The Unwritten Rules of the Road: A Journey Through the At-Fault Insurance Maze

Introduction: The Jolt

The sound was a violent, percussive crunch that seemed to occupy all available space, followed by an unnatural silence.

For a moment, the world was just the acrid smell of a deployed airbag and the glittering dust of shattered safety glass hanging in the afternoon Sun. A car had blown through a stop sign and T-boned the protagonist’s sedan as it proceeded lawfully through the intersection.

The immediate aftermath unfolded by the book.

A quick check for injuries, a shaky 911 call, and a careful move to the relative safety of the shoulder.¹

Adrenaline masking the nascent ache in their neck and back, the driver meticulously followed the steps they had always been told to take.

They used their phone to capture everything: a photo of the other driver’s license and insurance card, the crumpled metal of both vehicles, the offending stop sign standing ignored, and the wide intersection that should have been safe.³

When the police arrived, the driver calmly gave their statement, got the officer’s name and badge number, and was told the official report would be ready in a few days.⁵

The other driver was profusely apologetic, a fact the protagonist naively filed away as a clear admission of guilt.

Driving the wounded vehicle home, the metallic groan of the damaged frame a constant reminder of the violation, the driver felt shaken but ultimately secure.

They lived in an “at-fault” state.

The fault here seemed undeniable.

The process, they believed, would be a simple, if inconvenient, matter of the other driver’s insurance company making things right.

This confidence, born of a logical assumption about how the world should work, would soon collide with the complex reality of how it actually does.

Part I: The Collision and the Confusion

The journey from confidence to confusion began with a single phone call.

This initial phase of the claims process revealed a system that was not designed for simple restitution but for complex negotiation, where the unwritten rules mattered far more than the written ones.

The emotional and financial toll of navigating this opaque bureaucracy quickly began to mount.

The First Call and the First Crack in the Foundation

The protagonist initiated the process by filing a claim directly with the other driver’s insurance company, a decision that seemed logical at the time.

This is known as a “third-party” claim.⁶

The representative on the phone was polite, professional, and entirely noncommittal, issuing a claim number and the name of an adjuster who would be in touch.

This first step plunged the driver into the center of a fundamental divide in American auto insurance: the at-fault system versus the no-fault system.

In the 38 at-fault states (plus the District of Columbia), the insurance company of the driver who caused the accident is responsible for paying for the damages, a system also known as a “tort” system.⁷

This is distinct from the 12 “no-fault” states, where a driver’s own Personal Injury Protection (PIP) coverage handles their initial medical expenses, regardless of who was to blame.⁹

The at-fault system, which the protagonist was now navigating, hinges entirely on determining who is legally responsible.

The first crack in the foundation of the protagonist’s confidence appeared with the realization of a critical, overlooked choice.

By filing a third-party claim, they had entered an inherently adversarial relationship.

The other driver’s insurer had no contractual obligation to them; its primary legal and fiduciary duty was to protect its own policyholder and its own financial interests.⁶

This dynamic explains the delays, disputes, and frustrations that are hallmarks of the third-party claim experience.¹²

The alternative, which most people are unaware of, would have been to file a “first-party” claim with their own insurance company.

While this would likely require paying a deductible upfront, it would leverage their contractual relationship, often resulting in faster service for repairs.⁶

Their insurer would then pursue the at-fault party’s company for reimbursement through a process called “subrogation,” eventually recovering the costs and refunding the deductible.¹⁴

The choice of where to file the initial claim is the first strategic decision a person makes after an accident, a trade-off between the convenience of dealing with one’s own insurer and the direct—but more contentious—path of a third-party claim.

The protagonist had unknowingly chosen the more difficult road.

The Adjuster’s Game and the Concept of Shared Blame

When the adjuster from the other company called, the tone had shifted.

The professional courtesy was a thin veneer over a series of pointed, probing questions.

“How fast were you traveling as you approached the intersection? Did you observe the other vehicle before the moment of impact? Was there an opportunity to take evasive action?” The questions were designed not to gather facts, but to create a narrative.

The driver’s confidence began to waver, replaced by a sense of being interrogated.

The adjuster then introduced a concept that would become the central battleground of the claim: “comparative negligence.” They suggested that while their driver may have failed to stop, the protagonist might also bear some responsibility.⁶

Perhaps they were a few miles per hour over the speed limit.

Perhaps they weren’t paying full attention.

The adjuster was planting the seed of shared blame, a common tactic used to reduce the insurance company’s financial liability.¹⁶

The emotional impact was immediate and profound.

The clear-cut facts of the accident were being twisted into a murky debate.

The driver felt accused, defensive, and increasingly powerless.

This experience mirrors the deep anxiety and frustration voiced in countless personal accounts, where victims find themselves suddenly on trial, their own actions scrutinized in an effort to shift blame and minimize payouts.¹⁸

The Lowball Offer and the Repair Runaround

The adjuster’s strategy soon manifested in a tangible financial offer.

The initial estimate for the vehicle repairs was shockingly low, far less than the quote the driver had received from their trusted local body shop.

The reason, the adjuster explained, was that the insurance company would only pay for aftermarket or used parts, not the Original Equipment Manufacturer (OEM) parts the car was built with.¹⁴

For any non-safety parts, unless the vehicle was nearly new, this was standard practice.²¹

The protagonist was then informed that while they had the right to choose any repair shop, the insurer was only obligated to pay a “reasonable” cost based on prevailing local rates.³

If their preferred shop charged more, the difference would be their responsibility.

This created an immediate dilemma: accept a potentially lower-quality repair from an insurer-approved shop or pay hundreds, perhaps thousands, out of pocket to be made whole.

At the same time, the physical reality of the accident began to set in.

The whiplash that started as a dull ache had become a sharp, persistent pain requiring doctor visits and physical therapy.

Medical bills started arriving in the mail.

The anxiety intensified as it became clear that the settlement process was not a matter of weeks, but months.

Even straightforward claims can take three to six months to resolve, while more complex cases can drag on for over a year.²²

The psychological toll—sleepless nights, a newfound fear of driving, and the constant stress of the unresolved claim—began to overshadow the physical injuries.²⁵

The driver was trapped in a bureaucratic labyrinth with no clear exit.

Part II: The Night of a Thousand Tabs

Frustrated, stonewalled, and feeling utterly lost, the protagonist resolved to understand the system that had ensnared them.

A long night spent online, illuminated by the glow of a laptop screen and fueled by a sense of injustice, became a journey of epiphany.

What began as a desperate search for answers transformed into a deep dive into the legal architecture that governs every at-fault insurance claim in the country.

Cracking the Code of Negligence

The key to the entire puzzle was the adjuster’s phrase: “comparative negligence.” The protagonist’s research revealed that this wasn’t just an adjuster’s opinion; it was a specific legal doctrine, and its application varied dramatically from state to state.

It became clear that the outcome of an accident is determined not just by the facts of the crash, but by a geographic lottery of state law.²⁸

The driver began to map out the three distinct systems of blame used in the United States to handle cases of shared fault ²⁹:

1. Contributory Negligence: This was revealed to be the harshest and most unforgiving system. In the few states that still use it—including Alabama, Maryland, North Carolina, and Virginia—an injured party is completely barred from recovering any damages if they are found to be even 1% at fault. A driver who was 99% blameless could be forced to bear 100% of their own costs due to a minuscule contribution to the accident.¹¹
2. Pure Comparative Negligence: This system represents the opposite end of the spectrum. Used in about a dozen states like California, Florida, and New York, it allows an injured party to recover damages regardless of their degree of fault. The compensation is simply reduced by their percentage of blame. A driver found to be 80% responsible for a crash could still sue the other party to recover 20% of their damages.¹¹
3. Modified Comparative Negligence: The protagonist discovered that their state, like the majority of others, used this hybrid approach. This was the “aha!” moment. Under this system, an injured person can recover damages only if their fault does not exceed a specific threshold. Exceeding that threshold means recovering nothing. There are two main variations:

• The 50% Bar Rule: Used in states like Arkansas, Colorado, and Georgia, a person cannot recover damages if they are found to be 50% or more at fault for the accident.³⁰
• The 51% Bar Rule: Used in states like Texas, Illinois, and Wisconsin, a person is barred from recovery only if their fault is 51% or greater. This means a person who is 50% at fault can still recover 50% of their damages.³⁰

This research provided a stunning moment of clarity.

The adjuster’s probing questions were not a personal attack; they were a calculated strategy.

The entire negotiation was a game dictated by the state’s specific negligence law.

In a 51% bar state, the adjuster’s primary goal is to find any plausible reason—speeding, inattention, failure to take evasive action—to push the claimant’s share of fault over the 50% line.

The financial incentive is immense: shifting the fault determination from 50/50 to 51/49 changes the insurer’s liability from paying half the damages to paying zero.

Even assigning 20% of the fault saves the company 20% of the total payout.⁶

The state’s negligence law was the adjuster’s playbook, and the protagonist had been playing the game without knowing the rules.

The Data That Changes Everything

The late-night research expanded, uncovering data that placed the protagonist’s personal struggle within a national context.

Reports from the National Association of Insurance Commissioners (NAIC) and advice from consumer advocacy groups provided hard numbers that demystified the insurance industry’s behavior.

• The High Cost of Accidents: The 2021/2022 NAIC Auto Insurance Database Report revealed the scale of the money involved. The average claim payout for a bodily injury liability claim in 2021 was nearly $25,000, while the average for property damage liability exceeded $5,700.³³ With such sums at stake on every claim, the economic motive to dispute fault and minimize payouts became starkly clear.
• The Reality of Lowball Offers: Guidance from the Consumer Federation of America confirmed the protagonist’s experience was not unique. Insurers operate on a model that financially incentivizes them to pay out as little as possible on every claim to achieve an “underwriting profit”.³⁴ This institutional pressure, not personal malice, drives the frustrating tactics claimants often face.
• Delays as a Strategy: The seemingly endless timeline was also put into perspective. While simple cases may settle in 3 to 6 months, complex ones can take over a year, and legal experts note that insurance carriers may deliberately prolong investigations to frustrate claimants into accepting lower settlement offers or abandoning their claims altogether.²³
• The Peril of Inadequate Coverage: The research led to a sobering reflection on the protagonist’s own insurance policy. They read harrowing stories of drivers whose at-fault accidents resulted in damages far exceeding their policy limits. With state minimum liability requirements often shockingly low (e.g., $15,000 or $25,000 for bodily injury), a serious accident can leave the at-fault driver personally responsible for hundreds of thousands of dollars in medical bills and lost wages, potentially leading to garnished wages, property liens, and financial ruin.⁵

This night of research culminated in the creation of a single, powerful document—a table that laid bare the high-stakes legal landscape of American roads.

The High-Stakes Map of American Driving: A State-by-State Guide to Negligence Laws

State	System Type	Negligence Law	What It Means for You (Plain English Explanation)
Alabama	At-Fault	Contributory	If you are found even 1% at fault, you recover $0.
Alaska	At-Fault	Pure Comparative	Your recovery is reduced by your percentage of fault.
Arizona	At-Fault	Pure Comparative	Your recovery is reduced by your percentage of fault.
Arkansas	At-Fault	Modified Comparative (50% Bar)	You cannot recover damages if you are 50% or more at fault.
California	At-Fault	Pure Comparative	Your recovery is reduced by your percentage of fault.
Colorado	At-Fault	Modified Comparative (50% Bar)	You cannot recover damages if you are 50% or more at fault.
Connecticut	At-Fault	Modified Comparative (51% Bar)	You cannot recover damages if you are 51% or more at fault.
Delaware	At-Fault	Modified Comparative (51% Bar)	You cannot recover damages if you are 51% or more at fault.
District of Columbia	At-Fault	Contributory	If you are found even 1% at fault, you recover $0.
Florida	No-Fault	Pure Comparative	Your recovery is reduced by your percentage of fault.
Georgia	At-Fault	Modified Comparative (50% Bar)	You cannot recover damages if you are 50% or more at fault.
Hawaii	No-Fault	Modified Comparative (51% Bar)	You cannot recover damages if you are 51% or more at fault.
Idaho	At-Fault	Modified Comparative (50% Bar)	You cannot recover damages if you are 50% or more at fault.
Illinois	At-Fault	Modified Comparative (51% Bar)	You cannot recover damages if you are 51% or more at fault.
Indiana	At-Fault	Modified Comparative (51% Bar)	You cannot recover damages if you are 51% or more at fault.
Iowa	At-Fault	Modified Comparative (51% Bar)	You cannot recover damages if you are 51% or more at fault.
Kansas	No-Fault	Modified Comparative (50% Bar)	You cannot recover damages if you are 50% or more at fault.
Kentucky	Choice No-Fault	Pure Comparative	Your recovery is reduced by your percentage of fault.
Louisiana	At-Fault	Pure Comparative	Your recovery is reduced by your percentage of fault.
Maine	At-Fault	Modified Comparative (50% Bar)	You cannot recover damages if you are 50% or more at fault.
Maryland	At-Fault	Contributory	If you are found even 1% at fault, you recover $0.
Massachusetts	No-Fault	Modified Comparative (51% Bar)	You cannot recover damages if you are 51% or more at fault.
Michigan	No-Fault	Modified Comparative (51% Bar)	You cannot recover damages if you are 51% or more at fault.
Minnesota	No-Fault	Modified Comparative (51% Bar)	You cannot recover damages if you are 51% or more at fault.
Mississippi	At-Fault	Pure Comparative	Your recovery is reduced by your percentage of fault.
Missouri	At-Fault	Pure Comparative	Your recovery is reduced by your percentage of fault.
Montana	At-Fault	Modified Comparative (51% Bar)	You cannot recover damages if you are 51% or more at fault.
Nebraska	At-Fault	Modified Comparative (50% Bar)	You cannot recover damages if you are 50% or more at fault.
Nevada	At-Fault	Modified Comparative (51% Bar)	You cannot recover damages if you are 51% or more at fault.
New Hampshire	At-Fault	Modified Comparative (51% Bar)	You cannot recover damages if you are 51% or more at fault.
New Jersey	Choice No-Fault	Modified Comparative (51% Bar)	You cannot recover damages if you are 51% or more at fault.
New Mexico	At-Fault	Pure Comparative	Your recovery is reduced by your percentage of fault.
New York	No-Fault	Pure Comparative	Your recovery is reduced by your percentage of fault.
North Carolina	At-Fault	Contributory	If you are found even 1% at fault, you recover $0.
North Dakota	No-Fault	Modified Comparative (50% Bar)	You cannot recover damages if you are 50% or more at fault.
Ohio	At-Fault	Modified Comparative (51% Bar)	You cannot recover damages if you are 51% or more at fault.
Oklahoma	At-Fault	Modified Comparative (51% Bar)	You cannot recover damages if you are 51% or more at fault.
Oregon	At-Fault	Modified Comparative (51% Bar)	You cannot recover damages if you are 51% or more at fault.
Pennsylvania	Choice No-Fault	Modified Comparative (51% Bar)	You cannot recover damages if you are 51% or more at fault.
Rhode Island	At-Fault	Pure Comparative	Your recovery is reduced by your percentage of fault.
South Carolina	At-Fault	Modified Comparative (51% Bar)	You cannot recover damages if you are 51% or more at fault.
South Dakota	At-Fault	Slight/Gross Negligence	You can only recover if your negligence was “slight” and the other party’s was “gross.”
Tennessee	At-Fault	Modified Comparative (50% Bar)	You cannot recover damages if you are 50% or more at fault.
Texas	At-Fault	Modified Comparative (51% Bar)	You cannot recover damages if you are 51% or more at fault.
Utah	No-Fault	Modified Comparative (50% Bar)	You cannot recover damages if you are 50% or more at fault.
Vermont	At-Fault	Modified Comparative (51% Bar)	You cannot recover damages if you are 51% or more at fault.
Virginia	At-Fault	Contributory	If you are found even 1% at fault, you recover $0.
Washington	At-Fault	Pure Comparative	Your recovery is reduced by your percentage of fault.
West Virginia	At-Fault	Modified Comparative (51% Bar)	You cannot recover damages if you are 51% or more at fault.
Wisconsin	At-Fault	Modified Comparative (51% Bar)	You cannot recover damages if you are 51% or more at fault.

Data compiled from sources.⁷

Part III: Taking the Wheel

Armed with this newfound knowledge, the protagonist was no longer a passive victim of the process but an active participant.

The feeling of powerlessness was replaced by a clear strategy.

This final phase of the journey serves as a practical guide for anyone facing a similar ordeal, demonstrating how to engage with the claims process from a position of strength.

The Counter-Offensive: Organizing the Narrative

The first step was to move from defense to offense by building an undeniable, evidence-based case.

The protagonist meticulously organized all documentation into a comprehensive claim package designed to systematically dismantle the adjuster’s narrative of shared fault.

This package included:

• The Official Police Report: The formal document that often serves as the foundational piece of evidence in a claim.³
• A Written Accident Summary: A clear, concise, and factual account of the accident from the driver’s perspective, directly countering the adjuster’s insinuations.
• Annotated Photographic Evidence: All photos from the scene were compiled and labeled to highlight key facts: the other driver’s failure to stop, the points of impact, road conditions, and the final resting positions of the vehicles.¹
• Witness Information: The name and contact information of the independent witness who saw the other driver run the stop sign, a crucial element for corroborating the driver’s account.⁵
• A Communication Log: A detailed record of every phone call and email with the insurance company, including dates, times, the representative’s name, and a summary of the conversation. This creates a paper trail and holds the company accountable.³⁴
• Complete Medical and Financial Records: All medical bills, reports from doctors and physical therapists, and documentation of lost wages due to time off from work.³
• A Pain and Suffering Journal: A running log detailing the physical pain, emotional distress, sleepless nights, and the overall impact the accident had on their daily life. This is critical for substantiating a claim for non-economic damages.²⁵

The New Negotiation

The protagonist re-engaged with the adjuster, but the dynamic had fundamentally shifted.

They were no longer reacting emotionally but presenting a structured, logical case.

They calmly walked the adjuster through their evidence and explicitly stated their understanding of the state’s specific modified comparative negligence law.

This simple act of citing the statute (e.g., “Under Illinois law 735 ILCS 5/2-1116…”) signaled that they were an informed claimant who could not be easily intimidated or misled.³²

Following this conversation, they submitted a formal demand letter.

This document professionally outlined all their damages, separating them into two categories:

1. Economic Damages: The quantifiable costs, including all medical bills to date, projected future medical costs, lost wages, and the full cost of repairing the vehicle with OEM parts.²³
2. Non-Economic Damages: A calculated amount for pain, suffering, emotional distress, and loss of enjoyment of life.²³

This approach transforms the negotiation.

Insurance companies operate on the basis of documentation and liability assessment.¹⁵

By presenting a well-organized case that speaks the insurer’s language—addressing the core elements of negligence (duty, breach, causation, and damages) ³⁰—a claimant forces the adjuster to abandon subjective arguments and engage with the facts.

An evidence-based strategy fundamentally alters the power balance and dramatically increases the likelihood of receiving a fair settlement offer.

The Professional Crossroads: When to Call a Lawyer

Despite these efforts, the insurance company’s final offer was still insufficient.

It covered most of the economic damages but offered a negligible amount for pain and suffering.

The adjuster was making a final calculated risk, betting that the protagonist would not have the energy or resources to take the fight to the next level.

This is the ultimate decision point for many claimants.

Legal and insurance experts identify several clear red flags that indicate it is time to stop negotiating and hire a personal injury attorney ⁴²:

• Serious or Permanent Injuries: When medical costs are substantial, ongoing, or involve long-term impairment, the complexity and value of the claim demand professional legal expertise.
• Disputed Fault: When the insurer continues to contest liability despite clear evidence, a lawyer is needed to compel them to acknowledge the facts.
• Inadequate Settlement Offer: When the insurer’s best offer does not fully cover documented economic losses, let alone provide fair compensation for non-economic damages like pain and suffering.
• Bad Faith Tactics: If the insurer engages in unethical behavior, such as unreasonable delays, refusing to communicate, or misrepresenting the terms of the policy.

The protagonist made the call.

The narrative describes the immense relief of transferring the burden to a professional.

A skilled personal injury lawyer not only understands the legal system but also the internal workings of insurance companies, as many previously worked as insurance defense attorneys.⁴¹

They can accurately value a claim, negotiate with authority, and, if necessary, take the case to court.

Conclusion: The Road to Recovery

In the end, the attorney successfully negotiated a settlement that provided full and fair compensation for all of the protagonist’s damages—physical, financial, and emotional.

The process was arduous and took far longer than ever imagined, but the final outcome was just.

The journey through the at-fault insurance maze yielded several powerful lessons.

A car accident claim is not a simple administrative task; it is a complex negotiation governed by arcane state laws and powerful economic incentives.

In this arena, ignorance is a liability.

The other driver’s insurance company is not an impartial arbiter; it is a financial adversary.

The single most important factor determining a claimant’s rights is the specific negligence law of the state where the accident occurred.

The ultimate takeaway is that knowledge is the key to navigating the system.

Drivers must be proactive.

Before an accident ever happens, they should review their own policy to ensure they have adequate liability coverage, far above the state minimums.

They should know which negligence system their state uses and understand what it means for their rights.

In the aftermath of a crash, they must be prepared to be their own best advocate—documenting everything, communicating strategically, and recognizing when the fight requires a professional.

The road to recovery after an accident can be long, but for the informed and prepared, it is a journey that can be successfully navigated.

Works cited

1. What to do after a car accident: a step-by-step guide – Allstate, accessed August 16, 2025, https://www.allstate.com/resources/car-insurance/in-case-of-a-car-accident
2. Steps in the Texas Car Accident Claims Process: What You Should Do After an Accident, accessed August 16, 2025, https://www.fvflawfirm.com/blog/car-accident-instructions/
3. Were you in a wreck? Tips for auto insurance claims – Texas Department of Insurance, accessed August 16, 2025, https://www.tdi.texas.gov/tips/what-to-do-after-a-wreck.html
4. The Car Insurance Claims Process: A Guide to Filing a Car Crash Claim, accessed August 16, 2025, https://www.amfam.com/resources/articles/understanding-insurance/car-insurance-after-an-accident
5. Auto insurance guide – Texas Department of Insurance, accessed August 16, 2025, https://www.tdi.texas.gov/pubs/consumer/cb020.html
6. Filing a Claim with Another Driver’s Insurance Company – Illinois Department of Insurance, accessed August 16, 2025, https://idoi.illinois.gov/consumers/consumerinsurance/auto/filing-an-auto-claim-with-anothers-insurance-company.html
7. Fault vs. No-Fault Insurance Laws by State in the United States, accessed August 16, 2025, https://1800lionlaw.com/fault-vs-no-fault-insurance-laws-by-state/
8. Comparing No-Fault and At-Fault Insurance Systems | The Pendergrass Law Firm, PC, accessed August 16, 2025, https://georgiatrialfirm.com/blog/comparing-no-fault-and-at-fault-insurance-systems/
9. What States Have No-Fault Insurance? – Experian, accessed August 16, 2025, https://www.experian.com/blogs/ask-experian/what-states-have-no-fault-insurance/
10. No-fault insurance states – What are they? – Liberty Mutual, accessed August 16, 2025, https://www.libertymutual.com/insurance-resources/auto/what-are-no-fault-insurance-states
11. Understand Who’s at Fault in a Car Accident – Allstate, accessed August 16, 2025, https://www.allstate.com/resources/car-insurance/determining-fault-after-car-accident
12. I was in a car wreck recently, not at fault. The other party’s insurance …, accessed August 16, 2025, https://www.reddit.com/r/Insurance/comments/1ba38ie/i_was_in_a_car_wreck_recently_not_at_fault_the/
13. Accident not your fault? Here’s how to deal with the other driver’s insurance., accessed August 16, 2025, https://www.tdi.texas.gov/tips/how-to-deal-with-the-other-drivers-insurance.html
14. Filing an auto insurance claim | Office of the Insurance Commissioner, accessed August 16, 2025, https://www.insurance.wa.gov/insurance-resources/auto-insurance/auto-insurance-claims/filing-auto-insurance-claim
15. At-Fault vs. No-Fault Accidents – Progressive, accessed August 16, 2025, https://www.progressive.com/answers/at-fault-vs-no-fault-accidents/
16. The Insurance Company Says I’m Comparatively at Fault? | St. Louis Car Accident Lawyer, accessed August 16, 2025, https://www.finneyinjurylaw.com/video/insurance-says-comparatively-at-fault.cfm
17. Ombudsman’s Office – Auto Comparative Negligence Settlement FAQs – NJ.gov, accessed August 16, 2025, https://www.nj.gov/dobi/ins_ombudsman/ombuds_acnsfaq.html
18. I was found at fault. : r/Insurance – Reddit, accessed August 16, 2025, https://www.reddit.com/r/Insurance/comments/whq29p/i_was_found_at_fault/
19. I got into an accident exactly a year ago. Insurance says I’m at fault now and they are going to pay out the guy $400000 – Reddit, accessed August 16, 2025, https://www.reddit.com/r/Insurance/comments/16uvipu/i_got_into_an_accident_exactly_a_year_ago/
20. Common Auto Claims Questions | Department of Insurance, accessed August 16, 2025, https://doi.idaho.gov/consumers/auto-insurance/auto-claims/common-auto-claims-questions/
21. Frequently Asked Questions about Auto Insurance Claims – Mass.gov, accessed August 16, 2025, https://www.mass.gov/info-details/frequently-asked-questions-about-auto-insurance-claims
22. How Long Does a Car Accident Settlement Take: Time & Factors – Wettermark Keith, accessed August 16, 2025, https://wkfirm.com/crunching-the-numbers-how-long-does-a-settlement-take-for-a-car-accident/
23. How Long Does a Car Accident Settlement Take? – Mighty, accessed August 16, 2025, https://www.mighty.com/blog/how-long-does-a-car-accident-settlement-take
24. How Long Does a Car Accident Settlement Take In Texas? – Keith & Lorfing, accessed August 16, 2025, https://lorfinglaw.com/blog/how-long-does-a-car-accident-settlement-take-texas/
25. Can You Sue for Emotional Distress After a Car Accident? – Bykhovsky Law | Wisconsin Personal Injury & Accident Lawyer, accessed August 16, 2025, https://byklaw.com/can-you-sue-for-emotional-distress-after-a-car-accident/
26. What Are the Psychological Effects of Being in a Car Accident? – Knowles Law Firm, accessed August 16, 2025, https://www.knowleslawfirm.com/what-are-the-psychological-effects-of-being-in-a-car-accident/
27. Psychological Effects of Car Accidents | Swenson & Shelley Law, accessed August 16, 2025, https://www.swensonshelley.com/blog/car-accidents-the-psychological-aftermath/
28. Comparative & Contributory Negligence Laws: 50-State Survey …, accessed August 16, 2025, https://www.justia.com/injury/negligence-theory/comparative-contributory-negligence-laws-50-state-survey/
29. State by State Negligence Laws – USClaims, accessed August 16, 2025, https://usclaims.com/news-and-tips/negligence-laws-by-state/
30. Negligence Laws By State (2025): A Complete Guide, accessed August 16, 2025, https://1800lionlaw.com/negligence-laws-by-state-in-the-united-states/
31. At-Fault vs. No-Fault Accidents – AutoInsurance.com, accessed August 16, 2025, https://www.autoinsurance.com/guide/at-fault-vs-no-fault-accidents/
32. Comparative Negligence – Illinois Department of Insurance, accessed August 16, 2025, https://idoi.illinois.gov/consumers/consumerinsurance/comparative-negligence.html
33. 2021/2022 Auto Insurance Database Report – NAIC, accessed August 16, 2025, https://content.naic.org/sites/default/files/publication-aut-pb-auto-insurance-database.pdf
34. Consumer Federation of America’s, accessed August 16, 2025, https://consumerfed.org/pdfs/Auto-Insurance-Navigating-Auto-Claims-Guide-12-14-11.pdf
35. How Does an Insurance Company Decide Who Was at Fault? – Lulich & Attorneys, accessed August 16, 2025, https://www.lulich.com/how-does-an-insurance-company-decide-who-was-at-fault/
36. How Long Does a Car Accident Settlement Take? Timeline, Factors & What to Expect, accessed August 16, 2025, https://ledgerlaw.com/how-long-does-a-car-accident-settlement-take/
37. Has anybody had an at fault accident so large it maxed out their policy limits? – Reddit, accessed August 16, 2025, https://www.reddit.com/r/Insurance/comments/1ki888p/has_anybody_had_an_at_fault_accident_so_large_it/
38. Share your story about being sued in at fault car accident and how that changed your life : r/Insurance – Reddit, accessed August 16, 2025, https://www.reddit.com/r/Insurance/comments/u4ilkb/share_your_story_about_being_sued_in_at_fault_car/
39. Driven to Distress? Your Guide to Emotional Damages from Car Accidents, accessed August 16, 2025, https://mginjuryfirm.com/guide-to-emotional-damages-from-car-accidents/
40. What to expect when you file a car insurance claim – Allstate, accessed August 16, 2025, https://www.allstate.com/resources/car-insurance/how-to-file-a-car-insurance-claim
41. Albuquerque Car Accident Lawyer for New Mexico – Gauthier & Maier Law Firm, accessed August 16, 2025, https://www.maierattorney.com/auto-accidents
42. Car Accident Lawyer | Find a Top Attorney Near You – LawFirm.com, accessed August 16, 2025, https://www.lawfirm.com/personal-injury/car-accident/