The Adjuster’s Game: How to Stop Being a Pawn and Start Winning Your Insurance Claim

Part I: My Costly Education – Entering the Arena Blind

Narrative Introduction: The Myth of “Good Hands”

The sound of twisting metal and shattering glass is something you never forget.

One moment, I was humming along to the radio on a crisp autumn afternoon; the next, I was staring at a spiderweb of cracks in my windshield, the world tilted at a nauseating angle.

My car, a reliable sedan I’d meticulously maintained, was a crumpled wreck.

But in the disorienting aftermath, a single thought brought a wave of relief: I have insurance.

I was with a major, reputable carrier, one whose commercials filled the airwaves with promises of being a “good neighbor,” of holding you in “good hands.” I paid my premiums on time, every time.

I was a good customer.

I believed they were my partner in this unforeseen crisis.

My first call with the claims adjuster, a man named Mark, did everything to reinforce this belief.

His voice was calm, empathetic, and reassuring.

He told me not to worry, that his job was to guide me through the process and make sure everything was taken care of.

He was, for all intents and purposes, the friendly face the commercials had promised.¹

I trusted him implicitly.

I saw him as my advocate, a guide who would help me navigate the complexities of the situation.

But as the days turned into weeks, a subtle shift occurred.

The warm, prompt callbacks became less frequent.

My simple questions about the process were met with vague, non-committal answers.

The straightforward path to recovery I had envisioned began to feel like a dense, bureaucratic fog.

What I thought would be a simple matter of assessing the damage and cutting a check transformed into a labyrinth of forms, requests for documentation I’d already sent, and long, unexplained silences.

This slow-drip of frustration is a near-universal experience for claimants, a deliberate feature of a system designed to wear you down.²

I felt it acutely, a growing sense of unease that the “good neighbor” was slowly locking his doors.

Anonymized stories from countless others echo this same journey from trust to disillusionment, a pattern so common it can only be by design.⁴

The Core Struggle: A Game I Didn’t Know I Was Playing

The friendly mask began to slip, revealing the calculated professional underneath.

Mark started asking questions that felt less like fact-finding and more like interrogations.

“You were in a bit of a hurry to get home, weren’t you?” he’d ask casually.

It was a classic blame-shifting tactic, an attempt to get me to admit even a sliver of fault that could reduce my settlement.¹

Then came the request for a recorded statement.

Mark framed it as a “routine formality” to “get my side of the story on record”.⁷

Naively, I agreed, not realizing I was walking into a carefully laid trap.

Every word would be scrutinized, every pause analyzed, every “I think” twisted into an admission of uncertainty.

This is a pivotal move for the adjuster, designed to lock in a narrative they can control and use against the claimant later.⁶

Soon after, the first offer arrived.

It was for my totaled car, and it came with a sense of urgency.

Mark presented it as a way to “get this part of it behind you quickly,” a swift resolution to ease my stress.⁷

The amount seemed plausible to my untrained eye, and the pressure of dealing with medical appointments, a rental car, and the sheer emotional exhaustion of the accident was immense.

This brings me to my key failure, the costly mistake that became the catalyst for my life’s work.

Worn down, trusting, and desperate for closure, I accepted Mark’s “final offer.” I signed the paperwork, relieved to have one less thing to worry about.

It was a profound mistake.

A few weeks later, after the dust had settled, I started doing the research I should have done from the beginning.

I looked up my car’s make, model, year, and condition in private party and dealer listings.

The truth hit me like a second collision: the settlement I had accepted was nearly 30% below my car’s actual fair market value.

Mark hadn’t been helping me; he had been playing me.

His objective was never fairness.

It was to save his company money, a fundamental goal of the insurance adjuster’s role.⁹

That day, I paid for my ignorance.

It was a costly but invaluable education in the true nature of the insurance claims process.

The Adjuster’s True Purpose

The initial friendliness displayed by an adjuster is not a reflection of their personality; it is a calculated strategic move.

In the vulnerable and stressful period following a loss, a claimant is psychologically primed to seek help and reassurance.⁶

They

want to believe the comforting marketing slogans and see the adjuster as an ally.

The adjuster’s empathetic initial persona confirms this bias, effectively lowering the claimant’s natural defenses.¹

Once this trust is established, the claimant becomes far more compliant with requests that are, in reality, detrimental to their own interests.

A request for a recorded statement or a broad medical authorization form seems like a reasonable step between partners, not a strategic maneuver by an adversary to gain an information advantage.⁶

This initial phase of building rapport is the critical first move in a sophisticated game, designed to extract concessions and information before the claimant even realizes the game has begun.

Part II: The Epiphany – It’s Not a Conversation, It’s a Game

The Turning Point: A New Lens from an Unlikely Source

My frustration with that first claim festered.

It wasn’t just about the money I’d lost; it was the feeling of being outmaneuvered, of being a pawn in a game whose rules I didn’t understand.

I became obsessed with understanding the dynamics of that interaction.

Why did it feel so scripted? Why were the adjuster’s actions so predictable in hindsight? My search for answers led me far from the world of insurance policies and into the realm of economics, psychology, and, eventually, a field I’d only vaguely heard of: Game Theory.¹⁰

The moment of epiphany came while reading a description of the Prisoner’s Dilemma.

The scenario, as described in countless textbooks and articles, was simple but profound.¹¹

Two partners in crime are arrested and held in separate rooms.

They cannot communicate.

The prosecutor offers each the same deal:

• If you betray your partner (defect) and they stay silent (cooperate), you go free, and they get a long sentence.
• If you both stay silent (cooperate), you both get a short sentence.
• If you both betray each other (defect), you both get a medium sentence.

The logical conclusion is chillingly rational.

From each prisoner’s individual perspective, betraying the other is always the best move, regardless of what the other does.

If the partner stays silent, betrayal leads to freedom (the best outcome).

If the partner betrays, betrayal leads to a medium sentence (better than the long sentence from staying silent).

The result is that both prisoners, acting in their own rational self-interest, betray each other and end up with a worse outcome than if they had both cooperated.¹¹

Reading this, a light went on.

This wasn’t just a hypothetical puzzle; it was a perfect model of my interaction with Mark, the adjuster.

We were the two players in separate rooms.

We would both be better off with a quick, fair, cooperative settlement.

But our incentives were misaligned.

The adjuster wasn’t being malicious or cruel; he was a rational player making the most logical move for his side of the board.

His “payoff” was minimizing the claim cost for his employer; my “payoff” was maximizing the settlement to cover my losses.⁹

Our interests were in direct, structural conflict.

This reframing was the epiphany.

My claim wasn’t a customer service interaction that had gone wrong.

It was a strategic game that I had lost because I didn’t even know I was playing.

The New Paradigm: The Insurance Claim as a Strategic Game

This new understanding gave me a powerful framework.

An insurance claim is not a collaborative process for recovery; it is a strategic game with clearly defined components:

• The Players: The Policyholder (you) and the Insurer (represented by the adjuster). Both are assumed to be rational actors striving to maximize their own payoffs.¹⁰
• The Payoffs: For you, the payoff is a settlement that makes you whole, covering all your economic and non-economic damages. For the insurer, the payoff is “claim closure at the lowest possible cost,” a concept known as “indemnity” from their perspective but pure loss minimization in practice.⁹
• The Strategies: These are the actions each player can take. The adjuster’s strategies are their “secret tactics”—the lowball offers, the delay games, the requests for recorded statements. Your strategies are the counter-moves, the playbook you are about to learn.
• The Information: The game is also one of “asymmetric information.” The adjuster knows the rules, the value of your claim, and the playbook. The unprepared claimant knows none of these things. Your goal is to eliminate this information gap.

The Prisoner’s Dilemma serves as the perfect analogy for the default state of this game.¹¹

If you, the claimant, naively “cooperate” with the adjuster—trusting them completely, giving them any information they ask for, accepting their valuation without question—while the adjuster “defects” by using that information against you and lowballing your claim, you will receive the worst possible outcome.

The adjuster, on the other hand, achieves their best outcome.

Because you cannot trust the adjuster to prioritize your interests over their company’s, the only rational starting position is one of strategic awareness and calculated play.

Viewing the process through this lens is transformative.

It depersonalizes the conflict, turning emotional frustration into cool, strategic analysis.

The anger and sense of betrayal that so many claimants feel are replaced by a clear-eyed understanding of the game’s mechanics.²

A lowball offer is no longer a personal insult; it’s a predictable opening move known as an “anchor”.¹⁵

A long delay is not just poor customer service; it is a “war of attrition” tactic designed to exhaust your resources and resolve.¹

This mental shift from seeing yourself as a victim of circumstance to a player in a strategic game is the single most powerful asset you can bring to your claim.

It allows you to stop reacting emotionally and start acting strategically, analyzing the “game state” and choosing the optimal counter-move.

Part III: Know Your Opponent – Deconstructing the Adjuster’s World

The Adjuster’s Official Role vs. Their Actual Objective

To win any game, you must first understand your opponent.

On the surface, the role of an insurance claims adjuster seems straightforward and even noble.

According to objective sources like the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, their duties involve evaluating insurance claims to determine whether the company must pay, and if so, how much.

They inspect property damage, interview claimants and witnesses, review police and medical reports, and negotiate settlements.⁹

They are the investigators and fact-finders of the insurance world, tasked with resolving a loss.¹⁷

This is the public-facing, “official” version of their job.

However, buried within this job description is a fundamental and unavoidable conflict of interest.

The adjuster works for the insurance company.

While they must operate within legal and ethical bounds, their primary objective is to serve the financial interests of their employer.

A key part of that role, as noted by the Bureau of Labor Statistics, is that “the goal of adjusters working for insurance companies is to save as much money for the company as possible”.⁹

Their mission is not to ensure you receive the maximum possible compensation under your policy; it is to close your claim for the minimum amount possible, a practice often referred to as “indemnity.” This places their core objective in direct opposition to yours.

You are not on the same team; you are on opposite sides of the negotiating table.

The Metrics That Matter: How Adjusters Are Judged and Rewarded

This conflict of interest is not just a philosophical concept; it is codified in the way adjusters are managed and evaluated.

They do not operate in a vacuum of pure professional judgment.

Their performance is rigorously tracked using Key Performance Indicators (KPIs) that directly shape their behavior and incentivize the very tactics that are so frustrating to claimants.¹⁸

Understanding these metrics is like finding the opponent’s playbook.

The most critical KPIs for a claims adjuster typically include:

1. Speed (or Cycle Time): This metric tracks the average time it takes for an adjuster to close a claim file, from the first notice of loss to the final payment.¹⁸ A lower cycle time is better. This creates immense pressure on the adjuster to resolve claims quickly, which directly incentivizes the “quick-settle” tactic. A fast, lowball offer that an unprepared claimant accepts is a win for the adjuster’s speed metric.⁷
2. Productivity (or Claim Volume): Adjusters are often evaluated on how many claims they can manage and close within a given period.¹⁸ This means they are incentivized to spend as little time as possible on any individual claim. A deep, thorough investigation that might uncover the full extent of your damages is time-consuming and works directly against this productivity metric. It is far more efficient for them to rely on a quick estimate and a swift, low offer.
3. Accuracy (or Loss Ratio / Severity): This is the most crucial metric of all. It measures the amount of money paid out on claims (the “loss”) against the premiums collected.²⁰ For an insurer’s profitability, a lower loss ratio is paramount. For an adjuster, “accuracy” often translates to keeping claim payouts, or “severity,” as low as possible. Every dollar they
   don’t pay you directly improves this core metric, which can impact their performance reviews, bonuses, and career advancement.¹³

These performance metrics create a system where the adjuster’s professional success is often inversely proportional to your financial recovery.

The tactics that claimants find so infuriating—the delays, the lowball offers, the pressure to settle—are not the actions of rogue employees.

They are the logical, predictable outputs of a system designed to prioritize speed and cost containment above all else.

A “fair and thorough” investigation from the claimant’s perspective is an inefficient and costly process from the adjuster’s KPI-driven perspective.

It takes more time, hurting their speed metric, and almost always results in a higher payout, hurting their severity metric.

Therefore, tactics that short-circuit this process are not just tricks; they are the most effective strategies for an adjuster to succeed within the system that employs them.

Part IV: The Adjuster’s Playbook – A Tactical Field Manual

Introduction: Recognizing the Plays

Once you understand that the adjuster is a strategic opponent driven by performance metrics, their actions stop being random and start looking like plays from a well-rehearsed playbook.

These tactics are used over and over again for a simple reason: they are psychologically effective against individuals who are stressed, uninformed, and unprepared.⁷

Recognizing the play as it happens is the first and most crucial step to mounting an effective defense.

What follows is a field manual to that playbook.

The Playbook

Play 1: The Opening Gambit (Anchoring and Intimidation)

The first moves in the game are designed to seize psychological control and set the terms of the negotiation in the insurer’s favor.

• The Lowball Offer: Almost without exception, the first settlement offer you receive will be low, sometimes shockingly so.⁸ This is not a starting point for a fair negotiation; it is a powerful psychological tactic known as
  anchoring.¹⁵ The first number put on the table has a disproportionate effect on the rest of the negotiation. By starting with a very low anchor, the adjuster makes all subsequent offers—even if they are still far below the true value of your claim—seem reasonable by comparison.²³ They are banking on your lack of knowledge about your claim’s real worth, hoping to exploit that information gap.²¹
• The Quick-Settle Trap: This tactic is often paired with the lowball offer. The adjuster will create a sense of urgency, framing the offer as a one-time opportunity to get cash in your hand quickly and “put this whole ordeal behind you”.⁶ They prey on the very real financial and emotional stress you are under, knowing that the temptation to resolve the matter swiftly can be overwhelming.⁸ Accepting this offer is almost always a mistake, as you may not yet know the full extent of your injuries or damages, and once you sign the release, you can never go back for more.⁷

Play 2: Information Warfare (Controlling the Narrative)

The value of your claim is determined by information.

The adjuster’s goal is to control that information—to get as much from you as possible while giving you as little as possible.

• The Recorded Statement: The adjuster will present the request for a recorded statement as a routine, non-negotiable part of the process.⁷ It is not. The true purpose is to get you on record, often before you’ve had time to process the event or consult with an attorney. They are trained to ask leading questions designed to elicit responses that can be twisted to suggest you admitted fault, downplayed your injuries, or contradicted yourself.⁶ Declining to provide a recorded statement to the other party’s insurer is a critical defensive move.²⁵
• The Overly Broad Medical Authorization: The adjuster will send you a medical release form, asking for your signature to obtain your medical records. The form they send is often a blanket authorization, giving them access to your entire medical history, from childhood to the present day.⁷ Their goal is to go on a fishing expedition, searching for any pre-existing condition or prior injury they can use to argue that your current pain is not solely the result of the recent incident, thereby justifying a lower payout or an outright denial.¹

Play 3: The War of Attrition (Weaponizing Frustration)

If you don’t fall for the quick-settle trap, the adjuster may shift to a strategy of attrition, designed to exhaust your patience and your resources.

• Strategic Delays: This is one of the most common and frustrating tactics. The adjuster suddenly becomes difficult to reach. Phone calls go to voicemail and are not returned for days or weeks. Emails go unanswered. They may repeatedly ask for documents you have already sent.¹ This is not just poor customer service; it is a deliberate strategy. The insurer knows that claimants are often under financial pressure from medical bills and lost income. By dragging out the process, they aim to increase your desperation until you are willing to accept any offer, no matter how low, just to make it stop.²

Play 4: Psychological Operations (Gaslighting and Misdirection)

This set of tactics is designed to make you doubt yourself, your case, and your understanding of the policy you paid for.

• Shifting Blame (Comparative Negligence): The adjuster will subtly try to shift a portion of the fault for the incident onto you. They will ask questions like, “Were you distracted for even a second?” or “You were going a little over the speed limit, weren’t you?”.⁶ They know that in many jurisdictions, the legal doctrine of comparative or contributory negligence can reduce your settlement by the percentage of your fault. If they can get you to accept 50% or more of the blame, it can bar you from recovering anything at all.¹
• Downplaying Damages & Misrepresenting Coverage: Even with clear documentation from your doctor, the adjuster may argue that your injuries are not as severe as you claim or that your medical treatment was excessive.⁸ They might also tell you that a certain type of damage is “not covered” under your policy, hoping that you won’t take the time to read the complex policy language yourself.⁸ In the most egregious cases, this can be part of a systematic, fraudulent scheme, with internal reports being altered to minimize payouts, as whistleblowers have revealed.²⁷

Play 5: Covert Operations (Surveillance)

For claims involving significant personal injury, the insurer may escalate to active surveillance.

• The Investigator: It is not uncommon for an insurance company to hire a private investigator to monitor you. They may follow you, take photos or videos of you in public, and meticulously comb through your social media profiles.¹ They are looking for a single piece of evidence—a photo of you carrying groceries, a post about going for a walk, a video of you playing with your children—that they can present as “proof” that you are exaggerating or faking your injuries. The goal is to destroy your credibility and give them leverage to deny or drastically reduce your claim.⁷

These plays are not used in isolation.

They form a coherent, integrated system designed to achieve a single goal: minimizing the amount of money the insurance company pays you.

By controlling information, manipulating your psychological state, and systematically devaluing every component of your claim, the adjuster works to dismantle your case piece by piece.

But every play has a counter-play.

Part V: Your Counter-Playbook – How to Turn the Tables

Introduction: Seizing Control of the Game

Knowledge of the adjuster’s playbook is your shield.

This section provides you with the sword.

The following counter-strategies are designed to neutralize the adjuster’s tactics, reverse the information asymmetry, and shift the psychological pressure back onto the insurer.

The goal is not to be aggressive or unreasonable, but to be professional, prepared, and strategic.

By executing these counter-plays, you cease to be a passive participant and become an active player who controls the game.

The Counter-Playbook

Countering the Opening Gambit

• Reject the Anchor and Control the Timeline: When the adjuster presents their initial lowball offer, your response must be calm, polite, and firm. Do not get angry or engage in a debate about the number. Simply neutralize their move.

• Your Script: “Thank you for providing that initial figure. However, I am still in the process of completing my medical treatment and assessing the full extent of my damages. Therefore, I will not be considering any settlement offers at this time. I will let you know when I am ready to present my claim in full.”
• This response achieves two critical goals. First, it refuses to legitimize their low anchor, preventing it from framing the negotiation.⁷ Second, it puts you in control of the timeline, signaling that you will not be rushed into a premature settlement.²³
• Set Your Own Anchor: The Power of the Demand Letter: This is your single most powerful offensive move. Instead of reacting to the adjuster’s numbers, you will proactively establish the value of your claim with a comprehensive demand letter.³⁰ This professional document should be sent only when you have completed medical treatment or have a clear prognosis. It must include:

1. A clear, factual narrative of the incident, establishing liability.
2. A detailed list of all medical treatments received, with copies of all bills.
3. Documentation of all lost wages, supported by a letter from your employer.
4. A calculated amount for pain and suffering. A common (though not universally applicable) starting point is to multiply your total economic damages (medical bills + lost wages) by a factor of 1.5 to 5, depending on the severity and permanence of your injuries.³¹
5. Copies of all supporting evidence: photos, police reports, witness statements, etc.
6. A specific total monetary demand. This number should be your “anchor”—a well-supported figure that is higher than your absolute minimum acceptable settlement, leaving you room to negotiate downward without giving up too much.²⁶
   
   By presenting a meticulously documented and professionally formatted demand, you seize control of the negotiation and force the adjuster to react to your anchor.

Winning the Information War

• Never Give a Recorded Statement: When the adjuster asks for a recorded statement, your refusal must be polite but absolute.

• Your Script: “To ensure complete accuracy and avoid any misinterpretation, I will not be providing a recorded statement. I am, however, happy to provide any necessary information in writing.”
• This is non-negotiable. Providing information in writing allows you to carefully craft your responses, stick to the facts, and create a clear paper trail, completely neutralizing their ability to trip you up with leading questions.⁶
• Provide a Limited Medical Authorization: Never sign the insurer’s standard, blank-check authorization form. You control access to your private medical history.

• Your Action: You or your attorney should draft a specific, limited authorization that grants the insurer access only to the records from the specific dates and providers related to the injuries from the incident in question.
• Your Script: “I will not be signing a general medical release. I will provide you with a limited authorization for the specific records that are relevant to this claim.”
• This prevents the adjuster’s fishing expedition and protects your privacy while still complying with your duty to provide relevant information.⁷

Winning the War of Attrition

• Patience is Your Superpower: Recognize that delays are a tactic designed to frustrate you. Do not let them succeed. Use the extra time to your advantage—gather more documentation, research jury verdicts for similar injuries in your area, and further strengthen your demand letter.²² Patience signals to the adjuster that their attrition strategy will not work on you.
• Create a Meticulous Paper Trail: Document every single interaction. After every phone call with the adjuster, immediately send a polite follow-up email.

• Your Script (Email Follow-Up): “Dear [Adjuster’s Name], This email is to confirm our telephone conversation today,, at. We discussed, and you stated that you would [Action Item]. Please let me know if my understanding is incorrect. Thank you.”
• This simple practice creates an undeniable record of the negotiation, prevents the adjuster from denying what was said, and applies a subtle but firm professional pressure. It builds your file for a potential bad faith claim if the delays become unreasonable.²⁴

Winning the Psychological Battle

• Stick to the Facts: When the adjuster attempts to shift blame or get you to speculate, do not take the bait. Your responses should be brief, factual, and non-emotional.

• Your Script: “I am not going to speculate on that. The facts of the incident are detailed in the official police report.” Or, “My medical providers have documented the extent of my injuries, and that information is included in my claim submission.”
• This disciplined communication prevents you from accidentally admitting partial fault or saying something that could be used to downplay your injuries.⁶
• Know Your Policy: The ultimate counter to an adjuster misrepresenting your coverage is to know what your policy actually says. Take the time to read it. If an adjuster denies a part of your claim, demand they justify it in writing.

• Your Script: “Could you please send me a letter that cites the specific exclusion language in my policy, by page and section number, that you are relying on to deny this portion of the claim?”
• This move often stops the misrepresentation in its tracks, as adjusters are reluctant to put an incorrect policy interpretation in writing.⁸

Countering Covert Ops

• Go Dark on Social Media: This is a simple but critical defense. From the moment of the incident until your claim is settled, assume you are being watched.
• Your Action: Set all of your social media profiles to their most private settings. Do not accept friend requests from anyone you don’t know. Most importantly, do not post anything about your accident, your injuries, your recovery, or your physical activities. Even an innocent photo of you smiling at a family barbecue can be twisted by an insurer.¹ Silence is your best defense.

By systematically applying these counter-moves, you transform the game.

You take control of the information, the timeline, and the psychological frame of the negotiation.

Summary Table: Adjuster Tactic & Policyholder Counter-Move

To navigate the high-stress environment of a claim, a clear, actionable summary is essential.

This table condenses the core strategic advice of this report, directly linking the adjuster’s play to your most effective counter-play.

It serves as a quick-reference field guide for the game.

Adjuster’s Tactic	Strategic Goal	Your Counter-Move
The Quick, Lowball Offer	Anchor the negotiation low; prey on your financial stress.	Politely decline. State you are still assessing the full extent of your damages. Never accept the first offer.
Request for Recorded Statement	Elicit admissions or inconsistencies to use against you.	Politely decline. State you will provide all necessary information in writing. Control the information flow.
Overly Broad Medical Release	Find pre-existing conditions to deny or reduce the claim.	Refuse to sign. Provide only the specific medical records related to the accident injuries.
Strategic Delays	Wear you down and increase pressure to accept a low offer.	Document every interaction. Send polite, persistent follow-up emails creating a paper trail. Use the time to build your case.
Blame-Shifting Questions	Get you to admit partial fault to reduce the payout.	Stick to the facts. Do not speculate or apologize. State, “The police report accurately describes the incident.”
Misrepresenting Policy Coverage	Intimidate you into dropping parts of your claim.	Ask the adjuster to cite the specific exclusion language in your written policy. Read your policy.
Surveillance / Social Media Monitoring	Find evidence to argue you are exaggerating your injuries.	Assume you are being watched. Set social media to private and be mindful of your public activities.

Part VI: Advanced Strategy – Changing the Nature of the Game

Beyond the Prisoner’s Dilemma: The Stag Hunt

The Prisoner’s Dilemma is an excellent model for the default state of an insurance claim, where mutual distrust leads to a suboptimal, adversarial outcome.

However, the most sophisticated negotiators don’t just play the game they’re given; they change the game itself.

To do this, we can turn to a more nuanced game theory model: the Stag Hunt.¹⁴

The Stag Hunt scenario involves two hunters.

They can choose to cooperate to hunt a stag—a large animal that provides a huge reward but requires both hunters to succeed.

Alternatively, either hunter can choose to act alone and hunt a hare—a much smaller reward, but one that is guaranteed and doesn’t require cooperation.

The dilemma is this: cooperation yields the best possible outcome (a shared stag), but it requires trusting your partner.

If you commit to hunting the stag and your partner defects to hunt a hare, you get nothing.

In an insurance claim, the “stag” is a quick, efficient, and fair settlement.

It’s the best outcome for both parties: you get the compensation you deserve without a protracted fight, and the insurer closes the file quickly and without incurring the high costs of litigation, which benefits their KPIs.¹⁸

The “hare” is the long, drawn-out battle of attrition—a lowball settlement for you, and a time-consuming, expensive file for the adjuster.

You can change the game from a Prisoner’s Dilemma to a Stag Hunt by signaling to the adjuster that you are a credible and prepared partner for “hunting the stag.” You do this by executing the counter-playbook from Part V.

When you submit a professional, meticulously documented demand letter, you are signaling that you are not an easy target who can be picked off with a lowball offer.

You are demonstrating that the path of non-cooperation (the “hare”) will be long, difficult, and costly for the adjuster.

This fundamentally alters their strategic calculation.

Suddenly, cooperating with you to achieve a quick, fair settlement (the “stag”) becomes their most rational, cost-effective move.

The Ethical Rulebook: Calling Fouls

Most claimants are unaware that adjusters operate under a strict set of legal and ethical rules.

These rules, established by state departments of insurance and industry organizations like the National Association of Public Insurance Adjusters (NAPIA), are the official “rules of the game”.³⁵

Knowing these rules gives you the power to call a foul.

Key rules that are frequently relevant include:

• Duty of Good Faith and Fair Dealing: Adjusters must put the fair and honest treatment of the claimant above their own interests.³⁷
• No Advising Against Counsel: An adjuster is ethically barred from advising a claimant to refrain from seeking legal advice.³⁷
• Promptness and Diligence: Adjusters must act with “dispatch and due diligence” in handling a claim.³⁹ Unreasonable delays can be a violation of this duty.
• Written Explanations: Adjusters must provide claimants with a written estimate of the loss and must be able to provide a written explanation for their settlement valuations.³⁸

You can use these rules as a powerful lever.

If an adjuster is engaging in unreasonable delays or refuses to justify a low offer, you can politely reference the rules in your written communication.

For example: “Pursuant to the Unfair Claims Settlement Practices Act in my state, I am requesting a written response detailing the status of my claim within the next 15 days.” This signals that you know the rules of the game and are prepared to escalate the matter if they are not followed.

It introduces the implied threat of filing a formal complaint with the state insurance board or pursuing a “bad faith” claim, which is a significant deterrent for the insurer.

The existence of internal memos, like one from TSI Adjusters that explicitly ordered adjusters to withhold estimates from policyholders, shows that these rules are sometimes intentionally broken under pressure from the firm, making it even more important for claimants to know their rights.⁴⁰

The “Nuclear Option”: Bringing in a Professional Player

There are times when, despite your best efforts, the insurer refuses to negotiate fairly.

In this scenario, your ultimate strategic move is to escalate the game by hiring a professional player: a personal injury or insurance attorney.

This is not an admission of defeat; it is the most powerful move you can make.¹

Hiring an attorney fundamentally changes the adjuster’s strategic calculations in several ways:

1. It Levels the Playing Field: The adjuster is no longer playing against an amateur. They are now facing a professional who knows the playbook, the case law, the true value of the claim, and all the procedural rules.¹³
2. It Makes the Threat of Litigation Real: For an unrepresented claimant, the threat of a lawsuit is usually empty. For an insurer, the cost of litigation is a major factor in their analysis. Once an attorney is involved, the risk of a costly lawsuit becomes credible, forcing the insurer to seriously re-evaluate the cost-benefit of their lowball strategy.²¹
3. It Improves Outcomes: The data is clear. Studies and industry insiders confirm that claimants who are represented by legal counsel receive significantly higher settlements—often multiple times higher—than those who are not.²¹ The insurer’s own calculus changes because they know they can no longer rely on tactics that exploit a knowledge gap.

By demonstrating competence and preparation, you can shift the adjuster’s incentives, making a fair settlement their most logical choice.

You change the game from one where their best move is to betray you, to one where their best move is to cooperate.

Part VII: Victory – From Victim to Player

The Narrative Resolution: The Game Won

Years after my humbling experience with the car accident, I faced another unexpected loss.

A pipe burst behind a wall in my home, leading to extensive and partially hidden water damage.

The initial call with the new adjuster felt eerily familiar—the same empathetic tone, the same reassurances.

But this time, I wasn’t a naive victim; I was a prepared player.

Instead of waiting for their assessment, I immediately hired a reputable public adjuster and an independent contractor to provide detailed, line-item estimates for the repair, including the cost of mold remediation.

Before the insurance company’s adjuster had even finalized his report, I submitted my formal claim as a comprehensive demand package, complete with my independent estimates, photos, and a copy of the relevant sections of my homeowner’s policy.

This was my opening move, my anchor.

When the adjuster called to discuss the claim, he tried to deny coverage for the mold, claiming it was a separate issue.

I politely referred him to the “ensuing loss” clause in my policy—language I had already highlighted—and pointed to case law in my state that supported my position, a tactic similar to those used in successful negotiations where policy language is key.³⁴

When he requested a recorded statement about the “maintenance of my home,” I politely declined, stating that all necessary facts were in the claim documents I had provided.

The negotiation was brief.

Faced with a well-documented, professionally presented claim from a policyholder who clearly understood the policy and the process, the adjuster’s playbook became useless.

There were no delay tactics, no lowball offers.

He quickly conceded the mold coverage, and his company issued a check for a settlement that was within 5% of my initial demand—and more than double the informal verbal estimate he had floated during his initial inspection.

I had successfully applied the game theory framework.

By controlling the information, setting the anchor, and demonstrating professional competence, I had made a fair settlement the most efficient and logical outcome for the insurer.

My transformation from pawn to player was complete.

Final Message: You Have the Playbook

The insurance claim process is designed to be intimidating.

It thrives on an imbalance of power and information, leaving the average person feeling overwhelmed and helpless.

But it is not an indecipherable mystery.

It is a game.

It has rules, predictable strategies, and clear objectives.

The frustration and anxiety you may feel are not a personal failing; they are the intended result of a system built to wear you down.

But you are no longer an unsuspecting participant.

You understand that the adjuster is not your partner, but a rational opponent.

You know their performance is driven by metrics that put them in direct conflict with your goals.

You have their playbook, and more importantly, you have your counter-playbook.

The goal is not to become a hostile adversary, but to transform yourself into a prepared, professional, and strategic player.

By documenting everything, controlling the flow of information, knowing your rights, and never being afraid to escalate the game, you can level the playing field.

You have the power to shift the dynamic from one where you are acted upon to one where you act with purpose.

You now have the knowledge and the tools to navigate this complex process, stand up for your rights, and secure the full and fair outcome that you paid for and unequivocally deserve.

The game is afoot, and now, you know how to play.

Works cited

1. Top Insurance Adjuster Tricks Used To Deny Your Claim – The Babcock Law Firm, accessed August 12, 2025, https://www.injurylawcolorado.com/car-accident-attorney/insurance-adjuster-tricks/
2. Understanding the Challenges You May Face with Your Insurance …, accessed August 12, 2025, https://www.fivestarclaimsadjusting.com/centralflorida/blog/2023/understanding-the-challenges-you-may-face-with-your-insurance-company.html
3. 5 Ways Insurance Companies Can Wrong Their Clients – DL Law Group, accessed August 12, 2025, https://www.dllawgroup.com/2019/october/5-ways-insurance-companies-can-wrong-their-clients
4. My $30000 health insurance claim was denied. Then I tweeted about it – The Guardian, accessed August 12, 2025, https://www.theguardian.com/wellness/2025/feb/26/health-insurance-claims-social-media
5. Client Stories Of Their Insurer’s Bad Faith Tactics | Doug Terry Law, accessed August 12, 2025, https://www.dougterrylaw.com/client-stories/
6. Common Tactics Used by Insurance Adjusters to Try to Devalue Your Claim, accessed August 12, 2025, https://boyceholleman.com/common-tactics-used-by-insurance-adjusters-to-try-to-davalue-your-claim/
7. Shady Tricks Adjusters Use to Reduce Your Claim – The Champion …, accessed August 12, 2025, https://www.thechampionfirm.com/blog/tricks-insurance-adjusters-use-to-reduce-your-claim/
8. Top Home Insurance Claim Adjuster Secret Tactics You Need to Know – Storm Law Partners, accessed August 12, 2025, https://stormlawpartners.com/blog/top-home-insurance-claim-adjuster-secret-tactics-you-need-to-know/
9. Claims Adjusters, Appraisers, Examiners, and Investigators – Bureau of Labor Statistics, accessed August 12, 2025, https://www.bls.gov/ooh/business-and-financial/claims-adjusters-appraisers-examiners-and-investigators.htm
10. Ultimate Guide to Game Theory: Principles and Applications – Investopedia, accessed August 12, 2025, https://www.investopedia.com/terms/g/gametheory.asp
11. What Is the Prisoner’s Dilemma and How Does It Work? – Investopedia, accessed August 12, 2025, https://www.investopedia.com/terms/p/prisoners-dilemma.asp
12. ELI5: What is game theory, how is it used in negotiations and what is the problem prisoner dilemma. : r/explainlikeimfive – Reddit, accessed August 12, 2025, https://www.reddit.com/r/explainlikeimfive/comments/1irg3xp/eli5_what_is_game_theory_how_is_it_used_in/
13. HOW WE BEAT INSURANCE COMPANIES AT THEIR OWN GAME – Heinrich Law, accessed August 12, 2025, https://www.heinrichlaw.net/wp-content/uploads/2021/03/Heinrich-Law_White-Paper_v2.pdf
14. Applying Game Theory in Negotiation | Scotwork Global, accessed August 12, 2025, https://www.scotwork.com/negotiation-insights/applying-game-theory-in-negotiation/
15. Anchoring Effect in Psychology and Negotiation – Your Guide, accessed August 12, 2025, https://cpollardlaw.com/anchoring-effect-psychology-negotiation/
16. Working with an insurance adjuster – Texas Department of Insurance, accessed August 12, 2025, https://www.tdi.texas.gov/tips/working-with-adjuster.html
17. Claims Adjusting | EBSCO Research Starters, accessed August 12, 2025, https://www.ebsco.com/research-starters/business-and-management/claims-adjusting
18. Claims Adjuster Performance Metrics and Benchmarks Workflow – Mobile2b, accessed August 12, 2025, https://www.mobile2b.com/workflow-templates/insurance/claims-adjuster-performance-metrics-and-benchmarks
19. Claims Performance – KPI Calculator – Five Sigma, accessed August 12, 2025, https://fivesigmalabs.com/claims-performance-calculator/
20. Insurance Agency Performance Metrics: What Is Normal & Natural?, accessed August 12, 2025, https://www.agencyperformancepartners.com/blog/insurance-agency-performance-metrics-what-is-normal-natural/
21. Negotiation Power Imbalance: Why Insurance Companies Don’t Take Unrepresented Claimants Seriously – Weinstein Legal Team, accessed August 12, 2025, https://www.thelawofwe.com/insurance-negotiation-power-imbalance/
22. How to Master Insurance Settlement Negotiation in 5 Steps, accessed August 12, 2025, https://www.insuranceclaimrecoverysupport.com/insurance-settlement-negotiation/
23. 8 Insurance Settlement Negotiation Tips – Tittle & Perlmuter, accessed August 12, 2025, https://tittlelawfirm.com/8-insurance-settlement-negotiation-tips/
24. Top Tactics Insurance Companies Use to Undermine Your Claim – Car Accident Attorney, accessed August 12, 2025, https://www.hoffmannpersonalinjury.com/top-tactics-insurance-companies-use-to-undermine-your-claim/
25. How the Insurance Adjuster Determines an Injury Settlement Offer – AllLaw, accessed August 12, 2025, https://www.alllaw.com/articles/nolo/personal-injury/how-insurance-adjuster-determines-settlement-offer.html
26. How To Negotiate a Settlement With an Insurance Claims Adjuster, accessed August 12, 2025, https://www.dbdlawfirm.com/2023/02/how-to-negotiate-a-settlement-with-an-insurance-claims-adjuster/
27. 60 Minutes Special: Whistleblower reports Systematic Fraud by Insurance Companies in Claims Handling – Pittman Law Firm, P.L., accessed August 12, 2025, https://www.dontgethittwice.com/blog/2024/september/60-minutes-special-whistleblowers-reveal-systema/
28. 60 Minute Story Reveals Cases of Insurance Fraud by Insurance Companies, accessed August 12, 2025, https://www.azinjurylaw.com/60-minute-story-reveals-cases-of-insurance-fraud-by-insurance-companies
29. Common Insurance Company Tactics In Accident Claims, accessed August 12, 2025, https://1800lionlaw.com/insurance-company-tactics-in-accident-claims/
30. How to Negotiate with Insurance Adjusters Like a Pro | Wetherington …, accessed August 12, 2025, https://wfirm.com/how-to-negotiate-with-insurance-adjusters-like-a-pro/
31. How I negotiated a settlement without a lawyer. : r/Insurance – Reddit, accessed August 12, 2025, https://www.reddit.com/r/Insurance/comments/mwgrbg/how_i_negotiated_a_settlement_without_a_lawyer/
32. Tips for Negotiating an Injury Settlement With an Insurance Company – Nolo, accessed August 12, 2025, https://www.nolo.com/legal-encyclopedia/negotiating-with-insurance-company-29765.html
33. Winning the Negotiation Game: How to Handle Insurance Adjusters in Personal Injury Cases – Moton Legal Group, accessed August 12, 2025, https://motonlegalgroup.com/how-to-negotiate-with-insurance-adjuster-personal-injury/
34. What is your story of rejection of an insurance claim and having fought to get it? This question is to educate users about the tricks by insurance companies and tips for better claim experience. – Quora, accessed August 12, 2025, https://www.quora.com/What-is-your-story-of-rejection-of-an-insurance-claim-and-having-fought-to-get-it-This-question-is-to-educate-users-about-the-tricks-by-insurance-companies-and-tips-for-better-claim-experience
35. Code of Conduct – National Association of Public Insurance Adjusters, accessed August 12, 2025, https://www.napia.com/code-of-conduct
36. ️Risk Management and Insurance Unit 11 – Legal and Ethical Issues in Insurance, accessed August 12, 2025, https://library.fiveable.me/risk-management-insurance/unit-11
37. Florida Public Adjuster Ethics, accessed August 12, 2025, https://www.aafpaa.com/insurance-adjusters/public-adjuster/ethics
38. Claim Handling Code of Ethics – Florida Department of Financial Services, accessed August 12, 2025, https://www.myfloridacfo.com/docs-sf/consumer-services-libraries/consumerservices-documents/understanding-coverage/adjustercodeofethics.pdf?sfvrsn=f4a91f7a_6
39. Public Adjuster Code of Ethics and Contract Checklist – Florida Department of Financial Services, accessed August 12, 2025, https://www.myfloridacfo.com/docs-sf/consumer-services-libraries/consumerservices-documents/understanding-coverage/pacodeofethicscontractchecklist.pdf?sfvrsn=81e205a3_8
40. Florida Claims Adjuster Ethics – Property Insurance Coverage Law Blog, accessed August 12, 2025, https://www.propertyinsurancecoveragelaw.com/blog/florida-claims-adjuster-ethics/