The Descent: A Couple’s Guide to Navigating the Treacherous Terrain of Retirement

Section 1: The Tyranny of the Magic Number: The Flawed Map That Nearly Wrecked Our Retirement

My partner and I had a number.

For years, that number was our North Star.

It was the summit of our financial lives, the culmination of three decades of diligent saving, disciplined investing, and deferred gratification.

We did everything “right.” We maxed out our 401(k)s, capturing every dollar of employer match.¹

We opened and funded IRAs.

We used the online calculators, plugging in our salaries, savings rates, and projected expenses.

They all spit out variations of the same answer, a figure that felt immense, solid, and safe.

Our number was based on the most common rule of thumb: save 10 to 12 times your final income.²

We even built in a cushion.

As we approached our early sixties, we hit our number.

A quiet sense of triumph settled over us.

We had made it.

The map we had followed, the one handed down by conventional financial wisdom, had led us to the promised land.

Our plan was simple and, we thought, foolproof.

We would retire, and using the sacred 4% rule, draw down a comfortable income from our nest egg for the rest of our lives.⁴

We felt secure.

Then, less than a year before our planned retirement date, the market turned.

It wasn’t a gentle correction; it was a swift, brutal downturn that felt like the ground giving way beneath our feet.

We watched, paralyzed, as a significant chunk of our life’s savings—the very number that was supposed to be our fortress—evaporated in a matter of months.

The confidence we had built over thirty years shattered.

Our “safe” 4% withdrawal rate, once a mathematical certainty, now felt like a terrifying gamble.

Taking out that first year’s income would mean selling our investments at a deep loss, permanently crippling our portfolio’s ability to recover.

That painful experience was our catalyst.

It forced us to confront a terrifying truth: the map we had been following was not just flawed; it was dangerous.

It had led us to the summit, but it offered no instructions for the most critical part of the journey—getting back down.

We had been so focused on accumulating our “magic number” that we had never truly planned for the complex, treacherous reality of spending it.

This realization sent us on a new journey, one that began with dismantling the very rules that had once given us so much comfort.⁶

The Problem: Deconstructing the Alluring but Dangerous “Rules of Thumb”

The financial world loves simple rules.

They are easy to remember, easy to market, and provide a comforting sense of certainty in a world of variables.

But we learned the hard way that for a decision as complex as a couple’s retirement, these rules are blunt instruments that can cause profound damage.

They create a “brittle confidence” that shatters at the first sign of real-world stress.

The core psychological flaw of this conventional advice is that it conflates a target with a plan.

Hitting your number is the target, but it tells you nothing about how to navigate the next 30 years of market volatility, inflation, and life’s curveballs.

The plan is missing.

The Income Multiple Myth (10x-12x Salary)

The most common starting point for retirement planning is the income multiple rule, which suggests saving a multiple of your annual salary by a certain age.

Fidelity’s popular guidelines, for example, recommend aiming for 1x your salary by age 30, 3x by 40, 6x by 50, and ultimately 10x by age 67.⁸

Other experts suggest a range of 10 to 12 times your pre-retirement income by the time you retire.²

These multiples are useful as benchmarks.

They can tell you if you are generally on track during your working years.

But as a definitive retirement plan, they are dangerously inadequate for several reasons:

• They Ignore Real-World Spending: The rule assumes your retirement spending will be a simple percentage of your pre-retirement income, often cited as 70% to 80%.⁹ But this is a crude average. A couple who saved aggressively and lived frugally might spend far less in retirement. Another couple with expensive travel plans and hobbies might spend more. Furthermore, spending isn’t static; it often follows a “go-go, slow-go, and no-go” pattern, with higher expenses in the active early years, a slowdown in the middle, and a potential rise in healthcare costs later.¹¹ A single multiple can’t capture this dynamic reality.
• They Overlook the Couple Dynamic: The rule treats a couple as a single entity. It doesn’t account for staggered retirement dates, where one partner stops working years before the other.² It also fails to address different longevity profiles. For a 65-year-old couple, there is a high probability that one partner will outlive the other by many years, potentially to age 93 or beyond.¹⁴ The plan must ensure the surviving spouse is financially secure, a nuance the simple multiple ignores.
• They Create a False Sense of Precision: The average retirement savings for married couples aged 55-64 is around $537,560.¹⁵ For many, this is a far cry from the “10x income” rule, which for a household earning $150,000 would be $1.5 million.¹⁶ The rule can feel both unattainable and, as we discovered, insufficient even if reached. It focuses you on a number without preparing you for the variables that truly matter.

The 4% Rule’s Four Fatal Flaws

If the income multiple is the flawed target, the 4% rule is the flawed mechanism.

Conceived by financial planner Bill Bengen in 1994, the rule states that if you withdraw 4% of your portfolio in your first year of retirement and adjust that amount for inflation each year thereafter, your money is highly likely to last for 30 years.⁴

For decades, this has been the bedrock of retirement income planning.

It is also a trap.

Our own crisis revealed its weaknesses, and our subsequent research confirmed them.

The 4% rule suffers from four fatal flaws.

1.

It’s Inflexible and Unrealistic: The rule’s core assumption is that you will spend the same inflation-adjusted amount every single year for 30 years.

Real life simply does not work this Way.¹⁸

As mentioned, spending tends to curve downwards in mid-retirement before healthcare costs may cause it to rise again.¹¹

More importantly, the rule fails to account for changing income streams.

Many couples plan for one spouse’s pension to kick in at a certain age, or they strategically delay Social Security to get a larger payout later.¹⁸

These significant cash flow events are completely ignored by the rule’s rigid withdrawal mandate, potentially causing you to withdraw too much from your portfolio when you don’t need to, or leaving you with too little income in the early years.¹⁸

2.

It Ignores Sequence of Returns Risk: This is the flaw that ambushed us and the single greatest danger of the 4% rule.

“Sequence of returns risk” is the danger that the order in which you experience investment returns will have a dramatic impact on your portfolio’s longevity.¹⁸

If you retire into a strong bull market, your portfolio grows, and your withdrawals are easily covered.

But if you retire into a bear market—as we almost did—the results are catastrophic.

You are forced to sell assets at low prices to fund your living expenses, which permanently depletes your capital base.

This “double whammy” of withdrawals combined with market losses can be impossible to recover from, even if the market roars back years later.¹⁸

A historical example makes this painfully clear: a retiree in 1966 with a 40/60 stock/bond portfolio who followed the 4% rule would have run out of money before age 90, despite fantastic market returns in the 1980s and 90s.

The high inflation and poor returns at the

start of their retirement doomed the plan from the beginning.¹⁸

The 4% rule has no mechanism to adjust for this risk; it blindly tells you to keep selling, no matter the damage.

3.

It’s Based on Outdated and Unstable Assumptions: The original rule was based on a hypothetical portfolio (typically 50% stocks, 50% bonds) and historical U.S. market data from a specific period.⁴

The future may look very different.

In fact, research from Morningstar has shown just how unstable the “safe” withdrawal rate Is. In 2021, against a backdrop of low bond yields and high stock valuations, they calculated the safe rate was just 3.3%.

By 2023, as yields rose, they revised it up to 4.0%.

For 2024, it was back down to 3.7%.¹⁹

The fact that the “safe” number can swing so wildly from year to year proves it is not a reliable, set-it-and-forget-it rule for a 30-year plan.

4.

It Can Be Overly Conservative: Ironically, for all its risks, the rule is often too cautious.

It was designed to survive the absolute worst-case historical scenarios.

This means that in the vast majority of cases, retirees who rigidly follow the 4% rule will end up spending far less than they could have.¹⁸

They live more frugally than necessary and die with huge, unspent balances, having needlessly sacrificed quality of life out of fear.

One study showed that a 4% withdrawal rate gave a retiree a 10% chance of ending up with

less than their starting capital after 30 years, but also a 10% chance of ending up with six times their original capital.¹⁷

The rule protects you from ruin but often at the cost of preventing you from truly living.

Our journey began with the painful realization that these rules, the very foundation of our retirement plan, were built on sand.

We needed a new map, a new way of thinking, and a new framework for the journey ahead.

Section 2: The Epiphany on the Summit: The Real Challenge Isn’t the Ascent, It’s the Descent

After the market downturn shattered our plan, we felt adrift.

The number we had worked our whole lives to achieve had proven to be a mirage.

The feeling wasn’t just financial anxiety; it was a profound sense of failure and disorientation.

We had followed the map, yet we were completely lost.

The epiphany that changed everything for us came not from a financial journal or an economist, but from the world of high-altitude mountaineering.

I was reading an account by Ed Viesturs, a legendary climber who has summited Mount Everest seven times.

He wrote something that struck me with the force of a revelation: “Getting to the summit is optional; getting down is mandatory”.²⁰

In that single sentence, I saw our entire financial lives reframed.

For thirty years, my partner and I had been focused on the ascent.

Our goal was to accumulate assets, to climb higher and higher until we reached the peak—our “magic number.” We measured success by the rising balance of our portfolio.

We had poured all our energy into planning the climb up the mountain.

But we had no plan for the descent.

We had mistakenly believed that reaching the summit was the end of the journey, the moment of ultimate safety.

The mountaineering analogy taught us the opposite: the summit is the point of maximum risk.²⁰

It’s where you are most exposed, where the weather can turn in an instant, and where you have only the provisions you managed to carry with you.

The descent—the phase of spending down your assets, or decumulation—is the more dangerous and technically complex part of the expedition.

It requires a completely different mindset, a different set of tools, and a far more detailed map.²¹

Introducing the “Mountain Expedition” Analogy

This analogy became the new organizing principle for our retirement plan.

It allowed us to move past the simplistic and flawed “magic number” and embrace a more realistic and resilient framework.

• The Ascent (The Accumulation Years): This is the 30-40 year period of our working lives. The goal is clear and singular: climb as high as you can. You have a regular paycheck, which is like a steady supply of climbing gear and provisions. Time is on your side, and the power of compound interest is a strong tailwind pushing you upward. Market downturns during the ascent are opportunities to buy more assets at lower prices, strengthening your future position.²¹
• The Summit (The First Day of Retirement): This is the moment you stop working. It’s a moment of triumph, but also of maximum peril. Your supply line (your paycheck) has been cut. You are now entirely dependent on the resources (your savings) you carried to the top. The weather (the market) is unpredictable, and a storm at this altitude (a market crash early in retirement) can be fatal to the expedition.²⁰ The goal is no longer about going higher; it’s about survival and a safe return to base camp.
• The Descent (The Decumulation/Withdrawal Years): This is the 20-30+ year journey of living off your savings. The entire objective shifts. Success is no longer measured by how high your portfolio balance is, but by whether your provisions can sustain you for the entire journey down.²¹ The risks are inverted. Compound interest, your friend on the ascent, now works against you when you withdraw from a declining portfolio. Sequence of returns risk is the ever-present threat of a sudden blizzard that can leave you stranded. Longevity risk is the terrifying uncertainty of not knowing exactly how long the descent will take.²⁰ You need a “financial Sherpa”—a trusted guide or a robust plan—to navigate this treacherous terrain.

The Psychological Shift

This framework did more than just organize our finances; it transformed our psychology.

The “magic number” paradigm had created anxiety because it was a brittle, all-or-nothing goal.

The “Mountain Expedition” paradigm gave us a process.

It acknowledged our fear of the descent and validated our need for a more cautious, dynamic approach.

Most importantly, it addressed a deep-seated psychological conflict that most retirees face.

For our entire adult lives, we are programmed to be savers.

A rising account balance is “good,” and a falling balance is “bad.” This conditioning is deeply ingrained.

When we retire, we are suddenly required to do the opposite: to spend down our core assets.

Even though this is the plan, every withdrawal can feel like a failure, like a step backward.

This cognitive dissonance creates immense stress and is why many financially secure retirees live in constant fear of running out of money and fail to enjoy the very retirement they worked so hard for.²²

Behavioral finance studies show that the psychological pain of a loss is roughly 2.5 times more powerful than the pleasure of an equivalent gain.²⁴

In the saver’s mindset, every withdrawal is a small loss, creating a constant drip of anxiety.

The “descent” analogy gave us permission to spend.

It reframed withdrawals not as a loss, but as a necessary and planned part of a successful journey.

We weren’t losing ground; we were carefully managing our provisions to ensure we completed the expedition.

This mental shift was the key that unlocked our ability to move from fear to confidence.

We were no longer just savers who had stopped saving; we were now skilled mountaineers navigating a complex but manageable descent.

Section 3: Charting the Expedition: The Three Inescapable Realities of Your Retirement Map

Armed with our new “descent-focused” mindset, my partner and I sat down to create a new map.

Our old map was a single line pointing to a single number.

Our new map had to be a detailed topographical survey of the entire mountain, accounting for the real-world terrain.

We realized it had to be built on three non-negotiable realities we had previously glossed over.

This process sparked the most difficult, vulnerable, and ultimately valuable conversations of our 35-year relationship.

It forced us to move beyond assumptions and into explicit, shared agreements.²⁵

Reality #1: The Destination (Aligning Your Lifestyle, Goals & Longevity)

Before you can figure out how much you need, you must have a crystal-clear, shared vision of what you are planning for.

For a couple, this is the absolute foundation.

It’s about building the “picture on the boxtop” before you try to sort the thousands of puzzle pieces.²⁷

• The Critical Conversations: Forging a Shared Vision: We learned that my “ideal retirement” and my partner’s were not identical. I pictured quiet days, gardening, and local travel. He envisioned long international trips and taking up new, expensive hobbies. Neither was right or wrong, but they had vastly different price tags. We had to have the conversations.²⁸

• What does retirement look like? Couples must move from vague notions to specifics. Where will you live? Will you downsize or stay put?⁹ Will you travel extensively or stay close to family?³⁰ Will you work part-time?² Writing down individual “bucket lists” and then merging them into a prioritized “couple’s list” is a powerful exercise.³¹
• How do we handle risk? It’s common for one spouse to be a conservative investor while the other is more aggressive. This difference in risk tolerance can be a major source of conflict.²⁴ Openly discussing this is key. A practical solution is to compromise on a blended asset allocation for the joint portfolio. Another is to maintain smaller, separate accounts where each partner can invest according to their own style, satisfying the psychological need for control without jeopardizing the core plan.²⁴
• How long is the journey? This is the most sobering conversation. It’s not about morbidity; it’s about realism. People are living longer. According to the Social Security Administration, a 65-year-old man today can expect to live to 84, and a woman to 86.³² For a 65-year-old couple, there is a one-in-four chance that one of them will live past 95.³² This means a retirement plan must be stress-tested for a 30-year or even longer timeframe. Using the SSA’s own life expectancy calculator can be a helpful, objective starting point for this discussion.³³

Reality #2: The Unpredictable Terrain (The True Cost of Healthcare & Long-Term Care)

This is the great white whale of retirement planning—the single largest and most unpredictable expense that most couples dangerously underestimate.

Our old plan had a generic line item for “healthcare.” Our new map has a detailed, well-funded expedition route through this treacherous terrain.

• The Staggering Number: Let this sink in: Fidelity’s 2024 research estimates that an average 65-year-old couple retiring today will need approximately $330,000 in today’s dollars, after taxes, to cover healthcare expenses throughout their retirement.³⁴ This number has more than doubled since 2002.³⁶ The shock comes from the gap between perception and reality. Surveys show that the average American expects a couple to spend only about $75,000 on healthcare in retirement—less than a quarter of the projected cost.³⁶ This isn’t a small miscalculation; it’s a catastrophic planning failure waiting to happen.
• Breaking Down the Costs: It’s crucial to understand what this $330,000 figure covers—and what it doesn’t. It accounts for the premiums for Medicare Part B (doctor visits) and Part D (prescriptions), as well as the deductibles, copayments, and out-of-pocket costs for services that original Medicare doesn’t fully cover, such as dental, vision, and hearing care.³⁵ Tools like the Vanguard Health Care Cost Estimator, developed with Mercer, can provide a more personalized projection based on location, health status, and chosen Medicare plans.³⁸ It’s also important to note that higher-income retirees face an additional surcharge on their Medicare premiums, known as the Income-Related Monthly Adjustment Amount (IRMAA), which can significantly increase costs.³⁵
• The Long-Term Care Catastrophe: The $330,000 estimate does not include the potentially devastating cost of long-term care (LTC).³⁴ About 70% of people over the age of 65 will require some form of long-term care in their lifetime.⁴⁰ The costs are astronomical: in 2021, the median annual cost for a private room in a nursing home facility was over $108,000.⁴² A few years of this level of care can completely wipe out a lifetime of savings. This is not a risk you can ignore. A couple must have an explicit plan for funding LTC, which typically involves one of three strategies:

1. Self-Funding: Intentionally setting aside a large pool of assets specifically for potential LTC costs.
2. Traditional LTC Insurance: Purchasing a policy that helps cover the costs of care. Premiums are typically lower when purchased in your 50s or early 60s.⁴³
3. Hybrid Life/LTC Policies: These newer insurance products combine a life insurance death benefit with an LTC rider. If you need care, you can access the benefit. If you don’t, your heirs receive a death benefit.⁴³

• The Ultimate Expedition Gear: The Health Savings Account (HSA): If there is one “magic bullet” for healthcare costs, it is the HSA. Available to those with a high-deductible health plan, the HSA is a retirement-saving superpower due to its unique triple-tax advantage:

1. Contributions are tax-deductible.
2. The money grows tax-free.
3. Withdrawals are tax-free when used for qualified medical expenses.⁴⁴
   
   This makes it superior to both a 401(k) and a Roth IRA for funding medical costs. For couples, the family contribution limit allows for significant savings over time. An HSA should be the first dollar saved for healthcare in retirement, a dedicated bucket of tax-free money to deploy against this massive future expense.46

Reality #3: The Shifting Climate (The Dual Threat of Inflation & Taxes)

The final reality is that the financial climate will change over your 30-year descent.

Two forces, inflation and taxes, will constantly seek to erode your purchasing power and deplete your savings.

• General Inflation (The Silent Thief): While you are working, your salary increases often help mitigate the rising cost of living. Once you retire, you are on a more fixed income, and inflation becomes a formidable enemy. Even a seemingly benign 3% average inflation rate will cause prices to double in 24 years, significantly eroding the value of your savings over a long retirement.⁴⁸ Your investment plan for the descent
  must include assets, like stocks, that are expected to grow faster than inflation over the long term. While Social Security provides a Cost-of-Living Adjustment (COLA), it only protects a portion of your total income and may not keep pace with your personal inflation rate, especially for healthcare.⁴⁸
• Lifestyle Inflation (The Insidious Creep): A more subtle but equally potent threat is “lifestyle inflation” or “lifestyle creep.” This is the natural tendency to increase your spending as your income rises during your career.⁵⁰ A bigger house, nicer cars, more expensive vacations—these gradually become your new normal. The danger is that this inflates the very lifestyle your retirement savings must now support. Resisting this creep in the final decade of your working years by directing raises and bonuses toward savings instead of spending can dramatically reduce the size of the nest egg you’ll need.⁵¹
• The Tax “Gotcha”: A common and costly mistake is assuming that your tax burden will disappear in retirement. For most couples, this is far from the truth. Withdrawals from traditional 401(k)s, 403(b)s, and IRAs—where the majority of many couples’ savings are held—are taxed as ordinary income.⁵³ A large withdrawal to fund a “go-go” year of travel could easily push you into a higher tax bracket. This is why tax diversification is a critical strategy for the descent. By holding savings in three types of accounts—
  Pre-Tax (like a traditional 401(k)), Tax-Free (like a Roth IRA or Roth 401(k)), and Taxable (like a brokerage account)—you give yourself the flexibility to manage your tax bill each year. In a year where you need more income, you can pull from your Roth account without increasing your taxable income. This strategic withdrawal planning is a key part of navigating the descent efficiently.⁵⁴

We came to understand that these three realities are not separate challenges but a deeply interconnected system.

A decision about lifestyle directly impacts the amount of money exposed to inflation and taxes, which in turn can affect your healthcare costs through IRMAA surcharges.

A plan that treats these as a simple checklist is destined to fail.

A plan that understands them as a dynamic system can build true, resilient security.

Section 4: Our Expedition Gear: The Three-Bucket Strategy for a Safe Descent

Our single biggest fear after our old plan crumbled was market volatility.

The thought of our life’s savings being subject to the whims of the stock market was paralyzing.

How could we ever feel confident spending money if a crash could wipe out 20% of our portfolio at any moment? The answer, we discovered, was to stop thinking of our retirement savings as one big, vulnerable pile of money.

The solution was the “bucket strategy.” This framework, also known as the “3-bucket strategy,” is designed to solve both the mathematical and psychological challenges of the descent.⁵⁶

It works by dividing your assets into three distinct pools, or buckets, each with a specific job, time horizon, and risk profile.

This structure creates a crucial buffer against market downturns and, just as importantly, provides the emotional permission to spend confidently from the portion of your money that is shielded from risk.⁵⁷

The true power of this strategy is that it is fundamentally a behavioral finance tool.

Its structure is engineered to mitigate the most destructive emotional responses retirees face: panic selling during a crash and irrational fear of spending.

By creating a system of “mental accounting,” it allows you to separate your money in your mind.

“Bucket 1 is for this year’s bills; Bucket 3 is for 15 years from now.” When the market (affecting Bucket 3) plummets, you don’t feel that your ability to pay the mortgage is threatened, because that money is safe and sound in Bucket 1.

This short-circuits the panic response that leads so many to sell their growth assets at the absolute worst time.

It’s a system designed to protect you from yourself.

The Core Solution: A Detailed Guide to the Retirement Bucket Strategy

Here is a detailed breakdown of how we structured our three buckets, a framework that any couple can adapt to their own needs.

Bucket 1: The Base Camp (Years 1-3 of Living Expenses)

• Purpose: This is your liquidity bucket, your immediate cash reserve. Its sole job is to provide stable, predictable income to cover one to three years of your essential living expenses, no matter what is happening in the stock or bond markets. This bucket is your psychological bedrock; it’s the fund that allows you to sleep at night during a market storm and gives you the confidence to spend on your daily needs.⁵⁷
• Assets: The assets in this bucket must be safe, liquid, and not subject to market fluctuation. The goal here is 100% preservation of capital, not growth. Suitable assets include:

• Cash in a high-yield savings account
• Money market funds
• Short-term Certificates of Deposit (CDs)
• Short-duration U.S. Treasury bills ⁵⁶
• How it Works: You draw your monthly “paycheck” from this bucket to cover all your core expenses—mortgage, utilities, groceries, insurance premiums, etc. By having several years of cash on hand, you completely insulate yourself from the need to sell stocks or other growth assets during a market downturn to pay your bills.

Bucket 2: The Ascent Cache (Years 4-10 of Living Expenses)

• Purpose: This is your income-and-stability bucket. Its primary job is to generate reliable income and modest growth, with the goal of systematically refilling Bucket 1 as it gets depleted. It takes on moderate risk to stay ahead of inflation but is still relatively conservative.⁵⁷
• Assets: This bucket holds a balanced mix of investments designed for income and stability. The allocation should be tailored to your risk tolerance, but it typically includes:

• High-quality intermediate-term bonds and bond funds
• Conservative dividend-paying large-cap stocks (utility stocks are a classic example)
• Real Estate Investment Trusts (REITs)
• Preferred stocks
• Balanced or growth-and-income mutual funds ⁵⁶
• How it Works: Periodically—for example, at the end of each year—you review this bucket. You sell off any appreciated assets and use the proceeds, along with any dividends or interest earned, to top off Bucket 1 back to its target level (e.g., three years of expenses). This is done strategically, ideally in years when the market is flat or up.

Bucket 3: The Summit Push (Funds for Year 11+)

• Purpose: This is your long-term growth engine. Its job is to grow significantly over the long haul, outpacing inflation and ensuring the entire three-bucket system is sustainable for a 30-year or longer retirement. The growth from this bucket is what will eventually be used to refill Bucket 2, which in turn refills Bucket 1.⁵⁶
• Assets: This bucket is invested for growth and can therefore take on higher risk, as it has a time horizon of 10+ years. It should be a well-diversified portfolio of growth-oriented assets, such as:

• Domestic and international stock index funds or ETFs (covering small, mid, and large-cap)
• Growth-oriented mutual funds
• Individual growth stocks ⁵⁸
• How it Works: You should plan to touch this bucket as infrequently as possible. You only harvest gains from Bucket 3 to refill Bucket 2 during strong market years. In a bear market, you leave this bucket completely untouched, allowing it the time it needs to recover. The security provided by Buckets 1 and 2 is what gives you the fortitude to let Bucket 3 ride out the market volatility without panicking.

This systematic process of drawing from the safest bucket and refilling it from the progressively riskier ones is the mechanical heart of the strategy.

It creates an orderly, rules-based approach to generating retirement income that replaces fear and guesswork with process and confidence.

Table 1: The Three-Bucket Retirement Portfolio Framework

To make this framework concrete, the following table summarizes the key characteristics of each bucket.

Bucket Name	Purpose	Time Horizon	Typical Asset Allocation	Role in the System
Bucket 1: Base Camp	Immediate Liquidity & Spending	Years 1-3	100% Cash & Cash Equivalents (High-yield savings, money market funds, short-term T-bills)	Provides the annual “paycheck” for living expenses, insulating the plan from short-term market volatility.
Bucket 2: Ascent Cache	Stability & Income Generation	Years 4-10	Balanced Mix (e.g., 40% Stocks / 60% Bonds). High-quality bonds, dividend stocks, REITs, balanced funds.	Generates income and moderate growth to systematically refill Bucket 1. Acts as a buffer between cash and long-term growth assets.
Bucket 3: Summit Push	Long-Term Growth	Years 11+	Growth-Oriented (e.g., 80% Stocks / 20% Bonds). Diversified domestic & international stocks, growth funds.	Provides long-term growth to outpace inflation and refills Bucket 2 over time, ensuring the entire system is sustainable.

This structure transformed our retirement.

It gave us a clear, actionable plan that we could manage together, turning the terrifying concept of “spending our savings” into a calm, logical process.

Section 5: Mastering Your Tools: The Strategic Levers That Power Your Descent

Having a detailed map (our Three Realities) and the right expedition gear (our Three-Bucket Strategy) was a monumental step forward.

It gave us structure and a sense of control.

But we quickly learned that a successful descent also requires mastering the specialized tools that control your pace and safety.

For a retiring couple, this means understanding and skillfully operating three critical financial levers.

These levers are not independent decisions; they form an integrated cash-flow engine.

The optimal setting for one is entirely dependent on the settings of the others.

Calibrating them together is the key to creating the most efficient and resilient income stream for your specific situation.

Lever #1: The Social Security Maximizer for Couples

For most couples, Social Security is the foundational income stream in retirement.

It’s government-guaranteed, inflation-adjusted, and lasts for life.

But it’s also far more complex than simply deciding when to turn it on.

For a couple, maximizing this benefit is a strategic exercise in coordination.⁵⁹

• The Split Strategy: The Cornerstone of Couple’s Planning: The most powerful and common strategy for couples is the “split strategy”.⁵⁹ This involves having the two spouses claim their benefits at different times. The optimal approach for most is for the lower-earning spouse to claim their benefit earlier (anytime from age 62 to their Full Retirement Age, or FRA) to generate initial cash flow for the household. Meanwhile, the higher-earning spouse delays claiming their benefit for as long as possible, ideally until age 70.⁵⁹
• Why this works: For every year you delay claiming Social Security past your FRA (up to age 70), your benefit increases by about 8%.¹⁴ By having the higher earner delay, you are applying that 8% annual increase to a much larger base benefit, which results in a significantly higher monthly check for the rest of their life.⁵⁹
• The Overlooked Power of Spousal and Survivor Benefits: The split strategy’s true genius lies in how it maximizes survivor benefits. This is a crucial, often misunderstood, piece of financial protection for couples.

• Spousal Benefits: A spouse is entitled to a benefit based on their own work record, OR up to 50% of their partner’s benefit at FRA, whichever is higher. This is particularly valuable if one spouse had significantly lower lifetime earnings.¹⁴
• Survivor Benefits: This is the critical insurance policy. When one spouse dies, the surviving spouse is entitled to receive 100% of the deceased spouse’s benefit (or their own, whichever is larger).⁶¹ By having the higher earner delay until age 70, you are locking in the largest possible monthly payment not just for their lifetime, but as a permanent, inflation-adjusted income stream for their surviving partner. This single decision can be the difference between financial security and hardship for the spouse who lives longer.¹⁴

Lever #2: The Pension & Annuity Decision

For couples fortunate enough to have a traditional defined-benefit pension, a critical and irreversible decision awaits at retirement: should you take the benefit as a lump-sum payout or as a guaranteed lifetime stream of income (an annuity)?.⁶³

• Lump Sum vs. Annuity: A lump sum offers flexibility and control. You can invest the money as you see fit and pass on any remaining balance to your heirs. However, it also transfers all the risk—market risk, inflation risk, and longevity risk—squarely onto your shoulders.⁶⁴ An annuity, on the other hand, transfers that risk to the insurance company, providing a predictable paycheck for life, much like Social Security.⁶³
• The Couple’s Imperative: The Joint-and-Survivor Annuity: This is a non-negotiable point of discussion for couples. A pension will typically offer several annuity options. A “single life” option provides the highest monthly payout, but those payments stop completely when the retiree dies.⁶⁴ For a couple, this can be a catastrophic choice, as it could leave the surviving spouse with a sudden and permanent loss of income.
  
  The correct choice for most couples is a joint and survivor annuity. This option provides a slightly lower monthly payment, but in exchange, it guarantees that a portion of that payment (typically 50% or 100%) will continue for the lifetime of the surviving spouse.64 Choosing a 100% joint-and-survivor option provides the ultimate protection for the surviving partner, ensuring their income stream remains stable. This decision is a powerful act of financial care between partners.

Lever #3: The Dynamic Withdrawal System

The bucket strategy provides the structure, but a dynamic withdrawal system provides the flexibility.

This is the advanced technique that allows your plan to breathe, adapting to market conditions in a controlled, rules-based Way. Instead of a rigid 4% withdrawal, dynamic spending allows you to spend a little more in good years and trim back slightly in bad years, all while protecting your core lifestyle.⁶⁶

• The “Guardrails” Approach: A simple yet powerful way to implement dynamic spending is the “guardrails” method.⁶⁷ Here’s how it works:

1. Set a Target Withdrawal Rate: Based on your plan, you establish an initial target withdrawal rate (e.g., 4.5% of your portfolio).
2. Establish a Ceiling and a Floor: You then set rules for how much your spending can change year to year. For example, you might set a “ceiling” that says you will never increase your withdrawal amount by more than 5% from the previous year, no matter how well the market does. This prevents lifestyle inflation from getting out of control during a bull market. You also set a “floor” that says you will never decrease your withdrawal amount by more than 1.5% from the previous year, no matter how badly the market performs. This protects your essential spending from being slashed during a downturn.⁶⁶
3. Adjust Annually: Each year, you calculate your target withdrawal based on the new portfolio value. If that amount falls within your floor and ceiling, you take it. If it’s above the ceiling, you only take the ceiling amount. If it’s below the floor, you take the floor amount.⁶⁷

This dynamic approach, when layered on top of the bucket strategy, dictates how and when you refill the buckets.

In a great market year, your guardrails might allow you to take a larger withdrawal, using the excess to more fully fund Bucket 1.

In a down market year, your guardrails would dictate a smaller withdrawal, preserving your long-term capital in Buckets 2 and 3.

This combination of structure and flexibility is what creates a truly resilient plan for the long descent.

Section 6: The View from Base Camp: Trading Anxiety for a Confident Journey

Today, my partner and I are living our retirement.

It looks a lot like the life of Cyndie and Mark, a couple whose story we read about and took to heart.

They started saving a bit late but were disciplined, made smart choices about insurance, and built a plan that gave them guaranteed income streams through annuities and a strategic Social Security plan.⁶⁸

Like them, we are debt-free aside from our mortgage.

We have time for hobbies, family, and volunteering.

But the biggest change isn’t in what we do; it’s in how we feel.

The tyranny of the magic number is gone.

The constant, low-grade anxiety about market swings has been replaced by a quiet confidence in our process.

We no longer live in fear of a single, brittle number.

We have a map, the right gear, and we know how to use our tools.

Our life is now governed by a rhythm of intentional planning.

We have our quarterly “financial date night,” a concept we embraced to ensure we stay aligned and transparent.⁶⁹

We review our spending, check the levels in our three buckets, and make sure our plan still reflects our shared vision.

There are no secrets and no assumptions.⁷¹

We know exactly which bucket to draw our monthly income from.

We see our Social Security and annuity checks hit our bank account, forming the solid floor of our “Base Camp” bucket, covering all our essential needs.

We know how to apply our “guardrails” to adjust our discretionary spending based on how the markets are behaving.

The Transformation: From Fragile Certainty to Resilient Confidence

Our journey was a difficult one, but it led us to a profound understanding.

The conventional approach to retirement planning, with its focus on a single accumulation goal, gives you a fragile certainty.

It feels secure right up until the moment it isn’t, and then it shatters completely.

Our new framework—the “descent” paradigm—has given us a resilient confidence.

It’s a confidence born not from a static number, but from a dynamic, flexible process that we manage together.

Let’s recap the journey that any couple can take to achieve this same transformation:

1. Acknowledge the Flawed Map: Recognize that simple rules of thumb like the 10x income multiple and the 4% rule are inadequate and dangerous starting points for a couple’s complex, multi-decade retirement.
2. Embrace the “Descent” Mindset: Shift your focus from the ascent (accumulation) to the more critical and complex descent (decumulation). Understand that retirement day is the point of maximum risk, not maximum safety.
3. Chart Your Unique Expedition: Have the deep, honest conversations required to build a shared map based on the three inescapable realities: your specific lifestyle goals and longevity, the true costs of healthcare, and the dual threats of inflation and taxes.
4. Pack Your Expedition Gear: Implement the three-bucket strategy to structure your portfolio. This provides a behavioral framework to manage volatility, giving you a safe pool for immediate spending (Bucket 1), a stable reserve for refilling (Bucket 2), and a long-term engine for growth (Bucket 3).
5. Master Your Tools: Learn to operate the three strategic levers of your cash-flow engine. Maximize your joint Social Security benefits, make the right pension choices for a couple (joint-and-survivor), and use a dynamic withdrawal strategy to provide flexibility.

The ultimate goal of this framework is not to create a perfect, unchangeable plan.

Life is too unpredictable for that.

The goal is to give you and your partner a durable process for making decisions together, for adapting to change, and for navigating the future with clarity and collaboration.²⁸

Planning for retirement is one of the most profound and challenging acts of partnership.

It is a journey that will test your communication, your trust, and your shared values.

But by trading the anxiety of a magic number for the confidence of a resilient process, you can transform it from a source of fear into a source of strength.

You can build a shared future with intention, and a plan robust enough to weather any storm you may face on the long, but ultimately rewarding, journey down the mountain.

Works cited

1. 9 Best Retirement Plans In July 2025 – Bankrate, accessed July 25, 2025, https://www.bankrate.com/retirement/best-retirement-plans/
2. Should you and your spouse retire at the same time?, accessed July 25, 2025, https://www.northamericancompany.com/plan-for-tomorrow/retire-together-as-a-couple
3. What is a good monthly retirement income for a couple? – unbiased.com, accessed July 25, 2025, https://www.unbiased.com/discover/retirement/monthly-retirement-income-for-couples
4. Spending in Retirement: Beyond the 4% Rule | Charles Schwab, accessed July 25, 2025, https://www.schwab.com/learn/story/beyond-4-rule-how-much-can-you-spend-retirement
5. What’s a Good Monthly Retirement Income for a Couple in 2025 | SoFi, accessed July 25, 2025, https://www.sofi.com/learn/content/what-is-a-good-monthly-retirement-income-for-a-couple/
6. 16 Retirement Mistakes You Will Regret Forever | Kiplinger, accessed July 25, 2025, https://www.kiplinger.com/slideshow/retirement/t047-s001-retirement-mistakes-you-will-regret-forever/index.html
7. 5 Biggest Retirement Planning Mistakes That People Make – SuperGuy.com, accessed July 25, 2025, https://superguy.com.au/retirement/biggest-retirement-planning-mistakes/
8. How much do I need to retire? | Fidelity, accessed July 25, 2025, https://www.fidelity.com/viewpoints/retirement/how-much-do-i-need-to-retire
9. Retirement Planning for Couples: A Checklist – New York Life Insurance, accessed July 25, 2025, https://www.newyorklife.com/articles/financial-considerations-for-retired-married-couples
10. How Much Does a Couple Need to Retire? – Western & Southern Financial Group, accessed July 25, 2025, https://www.westernsouthern.com/retirement/how-much-does-a-couple-need-to-retire
11. 4 Things Near Retirees Must Know About the 4% Rule – Sensible Money, accessed July 25, 2025, https://www.sensiblemoney.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/02/Sensible-Money-4-Rule-Report-2025-v2.pdf
12. How much will you spend in retirement? – Fidelity Investments, accessed July 25, 2025, https://www.fidelity.com/viewpoints/retirement/spending-in-retirement
13. Retirement Planning for Couples: Key Considerations – Penny Lane Wealth Management, accessed July 25, 2025, https://www.pennylanewealthmgmt.com/post/retirement-planning-for-couples-key-considerations
14. Social Security tips for couples – Fidelity Investments, accessed July 25, 2025, https://www.fidelity.com/viewpoints/retirement/social-security-tips-for-couples
15. Average Retirement Savings by Age for Married Couples: Are You …, accessed July 25, 2025, https://www.kubera.com/blog/average-retirement-savings-for-married-couples-by-age
16. Average Retirement Savings for Married Couples by Age – SmartAsset, accessed July 25, 2025, https://smartasset.com/retirement/average-retirement-savings-for-married-couples-by-age
17. Why the 4% rule shouldn’t be ‘the tail that wags the dog’ – Fidelity Adviser Solutions, accessed July 25, 2025, https://adviserservices.fidelity.co.uk/news-insights/financial-advisor-insights/insights-and-opinions/why-the-four-rule-shouldnt-be-the-tail-that-wags-the-dog/
18. Why You Shouldn’t Use the 4% Rule In Retirement (And a Better …, accessed July 25, 2025, https://www.daytonestateplanninglaw.com/episodes/why-you-shouldnt-use-the-4-rule-in-retirement-and-a-better-strategy/
19. Morningstar’s Retirement Income Research: Reevaluating the 4% Withdrawal Rule, accessed July 25, 2025, https://www.morningstar.com/retirement/morningstars-retirement-income-research-reevaluating-4-withdrawal-rule
20. Retirement is like coming down a mountain – it needs a careful approach, accessed July 25, 2025, https://proposito.co.uk/retirement-is-like-coming-down-a-mountain-it-needs-a-careful-approach/
21. In Retirement Planning, Consider the Entire Journey | Kiplinger, accessed July 25, 2025, https://www.kiplinger.com/retirement/in-retirement-planning-consider-the-entire-journey
22. The Emotional Side of Planning Your Retirement, accessed July 25, 2025, https://www.albright.edu/sloan/fac_retirement/Docs/Emotional%20Retirement%20Planning.pdf
23. Are you ready for the emotional side of retirement? – IG Wealth Management, accessed July 25, 2025, https://www.ig.ca/en/insights/are-you-ready-for-the-emotional-side-of-retirement
24. How to Navigate Different Risk Tolerances Between Spouses, accessed July 25, 2025, https://convergence-co.com/financial/different-risk-tolerances-between-spouses/
25. The Conversations Couples Should Have Before Retirement …, accessed July 25, 2025, https://www.northwesternmutual.com/life-and-money/the-conversations-couples-should-have-before-retirement/
26. Effective Strategies for Financial Communication: A Guide to Financial Conversations for Couples | Berkshire Money Management, accessed July 25, 2025, https://berkshiremm.com/effective-strategies-for-financial-communication-a-guide-to-financial-conversations-for-couples/
27. What is Financial Planning? A Few Analogies to Help You Understand, accessed July 25, 2025, https://flowfp.com/financial-planning-analogies/
28. Retirement for Couples: 10 Essential Planning Conversations for a Happily Ever After, accessed July 25, 2025, https://www.boldin.com/retirement/survive-retirement-with-your-spouse/
29. How to Align Your Retirement Goals as a Married Couple for a Secure Financial Future, accessed July 25, 2025, https://www.apw-ifa.co.uk/align-your-retirement-goals-married-couple/
30. Retirement Planning for Couples: The Focal 15-Point Checklist – Marriage.com, accessed July 25, 2025, https://www.marriage.com/advice/relationship/retirement-prep-committed-couple/
31. 6 unexpected pitfalls in retirement planning for couples – I can’t believe I missed this!, accessed July 25, 2025, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EtGcaMcQsd4
32. Lifestyle Inflation in Retirement: How to Maintain Balance – Nic McLeod, accessed July 25, 2025, https://www.njmnwa.com/blog-post/lifestyle-inflation-in-retirement-how-to-maintain-balance
33. Retirement & Survivors Benefits: Life Expectancy Calculator – SSA, accessed July 25, 2025, https://www.ssa.gov/oact/population/longevity.html
34. Retiree Health Care Costs on the Rise Again, According to Fidelity Study, accessed July 25, 2025, https://soundmindinvesting.com/articles/retiree-health-care-costs-on-the-rise-again-according-to-fidelity-study
35. Prepare for health care in retirement | Fidelity Investments, accessed July 25, 2025, https://www.fidelity.com/learning-center/wealth-management-insights/how-to-prepare-for-health-care-costs-in-retirement
36. Fidelity Investments® Releases 2024 Retiree Health Care Cost Estimate as Americans Seek Clarity Around Medicare Selection, accessed July 25, 2025, https://newsroom.fidelity.com/pressreleases/fidelity-investments–releases-2024-retiree-health-care-cost-estimate-as-americans-seek-clarity-arou/s/7322cc17-0b90-46c4-ba49-38d6e91c3961
37. Costs Soar for Health Care in Retirement, per Fidelity Report | PLANSPONSOR, accessed July 25, 2025, https://www.plansponsor.com/costs-soar-for-health-care-in-retirement-per-fidelity-report/
38. Health Care Cost Estimator – Vanguard for Advisors, accessed July 25, 2025, https://advisors.vanguard.com/wealth-management/healthcare-costs-in-retirement/calculator
39. Health Care Estimator – Vanguard for Advisors, accessed July 25, 2025, https://advisors.vanguard.com/wealth-management/health-care-cost-estimator
40. Retirement planning solo vs. coupled – what’s different – Equitable, accessed July 25, 2025, https://equitable.com/perspectives/planning/2024/retirement-planning-solo-vs-coupled-whats-different
41. Healthcare costs in retirement What is important to know? – Fidelity Investments, accessed July 25, 2025, https://www.fidelity.com/bin-public/060_www_fidelity_com/documents/landing-zones/WI-Healthcare-in-retirement.pdf
42. How much will I really need for health care in retirement? – MassMutual Blog, accessed July 25, 2025, https://blog.massmutual.com/retiring-investing/healthcare-costs-retirement
43. How long-term care planning can help your loved ones | Fidelity, accessed July 25, 2025, https://www.fidelity.com/viewpoints/personal-finance/long-term-care-planning
44. How to pay for healthcare costs in retirement – U.S. Bank, accessed July 25, 2025, https://www.usbank.com/retirement-planning/financial-perspectives/healthcare-costs-in-retirement.html
45. Common Types of Retirement Plans and Other Ways to Save – Charles Schwab, accessed July 25, 2025, https://www.schwab.com/learn/story/types-of-retirement-plans
46. Retiring? How Much You’ll Need for Healthcare Costs – Alliance Benefits, accessed July 25, 2025, https://www.alliancebenefits.org/retiring-how-much-youll-need-for-healthcare-costs/
47. How to plan for rising health care costs – Fidelity Investments, accessed July 25, 2025, https://www.fidelity.com/viewpoints/personal-finance/plan-for-rising-health-care-costs
48. How Does Inflation Impact Retirement Income?, accessed July 25, 2025, https://www.actsretirement.org/resources-advice/finance-saving-money/saving-money-after-retirement/how-does-inflation-impact-retirement-income/
49. The costs of retirement and how to estimate them (article) | Khan Academy, accessed July 25, 2025, https://www.khanacademy.org/economics-finance-domain/economics-personal-finance-va/x3ed8f3aede624754:saving-investing/x3ed8f3aede624754:planning-for-retirement/a/the-cost-of-retirement-and-how-to-estimate-them
50. Lifestyle Inflation: What It Is, How It Works, and Example – Investopedia, accessed July 25, 2025, https://www.investopedia.com/terms/l/lifestyle-inflation.asp
51. Lifestyle Inflation and What It Means for Your Retirement Plan – Align Financial, accessed July 25, 2025, https://www.align.financial/lifestyle-inflation-and-what-it-means-for-your-retirement-plan/
52. Resisting Lifestyle Inflation – AGFinancial, accessed July 25, 2025, https://www.agfinancial.org/resources/article/resisting-lifestyle-inflation
53. Best Retirement Plans for July 2025 – NerdWallet, accessed July 25, 2025, https://www.nerdwallet.com/article/investing/best-retirement-plans-for-you
54. 9 Retirement Planning Mistakes and How to Avoid Them – Peak Financial Planning, accessed July 25, 2025, https://www.thepeakfp.com/blog/9-retirement-mistakes-and-how-to-avoid-them
55. Retirement & Rising Costs: Managing Inflation Risk – Cetera Investor Center, accessed July 25, 2025, https://www.ceterainvestorcenter.com/resource-center/retirement/retirement-rising-costs-managing-inflation-risk
56. What Is the Retirement Bucket Strategy? – SmartAsset, accessed July 25, 2025, https://smartasset.com/retirement/retirement-bucket-strategy
57. What Is a Retirement Bucket Strategy? | U.S. Bank, accessed July 25, 2025, https://www.usbank.com/retirement-planning/financial-perspectives/managing-retirement-during-market-downturns.html
58. A Comprehensive Guide to the Retirement Bucket Strategy – Peak Financial Planning, accessed July 25, 2025, https://www.thepeakfp.com/blog/retirement-bucket-strategy-comprehensive-guide
59. Social Security strategies for Married Couples | Vanguard, accessed July 25, 2025, https://investor.vanguard.com/investor-resources-education/social-security/strategies-for-married-couples
60. Strategies to Maximize Social Security for Married Couples, accessed July 25, 2025, https://smartasset.com/retirement/social-security-strategies-for-married-couples
61. Survivors Benefits – SSA, accessed July 25, 2025, https://www.ssa.gov/pubs/EN-05-10084.pdf
62. Social Security When A Spouse Dies – A Guide To Survivor Benefits – AARP, accessed July 25, 2025, https://www.aarp.org/social-security/faq/when-spouse-dies/
63. Annuity or Lump Sum | Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation, accessed July 25, 2025, https://www.pbgc.gov/wr/benefits/annuity-or-lump-sum
64. Pension Payouts: Lump Sum vs. Annuity – Charles Schwab, accessed July 25, 2025, https://www.schwab.com/learn/story/investing-lump-sum-vs-annuity
65. Types of retirement plan benefits | Internal Revenue Service, accessed July 25, 2025, https://www.irs.gov/retirement-plans/types-of-retirement-plan-benefits
66. A guide to retirement withdrawal strategies | Vanguard, accessed July 25, 2025, https://investor.vanguard.com/investor-resources-education/article/retirement-withdrawal-strategies
67. Dynamic Spending in Retirement – Motley Fool Wealth Management, accessed July 25, 2025, https://foolwealth.com/insights/dynamic-spending-in-retirement
68. How one couple is moving from saving to living in retirement | Fidelity, accessed July 25, 2025, https://www.fidelity.com/learning-center/personal-finance/retirement/going-from-saving-to-living-in-retirement
69. Financial Planning for Couples: Make Date Night a Money Talk – Wounded Warrior Project, accessed July 25, 2025, https://newsroom.woundedwarriorproject.org/Financial-Planning-for-Couples-Make-Date-Night-a-Money-Talk
70. How couples can talk about money and finances – Fidelity Investments, accessed July 25, 2025, https://www.fidelity.com/learning-center/personal-finance/communication-tips-couples
71. For Love and Money: Financial Planning for Couples, accessed July 25, 2025, https://www.fiducientadvisors.com/blog/for-love-and-money-financial-planning-for-couples
72. The Do’s & Don’ts of Financial Planning for Couples – FFCCU, accessed July 25, 2025, https://www.ffcommunity.com/financial_planning_for_couples
73. How We Helped Nancie and Mark, a Professional Couple, Decide …, accessed July 25, 2025, https://capitaladvantage.com/case-study/deciding-when-professional-couple-could-afford-to-retire/