which I dutifully provided.
Each step was followed by a period of profound silence, a waiting game that frayed my nerves and amplified my anxiety.1
The process wasn’t designed for clarity or speed; it was designed to manage me, to contain my claim within a labyrinth of their own making.
Chapter 2: The Denial and the Downward Spiral
Then came the letter.
It was the moment the game’s true nature was revealed.
The insurer wasn’t denying the storm happened, but they were masterfully denying their responsibility for it.
They did this using two powerful weapons I was completely unprepared for.
Weapon 1: The “Wear and Tear” Exclusion
The letter stated that their expert had determined the primary cause of my roof’s failure was not the “acute weather event” but its age and “pre-existing wear and tear.” This is a classic insurance tactic.
Policies are designed to cover sudden and accidental damage, not gradual deterioration.24
By invoking this exclusion, they can reframe a covered event (a massive hailstorm) as the final straw for a non-covered condition (an old roof).
I was stunned.
My roof was 16 years old, well within its expected lifespan, and had never had a single leak.
But in the language of my policy—a document I had never truly read—they had found their O.T. It didn’t matter that dozens of my neighbors with roofs of similar age were getting full replacements from their insurers.
My company had made its determination.26
Weapon 2: The Depreciation Trap (Actual Cash Value vs. Replacement Cost)
For the minimal damage they did agree to cover (a few sections of siding), they introduced their second weapon: depreciation.
The letter explained my policy would pay the Actual Cash Value (ACV) of the damaged property.
I quickly learned the brutal math behind this term.
- Replacement Cost Value (RCV) is what it would actually cost to buy new siding and have it installed today. Let’s say that’s $5,000.28
- Actual Cash Value (ACV) is the replacement cost minus depreciation. The insurer decided my 16-year-old siding had lost 80% of its value over time. So, they took the $5,000 replacement cost and subtracted $4,000 for depreciation, leaving an ACV of just $1,000.30
After subtracting my $1,000 deductible, their payout for the siding was literally zero.
They had used the concept of depreciation to make their coverage disappear.
Some policies, known as RCV policies, will eventually pay you that depreciation amount back, but only after you’ve completed the repairs and submitted receipts—a process that requires you to front thousands of dollars you may not have.28
My policy, like many, was ACV-based for parts of the structure, a detail buried in the fine print.
The combined effect was devastating.
The home I had meticulously maintained was now a source of constant stress.
Every time it rained, I worried about leaks.
The financial pressure was immense, a dark cloud hanging over every family decision.
But worse than the money was the feeling of being cheated.
I had paid them for peace of mind, and in return, they had handed me a crisis.
This emotional toll is not an accident; it’s a feature of the system.
The financial pressure, the confusion, the exhaustion—it all serves to weaken your resolve.
It’s designed to make you feel so desperate that you’ll accept any offer, no matter how unfair, just to make the nightmare end.34
Research has shown that the secondary stress from fighting an insurance company after a disaster can be more psychologically damaging than the disaster itself.36
I was living proof.
I was being worn down, and that was exactly the point.
Part II: The Epiphany – It’s Not a Partnership, It’s a Negotiation
Chapter 3: The Diplomatic Cable Analogy: A New Way of Seeing
I spent weeks arguing.
I sent more photos.
I got more contractor quotes.
I wrote long, impassioned emails to the claims department.
Each attempt was met with the same polite, immovable resistance.
I was speaking English, but they were responding in a language of clauses and exclusions I couldn’t comprehend.
I was playing checkers while they were playing a grandmaster-level game of chess.
Then, one night, staring at the ceiling and worrying about the next rainfall, it hit me.
The metaphor that had framed my entire approach was wrong.
This wasn’t a partnership.
It wasn’t a customer service issue.
Dealing with my insurance company was a high-stakes diplomatic negotiation with a sovereign entity.
Suddenly, everything made sense.
- The Insurance Company was a foreign power. It has its own language, its own laws, and its own prime directive: to protect its own interests, which are profit and shareholder value, not my well-being.8
- My Insurance Policy was a complex treaty. It was written by their lawyers, in their language, filled with carefully crafted articles, protocols, and exceptions designed to limit their obligations while maximizing their advantages.4
- The Adjuster was their diplomat. He was trained, skilled, and his job was to represent the interests of his government, not to be my friend. His initial warmth wasn’t a lie, but a diplomatic tactic to establish favorable terms of engagement.34
- And I was an untrained citizen, stranded in this foreign land, trying to negotiate the terms of a treaty I didn’t understand, against a professional who did this every single day.
This reframing was liberating.
It took the emotion of betrayal out of the equation and replaced it with strategic clarity.
This wasn’t personal.
It was business.
And I was losing because I had brought the wrong tools to the fight.
I didn’t need to argue louder; I needed an ambassador.
I needed someone who spoke their language.
Chapter 4: Decoding Their Foreign Policy: The Insurer’s Playbook
Viewed through this new diplomatic lens, the confusing and frustrating tactics I had experienced snapped into focus as a coherent strategy.
This wasn’t random bureaucracy; it was a playbook.
They were running plays designed to exploit my lack of expertise and my emotional vulnerability.
This playbook is used every day against thousands of homeowners.
It includes maneuvers like:
- Offering Quick, Lowball Settlements: This is often the first move, especially in a clear-cut case. The insurer offers a fast check that seems reasonable at first glance.34 They frame it as helping you get back on your feet quickly. The real goal is to get you to sign a release, closing the claim for pennies on the dollar before you’ve had time to get proper estimates or discover the full extent of the damage.8
- Weaponizing Delays: The endless requests for paperwork and the long periods of silence are not just poor service; they are a form of economic warfare. The insurer knows that while they wait, your financial pressure mounts.35 The roof is still leaking, and the bills are piling up. The delay is designed to make you desperate enough to accept their next low offer.41
- Misrepresenting the Policy: The adjuster might tell you, “Oh, that’s not covered,” citing a vague clause. They are betting you haven’t read the 80-page policy document and won’t have the legal expertise to challenge their interpretation.35 They exploit the complexity of the “treaty” they wrote.
- Advising Against Legal Help: This is the most blatant tactic. An adjuster might say something like, “Let’s try to keep lawyers out of this. It’ll just complicate things and slow it down.”.8 This is a clear signal that they want to maintain their power advantage. It’s like a foreign diplomat saying, “You don’t need to consult your own government; just trust me.”
To make this crystal clear, here is a breakdown of their diplomatic playbook and the proper counter-moves.
| The Diplomatic Playbook |
| Insurer’s Tactic (The “Diplomatic Maneuver”) |
| The “Goodwill” Lowball Offer |
| The “Bureaucratic” Delay |
| The “Ambiguous Language” Defense |
| The “Expert” Undervaluation |
| The “Friendly Advice” Against Counsel |
Seeing it laid out like this was my final wake-up call.
I wasn’t in a customer service dispute.
I was in an adversarial negotiation, and I was outmatched.
It was time to hire my ambassador.
Part III: The Solution – Assembling Your Diplomatic Corps
Chapter 5: Hiring Your Ambassador: The Insurance Claims Lawyer
The day I hired an attorney was the day the power dynamic shifted.
The change was immediate and palpable.
My lawyer’s first action was to send a formal letter of representation to the insurance company.
From that moment on, the insurer was legally required to cease all direct communication with me.
The phone calls stopped.
The frustrating emails ended.
A shield was now in place.43
This is the first and most profound value of a lawyer: they take you off the front lines.
But their work goes far deeper.
An insurance claims lawyer is your multi-talented ambassador, equipped to fight for you on every front.3
They are your official representative. They handle all communications, translating the insurer’s complex jargon and shielding you from the high-pressure tactics of adjusters.
They create a professional buffer that allows you to focus on your life while they manage the fight.21
They are your treaty expert. A good policyholder lawyer lives and breathes insurance law.
They took my 80-page policy—that dense, impenetrable “treaty”—and dissected it.
They found clauses and coverages I never knew existed, like provisions for matching materials.
For instance, if hail damages the siding on one side of your house, a “matching exclusion” might mean the insurer only has to replace that one side, leaving you with a mismatched home.45
My lawyer knew how to challenge these exclusions, citing state-specific laws and legal precedents that favor the policyholder when policy language is ambiguous.40
They build your case. My lawyer didn’t just argue; they built an ironclad case.
They immediately brought in a trusted public adjuster.
This is a critical distinction to understand:
- A Public Adjuster is a licensed professional who works for you to assess and document the full scope of your property damage. They are the damage experts. They climb on the roof, measure everything, and create a highly detailed, line-item estimate of what it will cost to make you whole.10
- An Attorney is the legal expert who takes the public adjuster’s report and uses it as evidence to enforce the terms of your insurance contract.11
Together, they form a powerful team.
The public adjuster provided a 30-page report detailing every single damaged shingle, with repair costs based on current local labor and material rates.
My lawyer then packaged this into a formal demand letter sent to the insurance company.
We were no longer just complaining; we were presenting a formal, evidence-backed claim for a specific dollar amount.
They are your credible threat. This is perhaps the most important role.
The insurance company’s entire business model for disputes is based on the assumption that you, the homeowner, cannot or will not sue them.
A lawsuit is expensive, time-consuming, and requires immense legal expertise.
By hiring a lawyer, you are signaling that you have both the means and the will to take the fight to court.4
This single fact completely changes their cost-benefit analysis.
Suddenly, stonewalling you and dragging things out becomes a risky proposition that could lead to an expensive lawsuit.
It is often cheaper for them to offer a fair settlement than to pay their own lawyers to fight yours.
The lawyer’s greatest weapon is often the ability to make a lawsuit unnecessary.
Chapter 6: The Power of a “Bad Faith” Claim: The Ultimate Leverage
During this process, my lawyer introduced me to the most powerful concept in insurance law: “bad faith.” In our diplomatic analogy, this is the equivalent of accusing the other side of violating the Geneva Conventions.
It elevates the dispute from a simple contract disagreement to a claim that the insurer has engaged in unfair and unethical conduct.
Insurance bad faith is a legal tort that occurs when an insurance company fails to honor its obligations without a reasonable basis for doing so.47
It isn’t just about disagreeing on the value of a claim.
It’s about the insurer’s
conduct.
Examples of bad faith practices include:
- Denying a claim without conducting a reasonable and thorough investigation.50
- Unreasonably delaying payment of a valid claim.52
- Offering significantly less than a claim is worth (a “lowball” offer) without a fair justification.54
- Misrepresenting facts or insurance policy provisions to the policyholder.56
My case had several of these elements.
The denial based on “wear and tear” was made without a proper engineering report, and the delays were clearly unreasonable.
My lawyer informed the insurance company that if they did not negotiate fairly, we were prepared to amend our lawsuit to include a claim for bad faith.
This is the ultimate checkmate move.
Why? Because if an insurer is found liable for bad faith, the consequences can be severe.
A court can order them to pay not only the full value of the original claim, but also:
- Consequential Damages: Costs you incurred because of the delay, like interest on loans you had to take out.
- Emotional Distress Damages: Compensation for the anxiety, stress, and mental anguish their conduct caused you.57
- Your Attorney’s Fees: The insurer can be forced to pay your legal bills.
- Punitive Damages: In egregious cases, courts can award additional damages designed specifically to punish the insurance company and deter them from harming other policyholders in the future.59
The threat of a bad faith claim gives your lawyer immense leverage.
It transforms the negotiation from being about a $30,000 roof to being about a potential six-figure judgment against the company.
It forces them to take you seriously.
Chapter 7: The Winning Negotiation and the Aftermath
With the detailed report from the public adjuster in hand and the credible threat of a bad faith lawsuit on the table, the insurance company’s tone changed completely.
Their lawyers contacted my lawyer.
The stonewalling ended.
A real negotiation began.
Within a few weeks, we reached a settlement.
The final amount was for $31,500—enough to cover the full replacement of my roof and siding with quality materials, minus my deductible.
My lawyer’s contingency fee was paid from that settlement, and I was still left with more than enough to make my home whole again.
The nightmare was over.
My story is not an exception; it is the norm for those who seek legal help.
The data is overwhelmingly clear.
A landmark study by the Insurance Research Council (IRC) found that personal injury victims who hired an attorney received settlements that were, on average, 3.5 times higher than those who went it alone.15
Another study found that 85% of all money paid out by insurers for bodily injury claims went to claimants represented by a lawyer.16
While these statistics are for personal injury, the underlying dynamic is identical for property claims: representation dramatically increases outcomes.
Consumer advocacy groups paint a grim picture for those who go it alone.
United Policyholders, a non-profit organization, has conducted numerous surveys of disaster survivors.
Their findings are staggering: after the 2020 California wildfires, 70% of homeowners reported problems with their insurer, including lowball offers and delays.62
In another survey, 69% of respondents reported delays, and 64% felt their insurer’s experts were biased.63
These are not isolated incidents; they are evidence of a systemic problem.
The industry’s “deny, delay, defend” strategy is a business model that profits from the predictable percentage of policyholders who will either give up or accept an unfair offer.
Hiring a lawyer is the most effective way to opt out of that model.
If you find yourself in this situation, there are steps you can take.
A good first move is to file a formal complaint with your state’s Department of Insurance.64
This creates an official record of your dispute and can sometimes prompt the insurer to reconsider.
But it is not a substitute for having a dedicated advocate on your side.
Conclusion: You Don’t Have to Negotiate the Treaty Alone
Looking back, the hailstorm was the easy part.
The real disaster was the fight that followed.
It was a fight that nearly cost me my savings and my sanity.
My biggest mistake was believing the promise on the brochure instead of reading the treaty I had signed.
I thought I had a partner, but what I really had was a powerful counterparty in a complex financial negotiation.
The insurance system is not inherently evil, but it is inherently adversarial.
It is a game of risk transfer, and when a claim is filed, the insurer’s goal is to minimize their financial exposure.
They have teams of experts, decades of data, and a carefully crafted playbook to achieve that goal.
For a homeowner to face that alone is to walk into a diplomatic summit unprepared and expect a fair outcome.
It simply will not happen.
My journey taught me that the only way to ensure fairness is to restore balance to the negotiation.
You do that by hiring your own expert, your own ambassador.
An insurance claims lawyer is more than just a litigator; they are your translator, your strategist, and your shield.
They level the playing field, not by being aggressive, but by being prepared.
They force the negotiation to be about the facts of the damage and the language of the policy, not about your ability to withstand pressure.
The relief I felt when I received that final settlement check was immense, but it wasn’t just about the money.
It was the feeling of vindication.
It was the restoration of control.
It was the peace of mind that comes from knowing you have a champion in your corner.
You pay your premiums for a promise of security.
When that promise is broken, you don’t have to fight alone.
You can, and you should, hire someone to make them keep it.
Works cited
- Understanding Trauma Following a Natural Disaster – Zencare blog, accessed August 12, 2025, https://blog.zencare.co/trauma-after-natural-disaster/
- Can I Sue My Insurance Company for Emotional Distress? | Wallace Law, accessed August 12, 2025, https://www.wallaceinsurancelaw.com/can-i-sue-my-insurance-company-for-emotional-distress/
- What does a Claim Attorney do? Career Overview, Roles, Jobs | Together SC, accessed August 12, 2025, https://jobs.togethersc.org/career/claim-attorney
- The Role of Insurance Lawyers in Claim Disputes – Simmons Law Group, accessed August 12, 2025, https://mylegalchampions.com/role-of-insurance-lawyers-claims/
- Insurance Lawyer: Who Are They? What Do They Do? – Contracts Counsel, accessed August 12, 2025, https://www.contractscounsel.com/b/insurance-lawyer
- Why Hire a Property Casualty Lawyer for a Home Insurance Claim?, accessed August 12, 2025, https://insuranceclaimhq.com/why-hire-a-property-casualty-lawyer-for-home-insurance-claims/
- Why Do I Need to Hire an Insurance Claims Lawyer? – LaMarca Law Group, accessed August 12, 2025, https://www.youriowalawyers.com/blog/2025/january/why-do-i-need-to-hire-an-insurance-claims-lawyer/
- Insurance Company Tactics: Claim Denial Tricks You Should Look Out For, accessed August 12, 2025, https://www.bellpollockinjury.com/insurance-company-tactics-claim-denial-tricks-you-should-look-out-for/
- 10 Tactics Insurance Companies Use to Deny and Devalue Claims – Dickerson Oxton, accessed August 12, 2025, https://www.dickersonoxton.com/resources/10-tactics-insurance-companies-use-to-deny-and-devalue-claims/
- How Do Florida Attorneys and Public Adjusters Work Together? – Williams Law, P.A., accessed August 12, 2025, https://www.williamspa.com/blog/attorneys-and-public-adjusters-work-together-to-benefit-homeowners-florida-insurance-claim-lawyers/
- Public Adjuster vs. Attorney for Insurance Claims, accessed August 12, 2025, https://www.insuranceclaimrecoverysupport.com/public-adjuster-or-plaintiff-insurance-attorney/
- Hiring A Lawyer vs. Employing a Public Adjuster For Insurance Claims, accessed August 12, 2025, https://www.fivestarclaimsadjusting.com/southflorida/blog/2022/hiring-a-lawyer-vs-employing-a-public-adjuster-for-insurance-claims.html
- Why Hire an Insurance Attorney? – Boggs Law Group, accessed August 12, 2025, https://boggslawgroup.com/why-hire-an-insurance-attorney/
- Contingency Fee | Las Vegas, NV Lawyer – Lasso Injury Law LLC, accessed August 12, 2025, https://www.lassoinjurylaw.com/contingency-fee
- Injury Victims Hiring an Attorney Recover 3.5x More Money – Daws Law Firm, accessed August 12, 2025, https://dawslawfirm.com/blog/2024/08/statistics-show-injury-victims-who-hire-an-attorney-recover-3-5x-more-money-and-heres-why/
- You Get 3 1/2 Times More Money In Settlement If You Hire Attorney, accessed August 12, 2025, https://www.terrybryant.com/more-money-settlement-when-hire-lawyer
- Research Indicates Hiring a Personal Injury Attorney Increases Settlement Amounts, accessed August 12, 2025, https://soloffandzervanos.com/research-indicates-hiring-a-personal-injury-attorney-increases-settlement-amounts/
- Study Confirms: Injury Victims With A Lawyer Get Settlements 3.5 Times Larger, accessed August 12, 2025, https://www.creeksidelegal.com/study-confirms-injury-victims-with-a-lawyer-get-settlements-3-5-times-larger/
- Storm Damage (Hail, Hurricane & Wind) Insurance Claims – Turnbull Law Firm, accessed August 12, 2025, https://www.turnbulllawfirm.com/storm-damage-insurance-claims/
- Storm Damage Lawsuit | 3/17/2025, accessed August 12, 2025, https://www.forthepeople.com/blog/storm-damage-lawsuit/
- A Comprehensive Guide to Navigating the Insurance Claim Process – Wallace Law, accessed August 12, 2025, https://www.wallaceinsurancelaw.com/a-comprehensive-guide-to-navigating-the-insurance-claim-process/
- Residential Property Claims Guide, accessed August 12, 2025, https://www.insurance.ca.gov/01-consumers/105-type/95-guides/03-res/res-prop-claim.cfm
- Claims Dispute Guide | Insurance Experts, accessed August 12, 2025, https://www.insuranceclaimrecoverysupport.com/claims-dispute/
- Wear and Tear Exclusions in Property Insurance Claim, accessed August 12, 2025, https://www.arizonainsurancelaw.com/blog/wear-and-tear-exclusions-in-property-insurance-claim/
- Wear and Tear Exclusions Worn and Torn – Insurance Journal, accessed August 12, 2025, https://www.insurancejournal.com/magazines/mag-features/2023/09/18/740231.htm
- Insurance Adjuster / Roofing Company Conflict : r/Roofing – Reddit, accessed August 12, 2025, https://www.reddit.com/r/Roofing/comments/1dwzpui/insurance_adjuster_roofing_company_conflict/
- State Farm Wins Alabama Worn Out Roof Damage Case: Lesson About Hail Damage Cases, Expert Testimony, and Investigation Standards, accessed August 12, 2025, https://www.propertyinsurancecoveragelaw.com/blog/state-farm-wins-alabama-worn-out-roof-damage-case-lesson-about-hail-damage-cases-expert-testimony-and-investigation-standards/
- Actual Cash Value vs. Replacement Cost Value – North Carolina Department of Insurance, accessed August 12, 2025, https://www.ncdoi.gov/consumers/homeowners-insurance/actual-cash-value-vs-replacement-cost-value
- Replacement Cost vs. Actual Cash Value – Progressive, accessed August 12, 2025, https://www.progressive.com/answers/replacement-cost-vs-actual-cash-value/
- Home policies: Replacement cost or actual cash value? – Texas Department of Insurance, accessed August 12, 2025, https://www.tdi.texas.gov/tips/home-insurance-policies-replacement-cost-or-actual-cash-value.html
- How to Know if an Insurance Company Wrongfully Denies or Underpays Your Homeowner’s Claim, accessed August 12, 2025, https://vancleavelaw.com/blog/how-to-know-if-an-insurance-company-wrongfully-denies-or-underpays-your-homeowners-claim/
- Recoverable Depreciation in Homeowners Insurance | Bankrate, accessed August 12, 2025, https://www.bankrate.com/insurance/homeowners-insurance/recoverable-depreciation/
- What Is Recoverable Depreciation in Insurance Law?, accessed August 12, 2025, https://www.propertyinsurancecoveragelaw.com/blog/recoverable-depreciation/
- What Are The Common Tactics Insurance Companies Use To Fight Injury Claims?, accessed August 12, 2025, https://www.malmlegal.com/blog/common-insurance-tactics-used-to-fight-claims/
- 10 Tricks an Insurance Company May Use to Unfairly Deny Your Claim, accessed August 12, 2025, https://www.dll-law.com/blog/tricks-insurance-companies-use-to-deny-claims.cfm
- Insurance Issues as Secondary Stressors Following Flooding in Rural Australia—A Mixed Methods Study, accessed August 12, 2025, https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9180721/
- Can I Sue My Insurance Company for Emotional Distress? Your Legal Guide – Wocl Leydon, accessed August 12, 2025, https://www.woclleydon.com/blog/can-i-sue-my-insurance-company-for-emotional-distress/
- 10 Worst Insurance Companies | Bachus & Schanker, accessed August 12, 2025, https://www.coloradolaw.net/insurance-industry-10-worst-deny-claims/
- Homeowners insurance terms made simple | American Family Insurance, accessed August 12, 2025, https://www.amfam.com/resources/articles/understanding-insurance/homeowners-insurance-terms
- How to Read an Insurance Policy | Nonprofit Risk Management Center, accessed August 12, 2025, https://nonprofitrisk.org/resources/how-to-read-an-insurance-policy/
- Common Methods Insurance Companies Use to Deny a Claim, accessed August 12, 2025, https://www.freedmanlaw.com/common-tactics-insurance-companies-use-to-deny-your-claim/
- Common Tactics Insurance Companies Use to Deny Claims – HHJ Trial Attorneys, accessed August 12, 2025, https://hhjtrialattorneys.com/tactics-insurance-companies-use-deny-claims/
- What Is an Insurance Attorney? | 3/17/2025, accessed August 12, 2025, https://www.forthepeople.com/blog/what-insurance-attorney/
- 5 Reasons to Hire Insurance Lawyers | Wegmann Law Firm, accessed August 12, 2025, https://www.wegmannlawfirm.com/5-reasons-to-hire-insurance-lawyers/
- What to Know About Matching Exclusions, accessed August 12, 2025, https://www.kkpfirm.com/what-to-know-about-matching-exclusions/
- What’s the Difference Between a Public Adjuster and a Lawyer?, accessed August 12, 2025, https://www.tigeradjusters.com/blog/whats-the-difference-between-a-public-adjuster-and-a-lawyer
- www.khflaw.com, accessed August 12, 2025, https://www.khflaw.com/insurance-bad-faith.html#:~:text=Insurance%20bad%20faith%20refers%20to,payment%20could%20constitute%20bad%20faith.
- What Does The Term “Bad Faith” Mean? – Gianelli & Morris, accessed August 12, 2025, https://www.gmlawyers.com/faq/what-does-the-term-bad-faith-mean/
- Defining Insurance Bad Faith in California: A Guide for Policyholders – Gianelli & Morris, accessed August 12, 2025, https://www.gmlawyers.com/defining-insurance-bad-faith-in-ca/
- 5 Examples of Insurance Bad Faith | Kagan Law PLLC, accessed August 12, 2025, https://www.kaganlawfl.com/5-examples-of-insurance-bad-faith/
- How to Prove That Your Homeowners Insurance Company Acted in Bad Faith, accessed August 12, 2025, https://www.vosslawfirm.com/blog/how-to-prove-bad-faith-in-texas-homeowner-claims.cfm
- Insurance Company Bad Faith Tactics and Examples – FindLaw, accessed August 12, 2025, https://www.findlaw.com/consumer/insurance/insurance-company-bad-faith-tactics-and-examples.html
- 3 common examples of bad faith insurance practices – Alpern Schubert, accessed August 12, 2025, https://www.alpernschubertlaw.com/blog/2024/02/3-common-examples-of-bad-faith-insurance-practices/
- Bad Faith Insurance Tactics, accessed August 12, 2025, https://mccormickmurphy.com/bad-faith/examples/
- 3 examples of bad faith insurance practices | King Law Firm, P.C., accessed August 12, 2025, https://www.davidkinglawfirm.com/blog/2024/07/3-examples-of-bad-faith-insurance-practices/
- The Elements of a Bad Faith Insurance Claim – Heninger Garrison Davis, accessed August 12, 2025, https://www.hgdlawfirm.com/blog/the-elements-of-a-bad-faith-insurance-claim/
- Insurance Bad Faith – Ruiz & Smart LLP, accessed August 12, 2025, https://ruizandsmart.com/insurance-bad-faith
- Bad Faith Lawsuits Against Insurance Companies: Key Legal Arguments – Forensis Group, accessed August 12, 2025, https://www.forensisgroup.com/resources/expert-legal-witness-blog/bad-faith-lawsuits-against-insurance-companies-key-legal-arguments
- The Legal Consequences for Insurance Companies That Act in Bad Faith, accessed August 12, 2025, https://www.gkt.com/legal-consequences-insurance-companies-act-bad-faith/
- Understanding Bad Faith Claims in Insurance Coverage Disputes, accessed August 12, 2025, https://www.lodhs.com/blog/understanding-bad-faith-claims-in-insurance-coverage-disputes/
- A Case of Insurance Misconduct Shows the Importance of Bad Faith Law, accessed August 12, 2025, https://thenationaltriallawyers.org/article/a-case-of-insurance-misconduct-shows-the-importance-of-bad-faith-law/
- Floods, Fires… and Home Insurance Claims – United Policyholders, accessed August 12, 2025, https://uphelp.org/floods-fires-and-home-insurance-claims/?print=print
- Open Surveys and Results – United Policyholders, accessed August 12, 2025, https://uphelp.org/media/surveys/
- File a Consumer Insurance Complaint – Georgia Office of Insurance and Safety Fire Commissioner, accessed August 12, 2025, https://oci.georgia.gov/file-consumer-insurance-complaint
- How to get help with a homeowners or renters insurance complaint, accessed August 12, 2025, https://www.tdi.texas.gov/consumer/homeowners-renters-insurance-complaint.html






